岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1673-1682.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2550

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

真三轴加载条件下岩爆过程的声发射演化特征

苏国韶1, 2,燕思周1,闫召富1,翟少彬1,燕柳斌1   

  1. 1. 广西大学 土木建筑工程学院,广西 南宁 530004;2. 广西大学 工程防灾与结构安全教育部重点实验室,广西 南宁 530004
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-23 出版日期:2019-05-11 发布日期:2019-06-02
  • 通讯作者: 翟少彬,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩石力学与工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: shbzhai89@163.com E-mail:guoshaosu@gxu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:苏国韶,男,1973年生,博士,教授,主要从事土木水利工程防灾与安全方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51869003);广西自然科学基金创新研究团队项目(No. 2016GXNSFGA380008)

Evolution characteristics of acoustic emission in rockburst process under true-triaxial loading conditions

SU Guo-shao1, 2, YAN Si-zhou1, YAN Zhao-fu1, ZHAI Shao-bin1, YAN Liu-bin1   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of Ministry of Education, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China
  • Received:2017-12-23 Online:2019-05-11 Published:2019-06-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51869003) and the Innovative Research Team Program of Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2016GXNSFGA380008).

摘要: 利用真三轴岩爆试验系统,对花岗岩开展真三轴加载条件下岩爆过程的声发射试验,初步揭示了岩爆过程中的声发射时空演化特征:岩爆孕育前期,振铃撞击比较小,主频以低频为主,优势频段(基于小波分析能量占比最大频段)为小于125 kHz的低频段,声发射事件点由分散态趋于聚集态,新增事件由临空面向岩样内部方向转移;岩爆发生前夕,振铃撞击比大幅突增,低频、中频、高频信号大量涌现,主频带由离散形态转变为连续形态,250~500 kHz优势频段信号占比明显增加,声发射事件成核区在距临空面较远处成形,临空面附近区域事件点增多;岩爆发生阶段,声发射呈低频高幅特征,优势频段重新转入62.5~125.0 kHz,岩样临空面附近声发射活跃,岩样内部出现明显的声发射事件成核区,表明临空面附近出现了岩板劈裂现象,距临空面较远处出现了宏观剪切破坏现象。

关键词: 岩石力学, 岩爆, 真三轴, 声发射

Abstract: The acoustic emission tests in rockburst process of granite under true-triaxial loading conditions were conducted by using a true-triaxial rockburst test system. It reveals the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of acoustic emission during rockburst process. At the early stage of rockburst, the count-hits ratio is relatively small, and the dominant frequency is mostly concentrated in low frequency bands. The dominant band, whose energy proportion is the maximum based on wavelet analysis, is characterized as low frequency less than 125 kHz. At this stage, the scattered AE events turn to concentrate, and new AE events migrate gradually from free face to interior of rock specimens. Immediately before rockburst, the count-hits ratio shows a continuous sharp increase, AE signals with high frequency, intermediate frequency and low frequency begin to teem, and the dominant band transfers from discrete state to continuous one. Meanwhile, the proportion of dominant band of 250-500 kHz increases significantly. Simultaneously, away from the free face the nucleation zone of AE events forms, while near the free face the number of AE events increases. During the process of rockburst, the acoustic emission is characterized as low frequency and high amplitude, and it has the dominant band of 62.5-125 kHz. The AE events are active near the free face and the nucleation zone of AE events can be clearly observed in interior of rock specimens, which indicates that the spalling or slabbing occurs near the free face and the macro shear failure occurs away from the free face.

Key words: rock mechanics, rockburst, true-triaxial, acoustic emission

中图分类号: 

  • TV 314
[1] 王创业, 常新科, 刘沂琳, 郭文彬, . 单轴压缩条件下大理岩破裂过程声发射频谱 演化特征实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 51-62.
[2] 张艳博, 吴文瑞, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 黄艳利, 梁精龙, . 单轴压缩下花岗岩声发射、红外特征及 损伤演化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 139-146.
[3] 郑方, 邵生俊, 佘芳涛, 袁浩, . 重塑黄土在不同基质吸力下的真三轴剪切试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 156-162.
[4] 张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[5] 甘一雄, 吴顺川, 任义, 张光, . 基于声发射上升时间/振幅与平均频率值的花岗岩劈裂破坏评价指标研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2324-2332.
[6] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[7] 陈炳瑞, 冯夏庭, 符启卿, 王搏, 朱新豪, 李涛, 陆菜平, 夏欢, . 综合集成高精度智能微震监测技术 及其在深部岩石工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2422-2431.
[8] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[9] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 余永强, 李震, 林志斌, . 真三轴条件下的原状黄土增湿变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1235-1246.
[10] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[11] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[12] 张艳博, 孙林, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 刘祥鑫, . 花岗岩破裂过程声发射关键信号时 频特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 157-165.
[13] 郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[14] 尹光志, 鲁俊, 张东明, 李铭辉, 邓博知, 刘 超, . 真三轴应力条件下钻孔围岩塑性区及增透半径研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 1-10.
[15] 张国凯, 李海波, 王明洋, 李晓锋, . 基于声学测试和摄像技术的单裂隙岩石 裂纹扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 63-72.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!