›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (S2): 273-278.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S2.038

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地连墙槽壁加固深度和宽度计算方法研究

金亚兵   

  1. 深圳市地质局,广东 深圳518023
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-31 出版日期:2017-11-23 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:金亚兵,男,1965年生,博士,教授级高工(二级),主要从事岩土工程设计和研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    广东省深圳市地质局地质工程院士工作站专项经费资助项目(No.2013B090400025)。

A method for determination of reinforcement width and depth of trench face of diaphragm wall

JIN Ya-bing   

  1. Shenzhen Geology Bureau, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518023, China
  • Received:2017-08-31 Online:2017-11-23 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Plan Project of Geological Engineering Academician Workstation of Shenzhen Geology Bureau of Guangdong Province (2013B090400025).

摘要: 地连墙槽壁加固深度和宽度既要满足槽壁土体整体稳定性要求,又要满足加固体抗滑(剪)、抗倾覆和抗弯能力要求。首先分析了槽壁加固条件下影响槽壁稳定性的各影响因素与槽壁稳定性安全系数的关系,总结出加固体深度和宽度是关键影响因素,也是工程施工前需要求算的重要控制参数。其次提出了搅拌桩加固体抗滑(剪)、抗倾覆和抗弯能力验算原则和安全性判定标准,也提出了搅拌桩加固深度(长度)和宽度计算方法和在搅拌桩桩顶插入钢性筋并嵌固于导墙中和搅拌桩平面外拱布置等方法以提高槽壁稳定性的措施。利用工程实例,对文中提出的搅拌桩加固深度(长度)和宽度计算方法进行了演算,也对提出的搅拌桩桩顶插入钢性筋并嵌固于导墙和搅拌桩平面外拱布置提高的槽壁稳定性安全系数也进行了演算。最后提出了课题研究展望。

关键词: 地连墙, 槽壁, 搅拌桩, 加固深度, 加固宽度, 计算方法

Abstract: The reinforcement width and depth of trench face soil body of diaphragm wall should satisfy not only the requirement of stability of trench face but also the requirement of anti-sliding (anti-shearing) , anti-capsizing and anti-bending capability of reinforcement body. The paper first analyzes the relationship between the lots of influencing factors and the stability safety factors of trench face, and it also sums up the key influencing factors and the important controlling parameters which are the reinforcement width and depth. Then it puts forward the checking principle and the safety criteria for the anti-sliding (anti-shearing), anti-capsizing and anti-bending capability, and also presents the calculation methods of width and depth (length) of mixing pile reinforcement body. In addition it puts forward measures which can upgrade the stability of trench face by means of inserting steel material into mixing pile top and embedding steel material in guide wall and arranging mixing piles into outer arch in the plane. The verification of calculation methods of mixing pile reinforcement width and depth is carried out, and the calculus of being upgraded stability safety factors of trench face by means of inserting steel material into mixing pile top and embedding steel material in guide wall and arranging mixing piles into outer arch in the plane is also given. Finally, it provides the research prospect on this topic.

Key words: diaphragm wall, trench face, mixing pile: reinforcement depth, reinforcement width, calculation method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473

[1] 刘杨, 刘维, 史培新, 赵宇, 王秒, . 超深地连墙成槽富水软弱层局部失稳理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 9-18.
[2] 邓涛, 林聪煜, 柳志鹏, 黄明, 陈文菁, . 大位移条件下水平受荷单桩的简明弹塑性计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 95-102.
[3] 章定文, 刘志祥, 沈国根, 鄂俊宇, . 超大直径浅埋盾构隧道土压力实测分析 及其计算方法适用性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 91-98.
[4] 唐国艺, 刘智, 刘争宏, 唐立军, 于永堂, 姜文, . 低能级强夯在安哥拉Quelo砂中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 203-209.
[5] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[6] 李瑞山, 袁晓铭. 成层场地基本周期简化计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3227-3235.
[7] 马文冠, 刘 润, 练继建, 郭绍曾. 粉土中筒型基础贯入阻力的研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1307-1312.
[8] 罗林阁, 崔立川, 石海洋, 过 超, 易绍平, . 地连墙-重力式复合锚碇基础承载性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1049-1058.
[9] 朱 宁,周 洋,刘 维,史培新,吴 奔, . 苏州粉土地层地连墙施工对地层扰动影响研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 529-536.
[10] 金亚兵. 地连墙槽壁加固稳定性计算方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 305-312.
[11] 张永杰,夏旖琪,冯夏庭,王桂尧,. 陡坡段双桩-柱基础简化计算方法及影响因素分析[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1705-1715.
[12] 胡秀青,董全杨,吕程伟,王 军,庄心善,. 水泥土搅拌桩软土地基土体动力特性的共振柱试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 343-348.
[13] 周云涛 . 三峡库区危岩稳定性断裂力学计算方法[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 495-499.
[14] 张 昭,刘奉银,齐吉琳,柴军瑞,. 粗颗粒间液桥毛细力演化规律的动态计算方法[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2263-2270.
[15] 汤永净 ,赵锡宏,. 软土地基超高层建筑补偿桩筏基础案例再分析[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3253-3262.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!