›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (S2): 287-294.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S2.040

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

粉质黏土隧道超前支护作用效果研究

李术才1,陈红宾1,章 冲1,龚英杰2,李会良2,丁万涛1,王 琦1   

  1. 1. 山东大学 岩土与结构工程研究中心,山东 济南 250061;2. 哈尔滨地铁集团有限公司,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-05 出版日期:2017-11-23 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 章冲,男,1970年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地质力学模型试验三维可视化及地下工程支护技术方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:zhangchong1970@163.com E-mail:lishucai@sdu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李术才,男,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事裂隙岩体断裂损伤与地质灾害超前预报及防治方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51474095,No. 51674154,No. 51704125);中国博士后科学基金项目(No. 2016M590150,No. 2016M602144,No. 2017T100116,No. 2017T100491);山东省重点研发计划(No. 2017GGC30101)。

Research on effect of advanced support in silty clay tunnel

LI Shu-cai1, CHEN Hong-bin1, ZHANG Chong1, GONG Ying-jie2, LI Hui-liang2, DING Wan-tao1, WANG Qi1   

  1. 1. Research Center of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China; 2. Harbin Metro Group Co., Ltd., Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China
  • Received:2017-04-05 Online:2017-11-23 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51474095, 51674154, 51704125), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (2016M590150, 2016M602144, 2017T100116, 2017T100491), and Shandong Province Key Research and Development Plan (2017GGC30101).

摘要: 以哈尔滨地铁1号线三期为工程背景,采用现场试验与数值模拟相结合的手段,针对超前支护在粉质黏土隧道中的支护作用效果,分别对地表沉降、拱顶沉降、围岩压力、混凝土喷层应力、格栅钢架应力的变化特征和规律进行研究,结果表明,(1)浆液扩散范围过小且不均匀,当前注浆量对土体的改良作用较差,浆土体力学参数并未提高太多,其各项指标与普通土体无异;(2)粉质黏土地层对隧道开挖引起的变形具有一定的抵抗性,超前支护存在与否,变形都能在短时间内稳定;(3)围岩压力横向分布存在明显差异,格栅钢架应力随围岩压力同步激增,说明在粉质黏土隧道中超前支护不具有改善围岩压力不均匀分布、延缓围岩荷载释放的时空效应;(4)格栅钢架最大应力仅为其屈服强度30%左右,混凝土喷层最大应力仅为其轴心抗压设计强度的13.6%左右,强度储备足够保证隧道结构的安全;(5)塑性区范围约为1.5~3.0 m,小导管在径向上并未穿过塑性区,其支护作用实际上是对周围土体的挤密作用,增加其密实度,远远未达到调动围岩自身承载力的效果。

关键词: 粉质黏土, 超前支护, 小导管注浆, 现场试验, 数值模拟

Abstract: In order to find out the supporting effect of advanced support in silty clay tunnel, the ground settlement, crown settlement, surrounding rock pressure, concrete shotcrete stress and grid steel frame stress are studied by the methods of field test and numerical simulation with the third-phase project of Harbin Metro Line 1 as the engineering background. The conclusions of the study are as follows: (1) Grout diffusion range is too small and uneven, the improving effect of current grouting capacity for soil is poor; the mechanical parameters of the slurry soil have not been raised too much; and its indexes are no different from those of the ordinary soil mass. (2) Silty clay stratum has a certain resistance to the deformation caused by tunnel excavation; the tunnel deformation can reach stability in a short time whether or not the advanced support exists or not. (3) There are obvious differences in lateral stress distribution of surrounding rock; and the grid steel stress increases rapidly in accordance with the increase of the surrounding rock pressure, illustrating that the time and spatial effects of the advanced support which improve uneven surrounding rock load and delay the release of surrounding rock pressure in the silty clay tunnel is not existent. (4) As the range of plastic zone is 1.5-3.0 m roughly and the small pipe do not go beyond the plastic zone on the radial, the supporting effect of them is actually the compaction effect they have on the surrounding soil, which increases its density but cannot reach the effect of arousing the self-supporting capacity of surrounding rocks. (5) The maximum stress of the grid steel frame is only about 30% of its yield strength and the concrete shotcrete layer maximum stress is only about 13.6% of its axial compressive strength, which means it has a sufficient strength reserve to ensure a greater safety.

Key words: silty clay, advanced support, small pipe grouting, field tests, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443

[1] 张晓磊, 冯世进, 李义成, 王雷, . 路基高架过渡段高铁运行引起的地表 振动现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 187-194.
[2] 李任融, 孔纲强, 杨庆, 孙广超. 流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 264-270.
[3] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[4] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[5] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[6] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[7] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[8] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[9] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[10] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[11] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[12] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[13] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[14] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[15] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!