高应力下花岗岩耦合节理在剪切过程中渗透率演化特性

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0076

›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 3641-3650.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0076

高应力下花岗岩耦合节理在剪切过程中渗透率演化特性

张强^{1, 2}，李小春¹，胡少斌³，牛智勇^{1, 2}，汪芳⁴，范坤⁵，邵光强⁵

1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室，湖北武汉 430071；2. 中国科学院大学，北京 100049； 3. 河海大学土木与交通学院，江苏南京 210098；4. 中国石油勘探开发研究院，北京100083；5.中国石油塔里木油田公司，新疆库尔勒 841000

收稿日期:2018-04-09 出版日期:2018-10-11 发布日期:2018-11-04
通讯作者: 李小春，男，1964年生，博士，研究员，博士生导师，主要从事二氧化碳地质封存等方面的研究工作。E-mail: xcli@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:zhangqiang02016@163.com
作者简介:张强，男，1989年生，博士研究生，主要从事节理岩体的应力-渗流耦合特性等方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2016YFB0600805)；中国清洁发展机制基金赠款项目(No. 2014069)。

Permeability evolution of coupling granite joint during shearing under high-stress condition

ZHANG Qiang^{1, 2}, LI Xiao-chun¹, HU Shao-bin³, NIU Zhi-yong^{1, 2}, WANG Fang⁴, FAN Kun⁵, SHAO Guang-qiang⁵

1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. College of Civil and Transportation, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 4. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China; 5. Tarim Oil Field Company, CNPC, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China

Received:2018-04-09 Online:2018-10-11 Published:2018-11-04
Supported by:
This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFB0600805) and the China Clean Development Mechanism Fund Grant Project (2014069).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 节理滑移时其渗透率的演化特性是岩体水力特性重要的科学问题之一。为了深入了解花岗岩节理在高应力条件下剪切滑移时渗透率的变化规律，对花岗岩耦合节理剪切时的渗透率进行了试验研究。为了解决剪切时高压孔隙流体的密封问题及节理渗透率测量问题，设计了一种适用于高压孔隙流体作用下的剪切渗流试验系统。通过剪切渗流试验获得了渗透率随剪切位移的变化规律，以及剪切应力和法向变形与剪切位移的关系。试验结果表明：高应力条件下剪切峰后节理发生明显的剪胀，但其渗透率呈降低趋势；节理剪切过程中节理的剪胀、压缩和凸起的剪断磨损机制共同影响渗透率的变化；高应力一方面限制了节理的剪胀特性，另一方面也增强了凸起的剪断磨损机制，因此，节理剪切时节理渗透性被显著降低。

关键词: 裂隙, 剪切滑移, 高应力, 渗透性, 压力脉冲法

Abstract: Permeability evolution of the joint is a key scientific problem for the hydraulic characteristic of rock mass. To further understand the permeability variation of coupling granite joint during shearing under high normal stress, the permeability of coupling granite joint was measured during shearing. To solve the sealing problem of high-pressure pore fluid during shear and the measurement of joint permeability, we designed a shear flow testing system for high-pressure porous fluid. Shear flow tests were conducted to obtain the variation of permeability with shear displacement, and the relationship between shear stress/normal deformation and shear displacement. Experimental results show that the joint permeability tends to decrease after shear stress peak under high-stress conditions, though dilatancy occurs during shearing. During the shearing process, the damage mechanism of dilation, compression and asperities contribute to the change of permeability. Under high-stress conditions, the dilatancy characteristics of joints are limited, but the shearing mechanism of asperities is enhanced. The joint permeability under joint shear is thus reduced.

Key words: fracture, shear slipping, higher stress, permeability, transient pulse technique

中图分类号:

TU 432

张强，李小春，胡少斌，牛智勇，汪芳，范坤，邵光强,. 高应力下花岗岩耦合节理在剪切过程中渗透率演化特性[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3641-3650.

ZHANG Qiang, LI Xiao-chun, HU Shao-bin, NIU Zhi-yong, WANG Fang, FAN Kun, SHAO Guang-qiang,. Permeability evolution of coupling granite joint during shearing under high-stress condition [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3641-3650.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王珂, 盛金昌, 郜会彩, 田晓丹, 詹美礼, 罗玉龙, . 应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
[2]	张科, 李娜, 陈宇龙, 刘文连, . 裂隙砂岩变形破裂过程中应变场及红外辐射温度场演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[3]	骆赵刚, 汪时机, 杨振北, . 膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
[4]	白雪元, 王学滨, 舒芹, . 静水压力下内摩擦角对圆形洞室围岩局部破裂影响的连续-非连续模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2485-2493.
[5]	高雪峰, 张延军, 黄奕斌, 赵熠, 倪金, 马静晨. 花岗岩粗糙单裂隙对流换热特性的数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1761-1769.
[6]	夏才初, 王岳嵩, 郑金龙, 吕志涛. 裂隙岩体不均匀冻胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1161-1168.
[7]	侯晓萍, 陈胜宏. 采用复合单元法模拟裂隙多孔介质变饱和流动[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1437-1446.
[8]	李华, 李同录, 江睿君, 范江文. 基于滤纸法的非饱和渗透性曲线测试[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 895-904.
[9]	田威, 王震, 张丽, 余宸, . 高温作用后3D打印岩体试样力学性能初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 961-969.
[10]	盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[11]	赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[12]	肖瑶, 邓华锋, 李建林, 支永艳, 熊雨. 长期浸泡作用下灌浆加固裂隙岩体劣化效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 143-151.
[13]	翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[14]	支永艳, 邓华锋, 肖瑶, 段玲玲, 蔡佳, 李建林. 微生物灌浆加固裂隙岩体的渗流特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 237-244.
[15]	吴美苏, 周成, 王林, 谭昌明, . 根系和裂隙对土体水力和力学特性影响数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 519-526.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

高应力下花岗岩耦合节理在剪切过程中渗透率演化特性

Permeability evolution of coupling granite joint during shearing under high-stress condition

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0