挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合
管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0112

岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 2914-2924.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0112

挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究

朱彦鹏^{1, 2}，杜晓启^{1, 2}，杨校辉^{1, 2}，栗慧王君^{1, 2}

1. 兰州理工大学土木工程学院，甘肃兰州 730050； 2. 兰州理工大学西部土木工程防灾减灾教育部工程研究中心，甘肃兰州 730050

收稿日期:2018-01-28 出版日期:2019-08-12 发布日期:2019-08-24
通讯作者: 杜晓启，男，1989年生，硕士，助理工程师，主要从事非饱和土的工程性质及应用研究。E-mail: Dxqlee@163.com E-mail:zhuyp1@163.com
作者简介:朱彦鹏，男，1960年生，硕士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事地基处理及事故分析与处理方面的研究工作
基金资助:
教育部长江学者创新团队支持计划项目（No. IRT-17R51）；甘肃省科技重大专项计划项目（No. 1302FKDA030）。

Research on utility tunnel foundation treated by compaction piles and post-work immersion test in self-weight collapsible loess area with large thickness

ZHU Yan-peng^{1, 2}, DU Xiao-qi^{1, 2}, YANG Xiao-hui^{1, 2}, LI Hui-jun^{1, 2}

1. College of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 2. Western Center of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China

Received:2018-01-28 Online:2019-08-12 Published:2019-08-24
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Yangtze River Scholar Innovation Team Support Program of Ministry of Education of China(IRT-17R51) and the Major Projects of Science and Technology Plan Projects of Gansu Province (1302FKDA030).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 确定了挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合管廊地基的合理处理范围，揭示了挤密桩处理地基效果随地基处理深度的变化规律，研究了挤密桩复合地基在地基浸水后的入渗规律及沉降特征。在大厚度湿陷性黄土场地进行不同深度的灰（素）土挤密桩地基处理试验及埋设TDR水分计和分层沉降仪的工后浸水试验。研究结果表明，随着地基处理深度的增大，各试验区挤密桩复合地基桩间土挤密效果呈增强趋势；挤密桩复合地基桩间土的干密度增长率随地基处理深度的增大而增大；挤密桩复合地基的抗渗性能随地基处理深度的增大而增强；外界水分在挤密桩复合地基中的入渗规律呈现出明显的阶段性，基本由4个阶段组成；挤密桩复合地基桩间土受水浸湿时的沉降变形，随地基处理深度的增大而减小，且呈现出明显的阶段性，基本由5个阶段组成。根据研究结果，在采取有效的防水措施的情况下建议地基处理深度为9～12 m，处理宽度为管廊每边延伸控制在2 m，作为大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合管廊的合理地基处理范围。

关键词: 大厚度自重湿陷性黄土, 综合管廊地基, 挤密桩, 合理处理范围, 工后浸水试验, 入渗规律

Abstract: This study determined the reasonable treatment range of utility tunnel foundation in self-weight collapsible loess with large thickness. Meanwhile, the regularity of the compacting effect on the foundation was revealed with various treatment depths, and the infiltration law and settlement characteristics of composite foundation after immersion were analyzed. With different depths of lime soil (pure soil) compaction piles, the foundation treatment experiments were conducted on the collapsible loess with large thickness. Moreover, post-work immersion tests were carried out by embedding TDR moisture meter and layered settlement instrument. The results show that with increasing the treatment depth of composite foundation, the impermeability of composite foundation, compacting effect and dry density of soil between piles all increase. The external water presents distinct multistage infiltration in composite foundation, including four stages basically. The deformation of wetting soil between piles decreases with the increase of the foundation treatment depth. Besides, it shows obvious five stages. According to the research results, under the condition of effective waterproof measures, the reasonable treatment range is summarized as follows: the treatment depth should be controlled in the range of 9-12 m, and the treatment width should be controlled within 2 m extended from each side of tunnel.

Key words: self-weight collapsible loess with large thickness, utility tunnel foundation, compaction piles, reasonable treatment range, post-work immersion test, infiltration law

中图分类号:

TU 444

朱彦鹏, 杜晓启, 杨校辉, 栗慧王君, . 挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2914-2924.

ZHU Yan-peng, DU Xiao-qi, YANG Xiao-hui, LI Hui-jun, . Research on utility tunnel foundation treated by compaction piles and post-work immersion test in self-weight collapsible loess area with large thickness[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 2914-2924.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	牛亚强，王旭，郑静，蒋代军，刘德仁，蒋鹏程 , . 侧向约束防渗路基新结构防渗效果试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 252-258.
[2]	张世径，黄雪峰，朱彦鹏，杨校辉，姚志华 . 大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地基处理深度和剩余湿陷量问题的合理控制[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 344-350.
[3]	米海珍，杨鹏. 挤密桩处理湿陷性黄土地基的现场试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 1951-1956.
[4]	黄雪峰，张广平，姚志华，张建华. 大厚度自重湿陷性黄土湿陷变形特性水分入渗规律及地基处理方法研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 100-108.
[5]	聂庆科，梁金国，韩立君，李华伟. 夯扩桩加固湿陷性黄土地基机理研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1819-1823.
[6]	宋勇军，胡伟，王德胜，周军林. 基于修正剑桥模型的挤密桩挤土效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 811-814.
[7]	刘志伟，申汝涛. 钻孔挤密桩处理强湿陷性黄土地基试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 339-343.
[8]	曹黎娟，赵均海，魏雪英. 基于统一强度理论的灰土挤密桩应力分析[J]. , 2006, 27(10): 1786-1790.

挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究

Research on utility tunnel foundation treated by compaction piles and post-work immersion test in self-weight collapsible loess area with large thickness

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合 管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究

Research on utility tunnel foundation treated by compaction piles and post-work immersion test in self-weight collapsible loess area with large thickness

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究