岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1797-1804.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0261

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙 主动土压力非线性分布研究

芮 瑞,叶雨秋,陈 成,涂树杰   

  1. 武汉理工大学 土木工程与建筑学院,湖北 武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-12 出版日期:2019-05-11 发布日期:2019-06-02
  • 通讯作者: 陈成,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事铁路路基沉降及颗粒材料数值模拟的研究。E-mail: chengchen87@whut.edu.cn E-mail:r.rui@whut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:芮瑞,男,1981年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程加固设计与理论、软土地基处理方面的研究与教学工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51208403, No. 51708438);武汉市城建委科技计划项目(No. 201639, No. 201802);武汉理工大学自主创新研究基金本科生项目(No. 2017-TJ-B1-12)。

Nonlinear distribution of active earth pressure on retaining wall considering wall-soil friction

RUI Rui, YE Yu-qiu, CHEN Cheng, TU Shu-jie   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
  • Received:2018-02-12 Online:2019-05-11 Published:2019-06-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51208403, 51708438); the Science and Technology Planning Project of Wuhan Urban Construction Commission(201639, 201802) and the Self-determined and Innovative Research Funds of Wuhan University of Technology (2017-TJ-B1-12).

摘要: 挡土墙背土压力的大小与分布是挡土墙设计的普遍关心的问题。由于边界条件、墙背摩擦等的影响,墙背土压力呈现非线性分布特征。而现有几种考虑土拱效应的土压力计算方法,其准确性有待验证。利用开发的挡土墙土压力试验装置,配合椭圆钢棒相似土进行了二维可视化模型试验。采用钢棒相似土配合载荷计测试的方法,精确测量土压力变化,解决了土压力盒测试侧向土压力往往存在较大误差的问题。对静止条件和主动平移模式两种情况下的土压力分布进行了模拟与实测,并与应用现有几种理论方法的计算结果进行对比。由于墙背摩擦以及土拱效应的影响,静止和主动土压力均呈非线性分布,静止土压力实测值小于理论值,实测主动土压力值与Paik法数据吻合较好。由于受墙壁摩擦影响,墙后滑移面倾角小于理论破裂面倾角,且墙壁摩擦引起的应力偏转导致弧形滑移面的发展。

关键词: 土压力, 挡土墙, 模型试验, 土拱效应, 相似土

Abstract: The magnitude and distribution of earth pressure against retaining wall is a common concern in the design of retaining wall. The distribution of earth pressure on a retaining wall normally presents nonlinear feature under the influence of boundary conditions, friction of wall back, etc. However, the accuracy of several current earth pressure calculation methods considering soil arching effect needs to be verified. In this paper, a series of 2D visual model tests were carried out on a self-developed apparatus measuring the earth pressure of the retaining wall, using test setup and analogical soil that was mixed with elliptical steel rods. The application of analogical soil in collaboration with loadometers to accurately measure the variation of earth pressure can reduce errors in the measurement of lateral pressure using the pressure cell. Two conditions include static condition and active translation model were considered in simulating and measuring the distribution of earth pressure. The results were compared with that of several theoretical methods. Due to impacts of the friction on retaining wall and soil arching effect, both the static and active earth pressure present nonlinear distribution. Meanwhile, the measured static earth pressure is less than theoretical value, while the measured active earth pressure is in good agreement with that of Paik’s method. Due to the influence of wall friction, the inclination angle of sliding surfaces is less than that of the theoretical value at the rupture surface. Moreover, inclination of stresses caused by the friction between wall induces the development of arch-shaped slip surfaces.

Key words: earth pressure, retaining wall, model test, soil arching effect, analogical soil

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1
[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[3] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[4] 刘克奇, 丁万涛, 陈瑞, 侯铭垒, . 盾构掌子面三维破坏模型构建与极限支护力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[5] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[6] 陈建功, 杨扬, 陈彦含, 陈小兵. 考虑抗拉强度的黏性填土挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1829-1835.
[7] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[8] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[9] 喻昭晟, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 董亮, ABDOULKADER M S. 粗颗粒土的静止土压力系数非线性分析与计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1923-1932.
[10] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[11] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[12] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[13] 史永跃, 王奎华, 董天文, 马显春, 黄永威. 真空负压静力试桩方法关键技术试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1699-1708.
[14] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[15] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!