岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2099-2107.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0391

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析

龚文惠,赵旭东,邱金伟,李逸,杨晗   

  1. 华中科技大学 土木工程与力学学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-19 出版日期:2019-06-11 发布日期:2019-06-20
  • 作者简介:龚文惠,女,1966年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52178217)

Nonlinear analysis of one-dimensional consolidation of saturated clay including dead-weight effects and large strain

GONG Wen-hui, ZHAO Xu-dong, QIU Jin-wei, LI Yi, YANG Han   

  1. School of Civil Engineering & Mechanics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2018-03-19 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51278217).

摘要: 饱和软土的自重固结涉及许多复杂的非线性问题,而现有分析方法一般基于线性假设,将固结控制方程简化,在沉降变形较大的情况下并不合理。基于Gibson大变形固结方程,推导在单面排水和双面排水条件下的边界条件,综合考虑饱和软土的自重特性与非线性压缩、渗透关系,采用稳定性较好的Crank-Nicolson型差分格式离散并求解非线性控制方程,并从孔隙比、沉降、孔隙水流速3个方面将数值解与CS2固结数值模型进行对比验证。结合工程实例,研究土层不同初始厚度和初始孔隙比对自重固结的影响。结果表明:初始厚度与初始孔隙比较大土层最终沉降也较大。与传统方法相比,该方法所得出的数值解精度较高,实现了高度非线性固结方程的快速求解,其成果更能广泛运用于实际工程的分析之中。

关键词: 饱和软土, 自重固结, 大应变, 非线性, 有限差分法

Abstract: The process of dead-weight consolidation of the soil layer involves many complex nonlinear problems. However, the existing analysis methods are generally based on the linear assumption to simplify the consolidation governing equation, which is unreasonable for the large strain consolidation. In this article, the boundary conditions of Gibson's large strain governing equation are deduced first. Then, the changing compressibility and permeability relationship of soil mass is taken into consideration. The finite difference method (FDM) in Crank-Nicolson scheme is used to disperse and solve the nonlinear governing equations. Verification of FDM solutions shows an excellent agreement with the CS2 simulations, in the aspects of void ratio, settlement and relative discharge velocity. Moreover, the effects of initial layer height and initial void ratio on the consolidation behavior are investigated. The results reveal that both a larger initial layer height and a larger initial void ratio result in a larger final settlement of the foundation. Compared with the traditional method, the method presented in this article realizes the fast solution of the highly nonlinear equation of large strain consolidation, and it can be widely used in the analysis of practical engineering.

Key words: saturated clay, dead-weight consolidation, large strain, nonlinear analysis, finite difference method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 447
[1] 朱剑锋, 徐日庆, 罗战友, 潘斌杰, 饶春义, . 考虑固化剂掺量影响的镁质水泥固化土 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[2] 喻昭晟, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 董亮, ABDOULKADER M S. 粗颗粒土的静止土压力系数非线性分析与计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1923-1932.
[3] 李佳龙, 李钢, 于龙. 隔离非线性平面应变单元模型及其 在Drucker-Prager模型中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1492-1501.
[4] 江留慧, 李传勋, 杨怡青, 张锐. 变荷载下双层地基一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1583-1590.
[5] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[6] 贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[7] 柯锦福, 王水林, 郑宏, 杨永涛, . 基于修正对称和反对称分解的 三维数值流形元法应用推广[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 695-706.
[8] 刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土 一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[9] 于丽, 吕城, 段儒禹, 王明年, . 考虑孔隙水压力及非线性Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则下浅埋土质隧道三维塌落机制的上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 194-204.
[10] 何鹏飞, 马巍, 穆彦虎, 黄永庭, 董建华, . 黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[11] 陈栋, 王恩元, 李楠, . 不同煤岩介质模型的波场特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 449-458.
[12] 李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[13] 邱金伟, 蒲诃夫, 陈训龙, 吕伟东, 李磊. 污染泥堆场处置中自重固结 与污染物迁移的耦合分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3090-3098.
[14] 韩俊艳, 钟紫蓝, 李立云, 赵密, 万宁潭, 杜修力. 纵向非一致激励下自由场土体的非线性 地震反应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2581-2592.
[15] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 多孔隙岩石加卸载力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2673-2685.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!