岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2389-2396.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0407

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

饱和松散堆积体快速滑动的剪胀效应 机制与过程模拟

何子露1,刘 威2,何思明2, 3,闫帅星2, 4   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 力学与工程学院,四川 成都 610031;2. 中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所 山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,四川 成都 610041;3. 中国科学院青藏高原研究所 青藏高原卓越中心,北京 100081;4. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-26 出版日期:2019-06-11 发布日期:2019-06-22
  • 通讯作者: 何思明,男,1968年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事山地灾害减灾理论与技术等研究。E-mail: hsm@imde.ac.cn E-mail:457741265@qq.com
  • 作者简介:何子露,女,1997年生,在读本科生,主要从事工程力学与计算流体力学等方面研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重大项目(No.41790433);NSFC-ICIMOD国际合作基金项目(No.41661144041);四川省重点研发计划(No.2017SZ0041)。

Shear dilatancy mechanism and process simulation of rapid sliding of saturated loose deposits

HE Zi-lu1, LIU Wei2, HE Si-ming2, 3, YAN Shuai-xing2, 4   

  1. 1. School of Mechanics and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031 China; 2. Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; 3. Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2018-04-26 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41790433), the International Collaborative Project of the NSFC-ICIMOD(41661144041) and the Key Research and Development Projects of Sichuan Province (2017SZ0041).

摘要: 工程弃渣、地震滑坡堆积体等松散介质,在降雨条件下所形成的饱和松散堆积体具有更强的流动性,其运动速度、危害范围大大超过预期,其内在机制一直是国际学术界关注的热点问题。采用Iverson基于极限状态土力学原理构建的饱和堆积体剪胀模型,并整合到Savage-Hutter滑坡运动演进物理模型中,采用有限体积法求解滑坡运动学方程,实现了饱和松散堆积体运动演进全程模拟,最后以深圳滑坡为案例研究了滑坡运动成灾过程。结果表明:剪胀效应是导致饱和松散堆积体快速运动的主要原因,饱和松散堆积体的初始状态(孔隙比或固相体积分数)对其运动-堆积演化过程有决定性影响。

关键词: 饱和松散堆积体, 剪胀, 运动, 物理模型, 计算模拟

Abstract: The saturated loose deposits formed by engineering waste and earthquake landslide deposits under rainfall conditions have strong mobility, their movement speeds are fast, and the damage scopes are larger than expected. Their internal mechanisms have always been a hot research issue in international academic circles. In this paper, the saturated deposit shear dilatancy model constructed by Iverson based on the limit state soil mechanics principle is integrated into the physical model of the Savage-Hutter slide motion physical model. The finite volume method is used to solve the landslide kinetic equations and achieve full simulation of the motion evolution of the saturated loose accumulation body. Finally, a back in-situ analysis of the catastrophic construction solid waste landslide that occurred in Shenzhen in December 2015 is presented and evolution process of the landslide is reproduced. The results show that the dilatancy effect is the main reason for rapid movement of the saturated loose accumulation bodies and the initial state (void ratio or volume fraction of solid phase) of the saturated loose deposit has a crucial influence on its motion-accumulation evolution process.

Key words: saturated loose accumulation body, dilatancy, mobility, physics model, computation simulation

中图分类号: 

  • P694
[1] 袁庆盟, 孔亮, 赵亚鹏, . 考虑水合物填充和胶结效应的深海能源土 弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2304-2312.
[2] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[3] 王立安, 赵建昌, 余云燕, . 瑞利波在非均匀饱和地基中的传播特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1983-1990.
[4] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[5] 任宇晓, 闫玥, 付登锋. 浅层地基上管道轴向运动的阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1404-1411.
[6] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[7] 张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[8] 王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[9] 刘斯宏, 沈超敏, 毛航宇, 孙 屹. 堆石料状态相关弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2891-2898.
[10] 李建朋, 高岭, 母焕胜. 高应力卸荷条件下砂岩扩容特征及其剪胀角函数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.
[11] 王凤云, 钱德玲, . 基于统一强度理论深埋圆形隧道围岩的剪胀分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1966-1976.
[12] 周 辉, 程广坦, 朱 勇, 陈 珺, 卢景景, 崔国建, 杨聘卿, . 大理岩规则齿形结构面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[13] 陆 勇, 周国庆, 杨冬英, 宋家庆, . 砂土剪胀软化、剪缩硬化统一本构的显式计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 978-986.
[14] 董建勋, 刘海笑, 李 洲. 适用于砂土循环加载分析的边界面塑性模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 684-692.
[15] 郭万里, 蔡正银, 武颖利, 黄英豪. 粗粒土的颗粒破碎耗能及剪胀方程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4703-4710.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!