岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 2673-2685.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0513

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

多孔隙岩石加卸载力学特性及本构模型研究

马秋峰,秦跃平,周天白,杨小彬   

  1. 中国矿业大学(北京)资源与安全工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-02 出版日期:2019-07-11 发布日期:2019-07-19
  • 作者简介:马秋峰,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩石力学与煤岩动力学方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 50904071,No. 51274207)

Mechanical properties and constitutive model of porous rock under loading and unloading

MA Qiu-feng, QIN Yue-ping, ZHOU Tian-bai, YANG Xiao-bin   

  1. College of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2018-04-02 Online:2019-07-11 Published:2019-07-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (50904071, 51274207).

摘要: 为了研究岩石在加载-卸载过程中的应力-应变关系,以砂岩为例,对其进行常规三轴加卸载试验。分析了峰后卸载阶段岩石的非线性特性,对岩石的损伤变量进行定义,给出了峰后卸载过程中用于描述应力-应变关系的弹性模量模型。通过分析加载-卸载过程中的轴向应变与径向应变的关系,得到了卸载过程中泊松比模型。引入D-P塑性模型,针对砂岩的塑性硬化特性,对硬化函数进行修正,建立了与等效塑性应变相关联的损伤模型。将计算模型矩阵化后进行数值计算。在此过程中得到如下结论:多孔隙岩石在加载过程中表现出明显的非线性特征,随着体应力的增大,岩石的弹性模量逐渐增大。岩石峰后卸载过程中,当轴向应力大于围压时,应力-应变可以利用峰前弹性阶段的弹性模量模型乘以连续性因子进行描述。随着等效塑性应变的增大,泊松比先增大后减小,最终趋于稳定。峰后卸载过程中,等效塑性应变不发生变化,此时泊松比保持不变。利用提出的本构模型进行了数值计算,数值计算结果与试验结果进行对比,结果表明,提出的模型能够反映出岩石在峰后卸载过程中的应力-应变规律。

关键词: 岩石力学, 非线性, 损伤, 应力-应变关系, 泊松比, 弹性模量

Abstract: The conventional triaxial tests were carried out on sandstone to study the stress-strain relationship of rock during the loading-unloading process. The nonlinear characteristics of rock in the post-peak unloading process were analyzed, and the damage variable of rock was defined. Meanwhile, the elastic modulus model was established to describe the stress-strain relationship in the post-peak unloading process. The Poisson's ratio model under unloading was obtained by analyzing the relationship between the axial strain and radial strain in the loading-unloading process. The D-P plasticity model was introduced to modify the hardening function according to the plastic-hardening characteristics of sandstone, and a damage model associated with the equivalent plastic strain was established. At last, the established model was matrixed and numerically calculated. In this study, the following conclusions are obtained. During the loading process, the porous rock exhibits obviously nonlinear characteristics, and the elastic modulus of the rock increases with the increase of the body stress. During the post-peak unloading process, when the axial stress is greater than the confining pressure, the stress-strain can be described by the elastic modulus in the pre-peak elastic phase multiplying by the continuity factor. With the increase of equivalent plastic strain, Poisson's ratio increases first and then decreases until reaching a stable value. During the unloading process, the equivalent plastic strain maintains stable, and Poisson's ratio remains constant. The numerical calculation is conducted by the proposed constitutive model. Compared the numerical results with the experimental results, the proposed model can reflect the stress-strain relationship of rock in the post-peak unloading process.

Key words: rock mechanics, nonlinearity, damage, stress-strain relationship, Poisson’s ratio, elastic modulus

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 张艳博, 吴文瑞, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 黄艳利, 梁精龙, . 单轴压缩下花岗岩声发射、红外特征及 损伤演化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 139-146.
[2] 叶阳, 曾亚武, 杜欣, 孙翰卿, 陈曦, . 球形砾石碰撞损伤破碎三维离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 368-378.
[3] 周跃峰, 杨哲, 饶锡保, 肖国强, 周黎明. 不同含水率下黏土弹性参数的 弯曲−伸展元试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 387-393.
[4] 朱剑锋, 徐日庆, 罗战友, 潘斌杰, 饶春义, . 考虑固化剂掺量影响的镁质水泥固化土 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[5] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[6] 吴再海, 纪洪广, 姜海强, 齐兆军, 寇云鹏, . 尾砂胶结含盐冻结充填体力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1874-1880.
[7] 喻昭晟, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 董亮, ABDOULKADER M S. 粗颗粒土的静止土压力系数非线性分析与计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1923-1932.
[8] 李佳龙, 李钢, 于龙. 隔离非线性平面应变单元模型及其 在Drucker-Prager模型中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1492-1501.
[9] 赵军, 郭广涛, 徐鼎平, 黄翔, 胡偲, 夏跃林, 张頔. 三轴及循环加卸载应力路径下深埋 硬岩变形破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1521-1530.
[10] 江留慧, 李传勋, 杨怡青, 张锐. 变荷载下双层地基一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1583-1590.
[11] 杨艳霜, 周辉, 梅松华, 张占荣, 李金兰. 高地应力硬脆性围岩开挖损伤区时效性扩展案例分析——特征与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1357-1365.
[12] 王青元, 刘杰, 王培涛, 刘飞, . 冲击扰动诱发蠕变岩石加速失稳破坏试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 781-788.
[13] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[14] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[15] 侯会明, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, 吕涛, 张帆. 考虑开挖损伤的高放废物地质处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合数值模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1056-1064.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!