岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2108-2118.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0608

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

铁路台阶式加筋土挡墙潜在破裂面特征模型试验

赵晓彦1,范宇飞1,刘亮2,蒋楚生3   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 地质工程系,四川 成都 610031;2. 中铁西南科学研究院有限公司,四川 成都 611731; 3. 中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-19 出版日期:2019-06-11 发布日期:2019-06-20
  • 作者简介:赵晓彦,男,1977年生,博士,副教授,主要从事边坡稳定性及边坡加固等方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41672295);四川省交通运输厅科技项目(No.2015B1–1)

Model test on potential failure surface characteristics of railway stepped reinforced soil retaining wall

ZHAO Xiao-yan1, FAN Yu-fei1, LIU Liang2, JIANG Chu-sheng3   

  1. 1. Department of Geological Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. China Railway Southwest Research Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 611731, China; 3. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China)
  • Received:2018-06-19 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41672295) and the Science and Technology Project of Department of Transportation of Sichuan Province(2015B1-1).

摘要: 铁路台阶式加筋土挡墙的设计方法尚不成熟,现有设计方法不能满足铁路边坡工程实践的需求。潜在破裂面的确定是加筋土挡墙设计的关键,但现行规范仅对10 m以下单级加筋土挡墙的潜在破裂面有了明确的规定。为了研究台阶式加筋土挡墙在铁路荷载作用下潜在破裂面的特征,设计了1:4的大比例尺二级台阶式加筋土挡墙室内模型试验,以周期性加卸载的方式模拟铁路荷载,通过监测墙面水平位移、墙顶沉降及土工格栅筋带变形,分析确定潜在破裂面的位置和形状。试验结果表明:I级墙(下级墙)潜在破裂面形状与现行规范中的0.3H法破裂面类似,但位置更深,且下部破裂面更缓,表明潜在不稳定范围更大;II级墙(上级墙)潜在破裂面形状与朗肯主动破裂面基本一致,但并未从II级墙坡脚剪出,而是内移刺入I级墙体;研究结果可为铁路台阶式加筋土挡墙的设计提供理论参考。

关键词: 台阶式加筋土挡墙, 模型试验, 潜在破裂面, 铁路荷载

Abstract: The current design methods for the railway stepped reinforced soil retaining walls are still immature, which fails to satisfy the requirement of railway slope reinforcement practice. For the design of reinforced soil retaining walls, accurate determination of the potential failure surface is the key issue. However, though current specifications clearly address the shape and location of the potential failure surface, they limit their use only in single walls with a height of no more than 10 m. This paper attempts to identify the characteristics of potential failure surfaces in stepped reinforced soil retaining walls under railway loads by the use of model test. The model was designed with a large scale of 1:4 and the railway load was stimulated by a specific cyclic surcharge load. The shape and location of the potential failure surface were determined by the comprehensive analysis of the slope surface lateral displacements, vertical settlements at the slope crust and strains of the geogrid at different investigation points. The result illustrated: the potential failure surface in the lower stage wall is similar to that given by the “0.3H” method but has a deeper location and a more gentle inclination of the bottom part, which indicate a larger potential unstable area; while the shape of the potential failure surface in the upper stage wall is generally similar to the Ranking’s active rupture, however it thrusts into the lower stage wall rather than thrusts out from the foot of the upper stage wall. The test results and conclusions drawn in this study can provide theoretical reference for the design of railway stepped reinforced soil retaining wall.

Key words: stepped reinforced soil retaining wall, model test, potential failure surface, rail load

中图分类号: 

  • U215
[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[3] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[4] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[5] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[6] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[7] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[8] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[9] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[10] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[11] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[12] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[13] 侯公羽, 胡涛, 李子祥, 谢冰冰, 肖海林, 周天赐, . 基于分布式光纤技术的采动影响下覆岩 变形演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 970-979.
[14] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[15] 陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性 足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!