›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 4093-4101.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0635

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

车辆荷载作用下钙质砂路基的动态响应试验研究

王新志1,谌 民1, 2, 3,魏厚振1,孟庆山1,余克服3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 广西大学 土木建筑工程学院,广西 南宁 530004;3. 广西大学 海洋学院,广西 南宁 530004
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-22 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 谌民,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要从事钙质砂土力学特性研究。E-mail: asd602579280@163.com E-mail: xzwang@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:王新志,男,1981年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事珊瑚礁工程地质及岩土力学特性的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    自然科学基金(No. 41572297,No. 41372316);中国科学院青年创新促进会(No. 2015272);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(A类)资助(No. XDA13010203)

Experimental study on dynamic response of calcareous sand subgrade under vehicle load

WANG Xin-zhi1, CHEN Min1, 2, 3, WEI Hou-zhen1, MENG Qing-shan1, YU Ke-fu3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 3. College of Ocean, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China
  • Received:2018-03-22 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572297, 41372316), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (2015272) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA13010203).

摘要: 钙质土颗粒因形状不规则而产生咬合嵌固效应,导致土压力传递特性不同于一般黏性土。为研究不同工况下钙质土地基及挡土墙土压力的分布与响应特征,在某珊瑚礁场地对在建的护岸和道路路基在填土和车辆动荷载作用下的土压力进行了动态监测,重点对填土自重、车辆移动荷载及压路机振动碾压荷载下钙质土中土压力的传递与分布特征进行研究。结果表明:填土过程中钙质土中的侧压力系数为0.2~0.3,平均值为0.25;实际观测到的路基竖向土压力远高于按照理论公式计算的土压力;经过碾压的路基在深度为3.28 m处,重型车辆的附加荷载很小。22 t振动压路机在振动碾压时,地基在深度为2.73 m处附加应力增量极小,因此难以提高该深度处土体的密实度;而浅层土体的土压力增量较大,可有效得到压实。

关键词: 土压力, 钙质砂, 动态响应, 车辆荷载

Abstract: Due to irregular shape, calcareous soil particles are prone to produce interlock, which results in different earth pressure transmission from ordinary cohesive soil. To study the distribution and response of calcareous soil pressure in road foundation and on the retaining wall under different loading conditions, the soil pressure under the vehicle dynamic load was monitored at a coral reef site. The study is focused on the transfer and distribution of earth pressure in calcareous soil under the weight of fill and the moving load of the vehicle and the vibration compaction load of the roller. The results show that the lateral pressure coefficient is 0.2-0.3 and the average value is 0.25. The observed earth pressure on the roadbed is much higher than that calculated according to the theoretical formula. At the depth of 3.28 meter in the roadbed after rolling, the additional load of heavy vehicles is small. The increment of the additional soil pressure in the foundation at the depth of 2.73 meter is extremely small. However, when the 22-ton vibratory roller is vibrated and rolled, the additional stress increment of the foundation at a depth of 2.73 meter is extremely small. Hence, it is difficult to increase the compactness of the soil at this depth. Just the shallow soil can be effectively compacted.

Key words: soil pressure, calcareous sand, dynamic response, vehicle load

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 陈建功, 杨扬, 陈彦含, 陈小兵. 考虑抗拉强度的黏性填土挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1829-1835.
[2] 喻昭晟, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 董亮, ABDOULKADER M S. 粗颗粒土的静止土压力系数非线性分析与计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1923-1932.
[3] 史永跃, 王奎华, 董天文, 马显春, 黄永威. 真空负压静力试桩方法关键技术试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1699-1708.
[4] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[5] 闫超萍, 龙志林, 周益春, 旷杜敏, 陈佳敏, . 钙质砂剪切特性的围压效应和粒径效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 581-591.
[6] 芮圣洁, 国振, 王立忠, 周文杰, 李雨杰, . 钙质砂与钢界面循环剪切刚度与阻尼比的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 78-86.
[7] 章定文, 刘志祥, 沈国根, 鄂俊宇, . 超大直径浅埋盾构隧道土压力实测分析 及其计算方法适用性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 91-98.
[8] 张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[9] 柴 维, 龙志林, 旷杜敏, 陈佳敏, 闫超萍. 直剪剪切速率对钙质砂强度及变形特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 359-366.
[10] 胡明鉴, 崔 翔, 王新志, 刘海峰, 杜 韦, . 细颗粒对钙质砂渗透性的影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2925-2930.
[11] 彭宇, 丁选明, 肖杨, 楚剑, 邓玮婷, . 基于染色标定与图像颗粒分割的 钙质砂颗粒破碎特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2663-2672.
[12] 黄大维, 周顺华, 冯青松, 罗锟, 雷晓燕, 许有俊, . 地表均布超载作用下盾构隧道上覆土层 竖向土压力转移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2213-2220.
[13] 谌民, 张涛, 单华刚, 王新志, 孟庆山, 余克服, . 钙质砂压缩波速与物理性质参数关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2275-2283.
[14] 陈建旭, 宋文武, . 平动模式下挡土墙非极限主动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[15] 汪大海, 贺少辉, 刘夏冰, 张嘉文, 姚文博. 地层渐进成拱对浅埋隧道上覆土压力影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2311-2322.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!