岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 2581-2592.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0729

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

纵向非一致激励下自由场土体的非线性 地震反应研究

韩俊艳,钟紫蓝,李立云,赵密,万宁潭,杜修力   

  1. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-27 出版日期:2019-07-11 发布日期:2019-07-19
  • 通讯作者: 李立云,男,1973年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事地下结构抗震方面的研究工作。E-mail: lly@bjut.edu.cn E-mail: junyanhan@bjut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:韩俊艳,女,1983年生,博士,讲师,主要从事地下结构抗震方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金创新研究群体(No. 51421005);国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(973计划)(No. 2015CB057902);国家青年科学基金项目(No. 51808018);北京市科技计划课题(No. Z181100009018001);北京市青年科学基金项目(No. 8184062);北京市教委科技一般项目(No. KM201910005022)。

Nonlinear seismic response of free-field soil under longitudinal non-uniform seismic excitations

HAN Jun-yan, ZHONG Zi-lan, LI Li-yun, ZHAO Mi, WAN Ning-tan, DU Xiu-li   

  1. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2018-04-27 Online:2019-07-11 Published:2019-07-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51421005), the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2015CB057902), the National Youth Science Foundation of China (51808018), Beijing Science and Technology Plan Project (Z181100009018001), Beijing National Youth Science Foundation of China (8184062) and Beijing Municipal Education Commission Science and Technology General Project (KM201910005022).

摘要: 土体地震反应分析对结构的地震反应和抗震安全性评价具有重要的意义,以大型振动台模型试验为手段,研究一致激励和非一致激励下自由场土体的非线性地震反应规律及其影响因素,能够为结构的地震破坏机制分析提供支撑。通过对场地土体的动力特性、加速度响应、剪应力-剪应变曲线以及土体沉降的分析,研究了不同地震动、不同地震强度作用下自由场土体的地震动反应特性及其变化规律。研究结果表明:土体的非线性发展程度不仅与地震动记录有关,还与地震动输入方式、加载等级有关;在大震或纵向非一致激励作用下,土体运动的不一致性导致了更强的土体结构性变化,频率降低,阻尼比增大,土体刚度弱化,土体的非线性发展相对较快;土体剪应力-剪应变曲线和沉降曲线的变化规律一定程度上也反映了土体的塑性发展情况。所得结论和自由场地震反应宏观现象一致,彼此佐证了结论的合理性。

关键词: 非一致激励, 振动台试验, 地震响应, 土体非线性

Abstract: Soil seismic response analysis is of great meaning to the seismic response and seismic safety evaluation of structures. In this study, the non-linear seismic response law of soil in free field under uniform and non-uniform excitation and its influencing factors are studied by means of large-scale shaking table model test, which can provide support for analyzing the seismic failure mechanism of structures. By analyzing the dynamic characteristics of soil, acceleration peak magnification coefficient, shear stress-shear strain curve and soil settlement, the ground motion response characteristics and variation of free-field soil under different earthquake motions and different seismic intensities are studied. The results show that the non-linear development degree of soil is not only related to the record of ground motion, but also to the input mode and loading level of ground motion. In the case of large earthquake or longitudinal non-uniform excitation, inconsistent movement of free-field soil leads to stronger soil structural change, decrease of frequency, increase of damping ratio, weakening of soil stiffness and relatively faster nonlinear development of soil. The variation law of soil shear stress-shear strain curve and settlement curve also reflected the plasticity development of soil. The conclusions obtained are consistent with the observed macroscopic phenomena of the free-field seismic response, which mutually corroborated the rationality of the results.

Key words: non-uniform excitations, shaking table test, seismic response, soil nonlinear

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 徐超, 罗敏敏, 任非凡, 沈盼盼, 杨子凡. 加筋土柔性桥台复合结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[2] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 基于自由场大型振动台试验的饱和砂土 固-液相变特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[3] 杨长卫, 童心豪, 王栋, 谭信荣, 郭雪岩, 曹礼聪, . 地震作用下有砟轨道路基动力响应 规律振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[4] 乔向进, 梁庆国, 曹小平, 王丽丽, . 桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[5] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[6] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[7] 韩俊艳, 李满君, 钟紫蓝, 许敬叔, 李立云, 兰景岩, 杜修力. 基于埋地管道非一致激励振动台 试验的土层地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[8] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[9] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[10] 李平, 张宇东, 薄涛, 辜俊儒, 朱胜. 基于离心机振动台试验的梯形河谷场地 地震动效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[11] 张雪东, 蔡红, 魏迎奇, 张紫涛, 梁建辉, 胡晶. 基于动力离心试验的软基尾矿库地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1287-1294.
[12] 冯立, 丁选明, 王成龙, 陈志雄. 考虑接缝影响的地下综合管廊振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[13] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[14] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[15] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!