坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0863

岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 2938-2946.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0863

坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析

张海娜^{1, 2}，陈从新¹，郑允¹，孙朝燚^{1, 2}，张亚鹏^{1, 2}，刘秀敏¹

1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室，湖北武汉 430071；2. 中国科学院大学，北京 100049

收稿日期:2018-05-15 出版日期:2019-08-12 发布日期:2019-08-24
通讯作者: 郑允，男，1987年生，博士研究生，助理研究员，主要从事边坡工程和数值计算方法方面的研究工作。E-mail：yzheng@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail: hainawisdom@163.com
作者简介:张海娜，女，1992年生，博士研究生，主要从事边坡稳定性方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（No. 11472293）；国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（No. 11602284）。

Analysis of flexural toppling failure of rock slopes subjected to the load applied on the top

ZHANG Hai-na^{1, 2}, CHEN Cong-xin¹, ZHENG Yun¹, SUN Chao-yi^{1, 2}, ZHANG Ya-peng^{1, 2}, LIU Xiu-min¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2018-05-15 Online:2019-08-12 Published:2019-08-24
Supported by:
This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (11472293) and the Young Scholars of National Natural Science Foundation of China (11602284).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 车辆、坡顶堆载等造成的坡顶荷载是影响边坡稳定性的一个重要因素。首先，基于叠合悬臂梁模型和极限平衡理论，建立了坡顶荷载作用下岩质反倾边坡的力学分析模型，推导了坡顶荷载作用下边坡的剩余倾倒力和剩余滑移力计算公式，给出了岩层破坏模式判别条件，并通过大型数学分析软件Matlab将分析方法程序化；然后，通过与离散元模拟结果进行对比分析，验证了所提分析模型的准确性；最后，基于所提分析方法，进行了不同参数的敏感性分析。研究结果表明，坡顶荷载对岩层剩余力的影响较大，但对岩层破坏模式的影响不大；对边坡稳定性较为敏感的切坡角度为50°和岩层倾角为58°，当小于该值时，边坡稳定性将显著提高；层间黏聚力对自重边坡稳定性影响较大；数值模拟与理论分析得到的安全系数较为一致，验证了考虑坡顶荷载作用下弯曲倾倒破坏分析理论解的正确性，可为类似工程稳定性分析提供参考。

关键词: 弯曲倾倒破坏, 坡顶荷载, 极限平衡, 剩余力, 安全系数

Abstract: Top load of slope caused by vehicle and slope surcharge is an important factor affecting slope stability. Firstly, the mechanical analysis model for rock slope under the top load is established based on the superposed cantilever beam model and the limit equilibrium theory. Then the residual overturning force and residual slip force of anti-inclined rock slope are derived, and the criterion for the failure mode of rock stratum is proposed. Meanwhile, the theoretical method is programmed by Matlab, and its theoretical solution is obtained and compared with the results of the discrete element simulation, which verifies that the proposed model is reasonable. Finally, according to the proposed method, the sensitivity analysis on different parameters is carried out. The results show that the effect of top load is large on the residual force of strata, but is small on the failure mode. The sensitive angles of slope and rock strata greatly improve the slope stability when it is larger than the actual angle value. The interlayer cohesion has a significant influence on the stability of slope with self-weight. The safety factors of numerical simulation and theoretical analysis are consistent, which proves the correctness of the theoretical solution of the flexural toppling failure under the top load. The results can provide references for the stability analysis of similar projects.

Key words: flexural toppling failure, slope top load, limit equilibrium method, residual force, safety factor

中图分类号:

TU 443

张海娜, 陈从新, 郑允, 孙朝燚, 张亚鹏, 刘秀敏, . 坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.

ZHANG Hai-na, CHEN Cong-xin, ZHENG Yun, SUN Chao-yi, ZHANG Ya-peng, LIU Xiu-min, . Analysis of flexural toppling failure of rock slopes subjected to the load applied on the top[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	刘杨, 刘维, 史培新, 赵宇, 王秒, . 超深地连墙成槽富水软弱层局部失稳理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 9-18.
[2]	孙曦源, 衡朝阳, 周智, 张剑涛. 某超浅埋过街通道围岩压力的极限平衡求解方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 312-318.
[3]	肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[4]	周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[5]	肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[6]	江南, 黄林, 冯君, 张圣亮, 王铎, . 铁路悬索桥隧道式锚碇设计计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 999-1009.
[7]	陈建功, 李会, 贺自勇, . 基于变分法的均质土坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2931-2937.
[8]	陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[9]	余国, 谢谟文, 孙紫豪, 刘鹏. 基于GIS的三维对称边坡滑面正应力分布逼近函数构造[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2332-2340.
[10]	吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[11]	李书兆, 王忠畅, 贾旭, 贺林林, . 软黏土中张紧式吸力锚循环承载力简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1704-1712.
[12]	余国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[13]	任晋岚, 陈曦, 王冬勇, 吕彦楠. 基于广义Hoek-Brown准则的瞬时线性化强度折减技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4865-4872.
[14]	李典庆, 周强, 曹子君, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的岩土工程设计安全判据[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3977-3986.
[15]	尹小涛，薛海斌，汤华，任兴文，宋罡,. 边坡局部和整体稳定性评价方法的辩证统一[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析

Analysis of flexural toppling failure of rock slopes subjected to the load applied on the top

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0