岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 3697-3708.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1083

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    

基于快速行进迎风线性插值的微震定位算法研究

蒋若辰,徐奴文,戴峰,周家文   

  1. 四川大学 水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610065
  • 修回日期:2018-06-21 出版日期:2019-09-10 发布日期:2019-09-08
  • 通讯作者: 徐奴文,男,1981年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土工程灾害机制与微震监测方面的研究。E-mail:xunuwen@scu.edu.cn E-mail:R_C_Jiang@163.com
  • 作者简介:蒋若辰,男,1993年生,硕士,主要从事微震监测方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2017YFC1501100);国家自然科学基金(No.51679158)。

Research on microseismic location based on fast marching upwind linear interpolation method

JIANG Ruo-chen, XU Nu-wen, DAI Feng, ZHOU Jia-wen   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China
  • Revised:2018-06-21 Online:2019-09-10 Published:2019-09-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China(2017YFC1501100) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51679158).

摘要: 准确的微震定位方法是微震监测技术进行岩体稳定性分析的基础,而初至波走时计算方法是决定微震定位精度重要因素之一。引入一种由快速行进法(fast marching methods, FMM)与线性插值射线追踪法(LTI ray tracing)改进而来的线性插值算法,实现了在复杂岩体中相对准确的微震初至走时计算,并在均一速度模型和Marmousi模型中得到了验证。在此基础上,采用常微分方程数值算法中的单步高精度Runge-Kutta法,得到了震源点和传感器之间的射线路径,并在分层和带空洞的岩体模型中验证了其合理性。选取最小二乘法为目标函数,通过寻找目标函数值最小的方式来获得最优节点实现微震定位。在所建立的加入地下硐室的Marmousi岩体模型中,对于预设震源点的定位结果误差分别为1.41、1.00、2.83、1.41、1.41 m,验证了所提方法在复杂岩体速度模型中能够实现较准确的微震定位,为进一步提高工程岩体的微震定位精度提供了新思路。

关键词: 微震定位, 线性插值, 窄带扩展, Runge-Kutta, 最小二乘法

Abstract: An accurate microseismic (MS) source location method is the foundation of MS monitoring technology for stability analysis of rock mass, and the first-arrival travel time calculation method is one of the important factors determining the precision of MS source location. An improved linear interpolation algorithm based on the fast marching methods (FMM) and LTI ray tracing is introduced to obtain relatively accurate first-arrival travel time in complex rock masses. Moreover, this improved algorithm is verified by the uniform velocity model and the Marmousi model. On the basis of travel time calculation, Runge-Kutta method, a single-step high-precision method in the numerical algorithm of ordinary differential equations, is introduced to calculate the ray propagation path. Besides, its rationality is verified in the uniform, stratified and hollow rock mass model established by us. Finally, using the least-squares method as the objective function, the MS source location is achieved by obtaining the optimal node that makes the objective function taken the minimum value. In the Marmousi model with underground caverns established by us, the location errors for the pre-set source points are 1.41, 1.00, 2.83, 1.41 m and 1.41 m, respectively. It is verified that the method in this paper can achieve relatively accurate location in the complex rock mass and provide a new idea for improving the accuracy of microseismic location in the engineering rock mass.

Key words: MS source location, interpolation, narrow band expansion, Runge-Kutta, least-squares method

中图分类号: 

  • TU435
[1] 郭 超, 高永涛, 吴顺川, 成子桥, 张诗淮, 韩龙强, . 基于三维快速扫描算法与到时差数据库技术的层状介质震源定位方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1229-1238.
[2] 李 闽 ,陶正武 ,刘全稳 ,吴泽民 ,李 涛 ,肖文联 ,亢 鞠,. 用积分法求取岩石孔隙结构特征值[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1352-1356.
[3] 李倩倩,黄 栋 ,乔建平 ,崔中兴,. 岩体抗剪强度参数的线性优化方法[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 156-161.
[4] 贺建清,刘秀军. 基于最小二乘法的边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1724-1729.
[5] 余东明 ,姚海林 ,吴少锋 . 三轴试验抗剪强度参数值回归分析法的区别与修正[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 3037-3042.
[6] 楼晓明,赵春风,陈 广,蔚 林. 用抗剪强度指标计算预制桩软黏土侧摩阻力的参数统计分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 354-359.
[7] 尹光志,岳 顺,钟 焘,,李德泉. 基于ARMA模型的隧道位移时间序列分析[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2727-2732.
[8] 胡秀宏,伍法权. 岩体结构面间距的双参数负指数分布研究[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2353-2358.
[9] 付玉华,王兴明,袁海平. 构造应力场边界载荷反演的有限元逆逼近法[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1850-1855.
[10] 楚锡华,徐远杰. 基于形状改变比能对M-C准则与 D-P系列准则匹配关系的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2985-2990.
[11] 刘 斌,李术才,李树忱,钟世航. 隧道含水构造直流电阻率法超前探测研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3093-3101.
[12] 孙冠华,郑 宏,李春光. 基于等效塑性应变的边坡滑面搜索[J]. , 2008, 29(5): 1159-1163.
[13] 李晓春 ,陈剑平 ,石丙飞 ,范建华,. 交叉裂隙渗流无网格法初探[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 371-374.
[14] 张 勇,孔令伟,白 冰,李雄威. 确定固结系数的固结速率半对数法[J]. , 2007, 28(2): 355-358.
[15] 何 宁,关秉洪,娄 炎,吴 毅,苏 辉. 保国寺旅游公路软土地基最终沉降量估算[J]. , 2006, 27(S2): 86-90.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!