岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 4021-4029.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1376

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

济南典型地层HSS参数选取及适用性研究

李连祥1, 2,刘嘉典1, 2,李克金3,黄亨利1, 2,季相凯1, 2   

  1. 1. 山东大学 基坑与深基础工程技术研究中心,山东 济南 250061;2. 山东大学 土建与水利学院,山东 济南 250061; 3. 中铁十四局集团隧道工程有限公司,山东 济南 250013
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-29 出版日期:2019-10-11 发布日期:2019-10-20
  • 作者简介:李连祥,男,1966年生,博士,教授,主要从事基坑工程理论与技术方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51508310);山东省自然科学基金(No. ZR2018QEE008);济南市科技计划项目(No. 201201145);中铁十四局紧邻平行地铁车站结构群施工效应控制技术研究与应用项目。

Study of parameters selection and applicability of HSS model in typical stratum of Jinan

LI Lian-xiang1, 2, LIU Jia-dian1, 2, LI Ke-jin 3, HUANG Heng-li1, 2, JI Xiang-kai1, 2   

  1. 1. Foundation Pit and Deep Foundation Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China; 3. China Railway 14th Bureau Group of the Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd., Jinan, Shandong 250013, China
  • Received:2018-07-29 Online:2019-10-11 Published:2019-10-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508310), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2018QEE008), the Jinan Science and Technology Project (201201145) and the Research and Application Project of Construction Effect Control of Adjacent and Parallel Metro Station Group Structure of China Railway 14th Bureau.

摘要: 针对济南地区典型地层上的基坑工程,土体采用PLAXIS 3D中的硬化土小应变(HSS)模型,建立了有限元模型,并根据实际监测数据结合位移反分析技术,得到了该典型地层下土体HSS模型参数的一般选取方法。之后简化模型,分别采用土体的HSS模型与Mohr-Coulomb(M-C)模型进行有限元分析,对比基坑开挖至不同深度时,应用两种模型模拟所得挡土墙变形与墙后地表沉降的差异。结果表明:基坑数值分析中,土体采用M-C模型与HSS模型所得结果的差异随基坑挖深增加而增加,且采用HSS模型所得结果更符合深基坑的实际变形。综合考虑采用HSS模型与M-C模型建模时的参数选取难易程度、经济性以及两种模型数值分析的工程适用性,建议基坑开挖超过15 m时,土体采用HSS模型进行数值分析,反之可采用M-C模型。研究结果对指导深基坑支护设计及岩土工程参数的勘察、选取,具有重要参考价值。

关键词: HSS模型, 位移反分析, 适用性, 深基坑

Abstract: Aiming at the foundation pit engineering in the typical stratum of Jinan, the hardening soil small-strain (HSS) model in PLAXIS 3D is adopted to establish the finite element model, and according to the actual monitoring data and the displacement back analysis, a general method of selecting the parameters for the HSS model in this typical stratum is obtained. Then the HSS model and the Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) model are analyzed by the simplified finite element analysis. The simulation results of the deformation of the retaining wall and the ground surface settlement behind the wall under different excavation depths are compared. The results show that the difference between the simulation results of M-C model and HSS model increases with the increase of excavation depth, and the results of HSS model are more in line with the actual deformation. Considering the difficulty and economy of parameters selection and the engineering applicability of the two models, it is suggested that when the excavation exceeds 15 m, the HSS model should be taken, otherwise, the M-C model should be taken. The research results have important reference value to guide the design of deep foundation pit and the investigation and selection of geotechnical engineering parameters.

Key words: HSS model, displacement back analysis, applicability, deep foundation pit

中图分类号: 

  • TU 475
[1] 李利平, 朱宇泽, 周宗青, 石少帅, 陈雨雪, 屠文锋. 隧道突涌水灾害防突厚度计算方法及适用性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 41-50.
[2] 王成汤, 王浩, 覃卫民, 钟国强, 陈舞, . 基于多态模糊贝叶斯网络的地铁车站 深基坑坍塌可能性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1670-1679.
[3] 吴二鲁, 朱俊高, 王龙, 陈鸽, . 粗粒料的单参数级配方程及其适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 831-836.
[4] 李 贤, 汪时机, 何丙辉, 沈泰宇, . 土体适用MICP技术的渗透特性条件研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2956-2964.
[5] 谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土 承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[6] 刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及 邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
[7] 孙明社,马 涛,申志军,吴 旭,王梦恕,. 复合式衬砌结构中衬砌分担围岩压力比例的研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 437-445.
[8] 王少杰,吕爱钟,张晓莉. 横观各向同性岩体中马蹄形隧洞的位移反分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 495-504.
[9] 周 勇,朱亚薇, . 深基坑桩锚支护结构和土体之间协同作用[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3246-3252.
[10] 贾金青,高军程,涂兵雄,张 磊,王海涛,高仁哲,. 深基坑中压力型预应力锚杆柔性支护结构的离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 304-310.
[11] 田茂霖,肖洪天,闫强刚,. Hoek-Brown准则岩体力学参数非线性位移反分析[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 343-350.
[12] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土区基坑预降水引起支护墙侧移的典型参数影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3295-3303.
[13] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土地基渗透性条件对基坑预降水过程中支护墙侧移的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3039-3047.
[14] 庄海洋,张艳书,薛栩超,徐 烨,. 深软场地地铁狭长深基坑变形特征实测与已有统计结果的对比分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 561-570.
[15] 张 戈,毛海和. 软土地区深基坑围护结构综合刚度研究[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1467-1474.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!