岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 4497-4505.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1692

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑土拱效应的悬臂式抗滑桩最大桩间距确定

张玲,陈金海,赵明华   

  1. 湖南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-14 出版日期:2019-11-11 发布日期:2019-12-01
  • 作者简介:张玲,女,1982年生,博士,副教授,主要从事软基处理及桩基础方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51678231,No. 51608540);湖南省交通科技项目(No. 201808)。

Maximum cantilever anti-slide piles spacing determination with consideration of soil arching effect

ZHANG Ling, CHEN Jin-hai, ZHAO Ming-hua   

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082 China
  • Received:2018-09-14 Online:2019-11-11 Published:2019-12-01
  • Supported by:
    This work were supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678231,51608540) and the Traffic Science and Technology Project of Hunan Province (201808).

摘要: 合理桩间距的确定是抗滑桩设计的重要内容之一。认为抗滑桩的抗滑能力主要来自桩身迎荷面的阻滑能力和桩侧的阻滑能力这两个方面。在假定抗滑桩这两方面的阻滑能力均充分发挥的基础上,从桩侧摩阻力与桩后土拱极限剪切作用厚度范围内的摩阻力与拱后滑坡推力之间的静力平衡条件出发,基于Mohr-Coulomb强度准则,简化摩阻力的分布形式,建立悬臂式抗滑桩桩间距的计算公式。在此基础上,进一步研究了滑坡体的黏聚力、滑坡推力及抗滑桩的截面尺寸等因素对桩间距的影响。参数分析结果表明:桩侧阻滑能力在整个抗滑桩的抗滑能力中占有重要比例,且主要受桩侧面宽度控制;滑坡土体的黏聚力、内摩擦角,桩截面宽度等因素对抗滑桩最大桩间距具有较大程度影响。

关键词: 抗滑桩, 土拱, 桩间距, Mohr-Coulomb强度准则

Abstract: Determining reasonable spacing between two adjacent piles is one of the important contents in the anti-slide pile design. In this study, the anti-sliding ability of pile is mainly combined with two parts: the anti-sliding ability from the pile back face and ability from the pile side. Assuming the anti-sliding ability of the pile is putting into full play, a new spacing calculation formula between two adjacent anti-slide piles has been presented based on Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion. The landslide thrust of the present method is balanced by the pile-soil shear friction on pile side surface, and the soil-soil shear friction within the ultimate shearing thickness of soil arching on the pile back face. Both the pile-soil and the soil-soil shear frictions are simply assumed to have linear distributions along its shearing thickness. Based on the proposed method, a parameter study has been conducted to investigate the influence of multiply factors, such as cohesion of landslide soil, slide force and cross section size of plie on the pile spacing. The results show that the anti-sliding ability from the pile side, which mainly controlled by the pile side width, plays an important proportion in the whole anti-sliding ability of the pile. Moreover, the maximum spacing between adjacent anti-slide piles is significantly influenced by the cohesion and internal friction angle of landslide soil and the width of piles.

Key words: anti-slide pile, soil arching, pile spacing, Mohr-Coulomb criterion

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1
[1] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[2] 刘克奇, 丁万涛, 陈瑞, 侯铭垒, . 盾构掌子面三维破坏模型构建与极限支护力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[3] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[4] 毕宗琦, 宫全美, 周顺华, 程茜, . 循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[5] 黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[6] 郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[7] 孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的 地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[8] 谢芸菲, 迟世春, 周雄雄, . 复杂环境中大规模桩筏基础的优化设计方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 486-493.
[9] 陈冲, 王卫, 吕华永, . 基于复合抗滑桩模型加固边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3207-3217.
[10] 陈建旭, 宋文武, . 平动模式下挡土墙非极限主动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[11] 芮 瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈 成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙 主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[12] 陈 峥, 何 平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, . 考虑土拱效应的管棚合理间距计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1993-2000.
[13] 魏少伟, 隋颜阳, 杨建民, . 圆形与矩形截面抗滑桩抗滑性能的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 951-961.
[14] 刘 洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状 与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[15] 雷 达, 蒋关鲁, 孙圣杰, 戚志慧, 李安洪, . 基于振动台试验的抗滑桩加固斜坡桥基研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 127-134.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!