岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 3062-3070.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2086

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同粗糙度和隙宽贯通充填裂隙 渗流特性试验研究

王鹏飞1,谭文辉1,马学文2,李子建2,刘景军2,武洋帆2   

  1. 1. 北京科技大学 金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室,北京 100083;2 北京科技大学 土木与资源工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-13 出版日期:2019-08-12 发布日期:2019-08-25
  • 通讯作者: 谭文辉,女,1969年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩体力学参数及岩土工程稳定性等方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail:wenhui.t@163.com E-mail:b20150011@xs.ustb.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王鹏飞,男,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事裂隙岩体力学及渗透特性等方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2017YFC0804103);国家自然科学基金(No. 11572344)。

Experimental study of seepage characteristics of consecutive and filling fracture with different roughness levels and gap-widths

WANG Peng-fei1, TAN Wen-hui1, MA Xue-wen2, LI Zi-jian2, LIU Jing-jun2, WU Yang-fan2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mine, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2018-11-13 Online:2019-08-12 Published:2019-08-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0804103) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(11572344).

摘要: 利用3D打印技术制作出30个含10级粗糙度(JRC=1~20)、3种厚度(1.5、3.0、5.0 mm)的裂隙插片,通过模具浇筑成贯通充填裂隙类岩石试件,并对所制备的试件开展渗透性试验,研究在不同围压水平下不同粗糙度、不同隙宽贯通充填裂隙的渗流特性。试验结果表明:(1)不同粗糙度和隙宽贯通充填裂隙渗透率均随围压增加而减小,且在围压加载初期,裂隙渗透率的降低速度明显要高于围压加载中后期,最大渗透率降差达到78%。(2)围压加载初期,隙宽较小时,裂隙渗透率有随粗糙度增加而减小的趋势,且离散性较大;随着围压和隙宽的增加,粗糙度对裂隙渗透性的影响迅速减小。(3)对于10级不同粗糙度贯通充填裂隙,围压加载过程中,均有隙宽越大,裂隙渗透率越大的规律;且在围压较小时,粗糙度越大,不同隙宽贯通充填裂隙渗透率的差值越大,但随着围压的升高,这种影响逐渐被消除。(4)围压对贯通充填裂隙渗透率的影响处于主导地位,两者之间的关系可用幂函数进行描述。

关键词: 贯通充填裂隙, 围压加载, 粗糙度, 隙宽, 渗流特性

Abstract: 30 joint-slices with 10 grades of roughness(JRC=1~20)and 3 kinds of thickness (1.5, 3.0, 5.0 mm) are produced by using 3D printing technology, and then poured into rock-like specimens containing consecutive and filling fracture by moulds. Then the seepage tests are carried out on these specimens with different roughness levels and gap-widths under different confining pressures. The test results show that the permeability of consecutive and filling fracture with different roughness levels and gap-widths decreases with the increase of confining pressure. Moreover, the decrease rate of permeability in the initial stage of confining pressure loading is obviously higher than that in the middle and late periods, and the maximum permeability drop is 78%. In the initial stage of confining pressure loading, when the gap-width is small, the roughness has a great influence on the seepage characteristic of consecutive and filling fracture. While, as the gap-width and confining pressure increase, the effect of the roughness on the fracture permeability rapidly decreases. For all consecutive and filling fracture with 10 grades of roughness, the permeability increases with the increase of the gap-width in the initial and late stages of confining pressure loading. When the confining pressure is small, the larger the roughness is, the greater difference the permeability of consecutive and filling fracture at different gap-widths has. However, with the increase of confining pressure, the difference is gradually reduced. The confining pressure have a dominant influence on the permeability of consecutive and filling fracture, and their relationship can be described by a power function.

Key words: consecutive and filling fracture, loading of confining pressure, joint roughness coefficient(JRC), gap-width, seepage characteristic

中图分类号: 

  • TU 451
[1] 王珂, 盛金昌, 郜会彩, 田晓丹, 詹美礼, 罗玉龙, . 应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
[2] 侯钦宽, 雍睿, 杜时贵, 徐敏娜, 曹泽敏. 结构面粗糙度统计测量最小样本数确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1259-1269.
[3] 夏才初, 喻强锋, 钱 鑫, 桂 洋, 庄小清. 常法向刚度条件下岩石节理剪切−渗 流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 57-66.
[4] 李博, 黄嘉伦, 钟振, 邹良超, . 三维交叉裂隙渗流传质特性数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3670-3768.
[5] 张天军, 庞明坤, 蒋兴科, 彭文清, 纪翔, . 负压对抽采钻孔孔周煤体瓦斯渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2517-2524.
[6] 葛云峰, 钟鹏, 唐辉明, 赵斌滨, 王亮清, 夏丁, 仇雅诗, 李鹏飞, 张莉, 闻炼, 曹天赐, . 基于钻孔图像的岩体结构面几何信息智能测量[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4467-4476.
[7] 周 辉, 程广坦, 朱 勇, 张春生, 卢景景, 张传庆, 章颖辉, . 基于3D雕刻技术的岩体结构面剪切各向异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 118-126.
[8] 王鹏飞, 李长洪, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 断层带不同含石率土石混合体渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 53-61.
[9] 杨圣奇,陆家炜,田文岭,唐劲舟,. 不同节理粗糙度类岩石材料三轴压缩力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 21-32.
[10] 丁红岩,贾 楠,张浦阳, . 砂土中筒型基础沉放过程渗流特性和沉贯阻力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3130-3138.
[11] 李正伟,张延军,张 驰,许天福,. 花岗岩单裂隙渗流传热特性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3261-3269.
[12] 熊 峰,孙 昊,姜清辉,叶祖洋,薛道锐,刘乳燕,. 粗糙岩石裂隙低速非线性渗流模型及试验验证[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3294-3302.
[13] 赵婷婷,冯云田,王 敏,王 勇,. 基于改进粗糙表面Greenwood-William 接触模型的离散元方法[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3440-3452.
[14] 陈 琛,冷伍明,杨 奇,金子豪,聂如松,邱 鋆,. 混凝土桩-泥皮-砂土接触面力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2461-2472.
[15] 张文泉,袁久党,王忠昶,朱纪明,. 采动裂隙岩体压剪渗透规律试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2473-2479.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!