岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 3909-3919.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2113

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

微型桩加固土质边坡的动土压力响应 及其频谱特性研究

武志信1, 2,吴红刚2, 3, 4,赖天文1,李玉瑞1, 2, 4,牌立芳1, 2, 4   

  1. 1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730070;2. 中铁西北科学研究院有限公司,甘肃 兰州 730070;3. 中铁西北科学研究院有限公司 滑坡工程实验室,甘肃 兰州 730070;4. 中铁西北科学研究院有限公司 西部环境岩土及场地修复技术工程实验室,甘肃 兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-19 出版日期:2019-10-11 发布日期:2019-10-19
  • 通讯作者: 吴红刚,男,1983年生,博士,高级工程师,硕士生导师,主要从事岩土和边坡工程方面的研究。E-mail: 271462550@qq.com E-mail: 1169697283@qq.com
  • 作者简介:武志信,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,工程师,主要从事岩土与边坡工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2018YFC1504901);甘肃省自然科学基金项目(No. 145RJZA068);青海省交通建设科研项目(No. 2010-03);云南省交通运输厅(No. 云交科教(2017)37号-(1))。

Dynamic soil pressure response and its spectrum characteristics of soil slope reinforced by micro-pile

WU Zhi-xin1, 2, WU Hong-gang2, 3, 4, LAI Tian-wen1, LI Yu-rui1, 2, 4, PAI Li-fang1, 2, 4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 2. Northwest Research Institute Co., Ltd. of China Railway Engineering Corporation, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 3. Landslide Engineering Laboratory, Northwest Research Institute Co., Ltd. of China Railway Engineering Corporation, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 4. Western Environmental Geotechnical and Site Rehabilitation Technology Engineering Laboratory, Northwest Research Institute Co., Ltd. of China Railway Engineering Corporation, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China
  • Received:2018-11-19 Online:2019-10-11 Published:2019-10-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1504901), the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (145RJZA068), the Research Project on Traffic Construction in Qinghai Province (No.2010-03) and the Yunnan Provincial Department of Transportation (Yunjiao Science and Education (2017) 37-1).

摘要: 通过大型振动台试验,对滑面附近位置处的动土压力峰值分布规律进行了分析。由于地震信号具有持时短、非平稳性等特点,为分析其在不同频带的动力响应情况,利用小波包分析频带划分均匀能力和时频局部化性质,对水平向加载的El波进行了分解,从而对其频谱特性进行了研究。试验结果表明:滑面附近位置处动土压力常常最大,且动土压力在沿桩身高度25 cm及45 cm处均出现了突变,在实际工程中应重点关注这两个位置;对微型桩动土压力影响较大的频段主要为第一频带(0.1~6.26 Hz)和第二频带(6.26~12.51 Hz),在工程应用中应避免这两个频带的地震波与微型桩发生共振;沿桩身高度25 cm处,后排微型桩山侧及河侧的动土压力值均要大于前排微型桩山侧及河侧的动土压力值;而在沿桩身高度45 cm处,前排微型桩山侧及河侧的动土压力值均要大于后排微型桩山侧及河侧的动土压力值。

关键词: 土质边坡, 大型振动台试验, 小波包, 压力峰值, 动土压力频谱特性

Abstract: Through the large-scale shaking table test, the distribution of peak pressure near the sliding surface was analyzed. The seismic signal has the characteristics of short duration and non-stationarity. Based on the characteristics, the horizontal-loaded El waves were decomposed to analyze the dynamic response in different frequency bands by using wavelet packet analysis, which has the properties of uniform frequency band division and time-frequency localization. The test results show that the dynamic soil pressure is usually highest at the position near the sliding surface. Moreover, the dynamic soil pressure is abrupt at the heights of 25 cm and 45 cm along the pile body, respectively, which should be paid attention to in practical engineering. The frequency bands those greatly affect the dynamic pressure of micro-piles are the first frequency band (0.1-6.26 Hz) and the second frequency band (6.26- 12.51 Hz). In the engineering application, the resonance between the seismic waves in these two frequency bands and the micro-piles should be avoided. At 25 cm of pile height, the dynamic soil pressure values on the hill and river sides of micro-piles at the rear row are higher than those of micro-piles in the front row, while at 45 cm of pile height, the dynamic soil pressure values on the hill and river sides of micro-piles in the front row are higher than those of micro-piles at the rear row.

Key words: soil slope, large shaking table test, wavelet packet, peak pressure, dynamic pressure spectrum characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 乔向进, 梁庆国, 曹小平, 王丽丽, . 桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[2] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[3] 吴红刚, 武志信, 谢显龙, 牌立芳, . 土质边坡微型桩组合结构大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3844-3854.
[4] 张文生, 罗 强, 蒋良潍, 李 昂, . 小样本岩土参数下考虑矩估计偏差的 土质边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 315-324.
[5] 张小艳,张立翔,李 泽,. 基于塑性极限分析上限法理论的土质边坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1840-1849.
[6] 李 泽,刘 毅,周 宇,王均星,. 基于混合离散的砌石挡土墙边坡极限承载力下限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108.
[7] 连继峰,罗 强,谢 涛. 顺坡渗流下矩形骨架护坡浅层稳定性[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 61-69.
[8] 龚文惠,陈训龙,邱金伟,王 佳,钟旭晗. 基于滑移线场理论的地震作用下土质边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1733-1738.
[9] 吴祚菊,张建经,王志佳,吴兴序,汪明元,. 地震动场地放大效应的时频特性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 685-965.
[10] 钱海涛 ,张力方 ,秦四清 ,王思敬 . 地震动作用下均匀土质边坡的临界转角分析[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 62-66.
[11] 刘开富 ,谢新宇 ,吴长富 ,吴大志 ,张继发. 弹塑性土质边坡的ALE方法有限元分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 680-0685.
[12] 赵晓彦,熊自英. 框架锚固类土质边坡预应力传递规律的研究[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2146-2152.
[13] 董金玉 ,杨国香 ,伍法权 ,祁生文. 地震作用下顺层岩质边坡动力响应和破坏模式大型振动台试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2977-2982.
[14] 中国生,熊正明. 基于小波包能量谱的建(构)筑物爆破地震安全评估[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1522-1528.
[15] 程永春,葛 琪,何 锋. 季冻区土质边坡滑动界面临界深度的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1042-1046.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!