岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 4450-4458.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2205

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

穿越黏滑断层分段接头隧道模型试验研究

闫高明,申玉生,高 波,郑 清,范凯祥,黄海峰   

  1. 西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-05 出版日期:2019-11-11 发布日期:2019-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 申玉生,男,1976年生,博士,副教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程抗减震技术理论方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: sys1997@163.com E-mail:yangaoming@my.swjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:闫高明,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道与地下工程抗震方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目资助(No. 51678501,No. 51778540);“十三五”国家重点研发计划(No. 2016YFB1200401);国家留学基金委 (No. 201707000044)。

Experimental study of stick-slip fault crossing segmental tunnels with joints

YAN Gao-ming, SHEN Yu-sheng, GAO Bo, ZHENG Qing, FAN Kai-xiang, HUANG Hai-feng   

  1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2018-12-05 Online:2019-11-11 Published:2019-12-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678501, 51778540), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB1200401) and the Program of China Scholarships Council (201707000044).

摘要: 数次大地震震害调查表明,隧道穿越断层处是受地震破坏较为严重的区域。为此,基于地震动能量的传播与释放特征,建立了一种穿越断层隧道结构抗减震的设计理念,并提出了一种穿越断层隧道节段接头形式。以跨断层龙溪隧道为依托,采用振动台模型试验研究了单一错动方式与断层错动-震动综合加载方式下带有接头的衬砌结构响应。研究结果证明:强震作用下,地震波对穿越断层隧道的影响是不可忽略的,断层错动-震动综合加载方式是合理的;新型接头能够自身适应性变形协调减轻隧道结构震害,节段间接头的设置改变了隧道的变形形态,提高隧道整体抗震能力;同时减小了衬砌的环向破坏,消弱了节段间地震力的传递,实现了衬砌震害的局部化。由于接头的设置,上盘隧道结构震害集中在距断层1.8倍洞径的范围内,下盘处隧道衬砌震害集中在距断层1.2倍洞径范围内;上盘的衬砌震害主要是由错动-震动联合作用造成的,而下盘衬砌震害主要受地震动的影响。

关键词: 隧道工程, 节段接头, 动力响应, 断层错动, 振动台试验

Abstract: Several investigations after earthquake indicate that areas where tunnels cross through faults are damaged severely. For a tunnel running through fault, an anti-seismic design concept is established and a joint of segmental lining is proposed in this paper, based on characteristics of ground motion energy transmission and release. A shaking table test was carried out to study the response of lining structures with joints under single fault movement loading mode, and combined action of normal fault rupture and subsequent seismic shaking based on the Longxi tunnel engineering. The test results show that effect of earthquake wave on the tunnel can not to be ignored, and the loading mode of combined normal fault rupture and subsequent seismic shaking was reasonable. The new joint designed segmental linings could alleviate the tunnel structure damage by self-adaptive deformation, and adjust the longitudinal deformation mode of the tunnel structure to improve the aseismic capability of the whole tunnel lining. Simultaneously the joints could mitigate the circumferential failure of lining, and weaken the seismic force transfer between segments to realize the local damage for tunnel lining. The damage influence length of the tunnel lining located in the hanging wall is 1.8 times of the tunnel span, while the damage influence length of the tunnel lining at the footwall is 1.2 times of the tunnel span. The tunnel damage of the hanging wall is mainly caused by the combined action of the normal fault movement and seismic shaking, while the damage of the lining is mainly affected by the ground motion at footwall.

Key words: tunnel engineering, segmental joint, dynamic response, fault movement, shaking table test

中图分类号: 

  • U 451.5
[1] 徐超, 罗敏敏, 任非凡, 沈盼盼, 杨子凡. 加筋土柔性桥台复合结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[2] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 基于自由场大型振动台试验的饱和砂土 固-液相变特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[3] 杨长卫, 童心豪, 王栋, 谭信荣, 郭雪岩, 曹礼聪, . 地震作用下有砟轨道路基动力响应 规律振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[4] 乔向进, 梁庆国, 曹小平, 王丽丽, . 桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[5] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[6] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[7] 韩俊艳, 李满君, 钟紫蓝, 许敬叔, 李立云, 兰景岩, 杜修力. 基于埋地管道非一致激励振动台 试验的土层地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[8] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[9] 王立安, 赵建昌, 侯小强, 刘生纬, 王作伟. 非均匀饱和半空间的Lamb问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1790-1798.
[10] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[11] 李平, 张宇东, 薄涛, 辜俊儒, 朱胜. 基于离心机振动台试验的梯形河谷场地 地震动效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[12] 冯立, 丁选明, 王成龙, 陈志雄. 考虑接缝影响的地下综合管廊振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[13] 芦苇, 赵冬, 李东波, 毛筱霏. 土遗址全长黏结式锚固系统动力响应解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[14] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[15] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!