岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 535-542.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0042

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

复杂加载条件下珊瑚砂抗液化强度试验研究

马维嘉1,陈国兴1, 2,吴琪1   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210009;2. 南京工业大学 江苏省土木工程防震技术研究中心,江苏 南京 210009
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-09 修回日期:2019-05-12 出版日期:2020-02-11 发布日期:2020-02-09
  • 通讯作者: 陈国兴,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学与岩土地震工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: gxc6307@163.com E-mail:njtchmwj@163.com
  • 作者简介:马维嘉,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事土动力学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51678299);国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2018YFC1504301)。

Experimental study on liquefaction resistance of coral sand under complex loading conditions

MA Wei-jia1, CHEN Guo-xing1, 2, WU Qi1   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 2. Civil Engineering and Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China
  • Received:2019-01-09 Revised:2019-05-12 Online:2020-02-11 Published:2020-02-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678299) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1504301).

摘要: 循环加载方式与应力路径对砂土的抗液化强度有很大的影响。利用GDS空心圆柱扭剪仪对南海珊瑚砂进行了一系列复杂加载条件下均等固结不排水循环试验,探讨了90°突变应力路径下主应力方向角对珊瑚砂抗液化强度的影响。试验结果发现:以循环应力比(CSR)作为应力水平指标,当不控制中主应力系数b的变化时,主应力方向角 对珊瑚砂的抗液化强度并无显著影响;当控制b始终保持0.5时,珊瑚砂的抗液化强度随着 的增加呈现出先减小后增大的趋势,且在 45°时的抗液化强度最低。基于分析循环荷载引起的土单元大、小循环主应力 、 变化,定义了单元体循环应力比(USR)作为一个新的物理指标,发现不同循环加载方式与应力路径条件下施加于珊瑚砂试样的USR与引起液化所需的循环次数NL存在事实上的唯一性关系。通过引自文献的4种无黏性土原始试验数据的再处理,独立地验证了以USR表征砂类土液化强度的适用性。

关键词: 饱和珊瑚砂, 复杂循环加载条件, 液化强度, 单元体循环应力比

Abstract: Loading pattern and stress path have great influences on liquefaction resistance of saturated sand. Using GDS hollow cylinder torsion shear apparatus, a series of undrained cyclic loading tests was performed under complex loading conditions on isotropic consolidated saturated coral sand in a Nansha Island, South China Sea. The influence of the inclination angle of principal stress ( ) on liquefaction resistance of coral sand was discussed under 90° jump rotation of principal stress path. It is found that: when the cyclic stress ratio (CSR) is used as the stress level index, has no significant effect on the liquefaction resistance of coral sand as the change in intermediate principal stress coefficient (b) is not controlled; when b always maintains at 0.5, the liquefaction resistance of coral sand shows a tendency to decrease first and then increase with the increase of , and the liquefaction resistance is the lowest when 45°. Based on analyzing the change of the major and minor cyclic principal stresses and caused by complex cyclic loading, a unit cyclic stress ratio (USR) as a new index is defined for cyclic resistance of coral sand. A virtually unique correlation between USR and Nf can be established under different cyclic loading patterns and stress paths considered. The recompiled original experimental data of four types of cohesionless soils in the published literature independently verified the general applicability of USR to characterize liquefaction resistance.

Key words: saturated coral sand, complex cyclic loading conditions, liquefaction resistance, unit cyclic stress ratio

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 王丽艳, 巩文雪, 曹晓婷, 姜朋明, 王炳辉. 砾钢渣抗液化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3741-3750.
[2] 王海波,吴 琪,杨 平,. 细粒含量对饱和砂类土液化强度的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2771-2779.
[3] 周 健,陈小亮,杨永香,贾敏才. 饱和层状砂土液化特性的动三轴试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 967-972.
[4] 严 栋,蒋关鲁,刘先峰,李华明. 京沪高速铁路饱和粉土液化特性试验研究[J]. , 2008, 29(12): 3337-3341.
[5] 程国勇 ,王建华 ,张献民 . 饱和砂土的剪切波速与其抗液化强度关系研究[J]. , 2007, 28(4): 689-693.
[6] 张 超,杨春和. 细粒含量对尾矿材料液化特性的影响[J]. , 2006, 27(7): 1133-1137.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 崔皓东,朱岳明. 二滩高拱坝坝基渗流场的反演分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3194 -3199 .
[2] 何思明,吴 永,李新坡. 嵌岩抗拔桩作用机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 333 -337 .
[3] 刘清秉,项 伟,张伟锋,崔德山. 离子土壤固化剂改性膨胀土的试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2286 -2290 .
[4] 况雨春,伍开松,杨迎新,马德坤. 三牙轮钻头破岩过程计算机仿真模型[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 235 -238 .
[5] 杜文琪,王 刚. 土工结构地震滑动位移统计分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 520 -0525 .
[6] 鄢治华,刘志伟,刘厚健. 黄河阶地上某电厂高边坡参数选取及其工程治理[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 465 -468 .
[7] 许振浩 ,李术才 ,李利平 ,侯建刚 ,隋 斌 ,石少帅. 基于层次分析法的岩溶隧道突水突泥风险评估[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1757 -1766 .
[8] 江 权 ,冯夏庭 ,周 辉 ,赵 阳 ,徐鼎平 ,黄 可 ,江亚丽. 层间错动带的强度参数取值探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(11): 3379 -3386 .
[9] 巩思园,窦林名,何 江,贺 虎,陆菜平,牟宗龙. 深部冲击倾向煤岩循环加卸载的纵波波速与应力关系试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 41 -47 .
[10] 李顺群 ,高凌霞 ,柴寿喜. 冻土力学性质影响因素的显著性和交互作用研究[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1173 -1177 .