岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 3889-3896.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0192

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江入海口原状土动剪切模量预测方法探究

杨文保1,吴琪1,陈国兴1, 2   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210009;2. 南京工业大学 江苏省土木工程防震技术研究中心,江苏 南京 210009
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-28 出版日期:2019-10-11 发布日期:2019-10-19
  • 通讯作者: 陈国兴,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学与岩土地震工程研究。E-mail: gxc6307@163.com E-mail:yangwenbao1994@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨文保,男,1994年生,硕士研究生,主要从事原状海洋土动力特性研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2017YFC1500403)。

Dynamic shear modulus prediction method of undisturbed soil in the estuary of the Yangtze River

YANG Wen-bao1, WU Qi1, CHEN Guo-xing1, 2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 2. Civil Engineering and Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China
  • Received:2019-01-28 Online:2019-10-11 Published:2019-10-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1500403).

摘要: 为探究同一类原状土在各应变范围内动剪切模量G随土层深度H的变化规律,对长江入海口处同一钻孔自地表至基岩深度范围内原状粉质黏土与粉土展开系列共振柱试验。试验发现:原状粉质黏土与粉土在各应变范围内G均随H的增加而规律性增加,最大动剪切模量Gmax随H的增加而线性上升;G衰减关系随H的增加呈现规律性降低。试验结果表明:原状土G与土层深度H存在一定相关,据此提出了分别基于土层深度H和Hardin模型的G预测方法,用以预测各类原状土在不同深度下的Gmax及其在各应变范围内的G。通过3种预测方法的对比分析,得出基于土层深度H的G预测方法最具优势,并且通过对渤海海域原状土数据的重新处理进一步验证了该方法的适用性。

关键词: 原状粉质黏土, 原状粉土, 动剪切模量, 土层深度, Hardin模型, 预测方法

Abstract: A series of resonant column tests was carried out on undisturbed silty clay and silt in the same borehole from surface to bedrock in the estuary of the Yangtze River. Then the variation law of dynamic shear modulus G with soil depth H was explored within various strain ranges in the same undisturbed soil. It was found that the G in the various strain ranges of undisturbed silty clay and silt increased regularly with the increase of H. Meanwhile, the maximum dynamic shear modulus Gmax linearly increased with the increase of H, whereas the attenuation relationship of G decreased with the increase of H. The experimental results showed that the G of the undisturbed soil was correlated with the soil depth H. Based on the soil depth H and Hardin model, the G prediction method was put forward accordingly to predict the Gmax of each kind of undisturbed soil at different depths and their G within various strain ranges. According to the comparison and analysis of three kinds of G prediction methods, the G prediction method based on soil depth H was the most advantageous. In addition, the applicability of the method was further verified by re-processing the data of undisturbed marine soil in Bohai sea area.

Key words: undisturbed silty clay, undisturbed silt, dynamic shear modulus, soil depth, Hardin model, prediction method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 442
[1] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 杭天柱, 刘抗, 何杨, . 砂类土最大动剪切模量的新预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1963-1970.
[2] 范日东, 杜延军, 刘松玉, 杨玉玲, . 无机盐溶液作用下砂−膨润土竖向隔离屏障 材料化学相容性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 736-746.
[3] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[4] 梁珂, 何杨, 陈国兴, . 南沙珊瑚砂的动剪切模量和阻尼比特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 23-31.
[5] 张 炜,李 亚,周松望,蒋正波,吴 非,梁文洲,. 南海北部区域黏土循环动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2413-2423.
[6] 孔纲强,李 辉,王忠涛,文 磊,. 透明砂土与天然砂土动力特性对比[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1935-1940.
[7] 丁祖德,黄 娟,袁铁映,彭立敏,王志良,. 昆明泥炭质土动剪切模量与阻尼比的试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3627-3634.
[8] 胡秀青,董全杨,吕程伟,王 军,庄心善,. 水泥土搅拌桩软土地基土体动力特性的共振柱试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 343-348.
[9] 尹 松 ,张先伟 ,孔令伟 ,Hossain Md Sayem ,  . 海洋沉积土动剪切模量与阻尼比的试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 459-464.
[10] 张希栋,骆亚生. 双向动荷载下黄土的动剪切模量特性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2591-2598.
[11] 蔡海兵 ,彭立敏 ,郑腾龙,. 隧道水平冻结壁强制解冻期地表沉降的预测方法[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3516-3522.
[12] 孙志亮,孔令伟,郭爱国,田 海. 应力比与含水状态对松散堆积体动力参数及地表反应谱的影响[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2765-2772.
[13] 张 华 ,胡文龙 ,陈善雄,. 一种非饱和土表层蒸发过程的预测方法[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 129-134.
[14] 张 宇,余 飞,陈善雄,李 剑. CAS-1模拟月壤动剪切模量与阻尼比的试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 74-82.
[15] 张如林 ,楼梦麟 . 基于达维坚科夫骨架曲线的软土非线性动力本构模型研究[J]. , 2012, 33(9): 2588-2594.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!