岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 440-448.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0206

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

大面积填土场地中摩擦型桩负摩阻力分布特性研究

叶观宝1, 2,郑文强1, 2,张 振1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-26 出版日期:2019-08-01 发布日期:2019-08-17
  • 通讯作者: 张振,男,1984年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事软基处理研究与教学工作。E-mail: dyzhangzhen@126.com E-mail:ygb1030@126.com
  • 作者简介:叶观宝,男,1964年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事软土地基处理技术及理论研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.41772281,No.51508408);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.22120180106)。

Investigation on distribution of negative friction of frictional piles in large filling sites

YE Guan-bao1, 2, ZHENG Wen-qiang1, 2, ZHANG Zhen1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2019-01-26 Online:2019-08-01 Published:2019-08-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (41772281, 51508408) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (22120180106).

摘要: 中国大面积场地形成工程日益增多,在缓解土地供求矛盾的同时也带来了诸多工程问题,如场地大面积沉降会造成桩基负摩阻力增加,影响桩基安全性,但针对大面积填土场地中桩基负摩阻力研究成果较少。结合某现场试验,建立了单桩有限元分析模型,与实测数据对比验证模型的合理性。基于验证后的数值分析模型,研究了大面积填土场地工程中填土天然重度及厚度、桩顶和地表荷载及场地形成时间对摩擦型桩下拉荷载和中性点的影响。结果表明,填土厚度和桩顶荷载的变化显著影响中性点的位置;填土的天然重度和厚度越大,下拉荷载越大;场地固结时间越长,下拉荷载越小;减小桩顶荷载和增加地表堆载会增大下拉荷载。敏感度分析表明,相比荷载因素,场地形成因素对下拉荷载及桩顶沉降影响更为显著。最后,结合国内外规范讨论了考虑大面积填土场地中摩擦型桩负摩阻力计算方法的适用性。研究结果对大面积填土场地摩擦型桩设计具有参考价值。

关键词: 摩擦型桩, 负摩阻力, 场地形成, 有限元分析, 软土

Abstract: In recent years, the number of large-area filling sites projects have been greatly increased in China. This can alleviate contradictions between supply and demand of construction lands. However, it also gives rise to many engineering problems. For example, subsidence of large area site increases negative skin friction(NSF) on pile shaft, which affects the pile safety. However, there have been limit studies on NSF of frictional piles occur in large area filling sites. Based on a field test, a single pile finite element analysis model is established, and the rationality of the model is verified by comparing with the measured data. Based on the verified numerical model, influences of weight and thickness of fill, load on pile head, surcharge loading and field consolidation time on skin friction of a single frictional pile are studied. The results show that fill thickness and load on pile head play major influences on neutral point position. An increased negative frictional force is associated with an increase in thickness and weight of fill, and a reduction in fill consolidation time. It is also linked to a reduction of load on pile head and increase in surcharge. Sensitivity analysis show that factors related to fill formation play a more significant role in NSF of pile shaft than the loading factors. The applicability of the common design methods used at home and overseas, calculating the NSF of frictional pile in large filling sites is discussed. The results can provide guidance for engineering application of frictional pile in large filling sites.

Key words: frictional pile, negative friction, site formation, finite element analysis, soft clay

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[2] 张雪东, 蔡红, 魏迎奇, 张紫涛, 梁建辉, 胡晶. 基于动力离心试验的软基尾矿库地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1287-1294.
[3] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[4] 贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[5] 雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[6] 张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层 变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[7] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 章涵, 周昌, 龚辉, . 嵌岩桩负摩阻力现场试验与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3610-3617.
[8] 龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[9] 张 奎, 赵成刚, 李伟华. 海底软土层对海洋地基场地动力响应的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2456-2468.
[10] 蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周 洋, 闫 婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[11] 杨爱武, 潘亚轩, 曹 宇, 尚英杰, 吴可龙, . 吹填软土低位真空预压室内试验及其数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 539-548.
[12] 周建, 蔡露, 罗凌晖, 应宏伟, . 各向异性软土基坑抗隆起稳定极限平衡分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4848-4856.
[13] 杨鹏, 蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹. 竖井地基的大应变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4049-4056.
[14] 吴建涛, 叶 霄, 李国维, 蒋 超, 曹雪山, . 高路堤下PHC桩加固软土地基的承载及变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 351-358.
[15] 郭红仙, 周 鼎. 软土中基坑土钉支护稳定性问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 398-404.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!