岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 400-408.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0618

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

岩土工程最小勘探数据量确定方法

田密1, 2,盛小涛3   

  1. 1. 湖北工业大学 土木建筑与环境学院,湖北 武汉 430068;2. 武汉大学 水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072; 3. 长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-01 出版日期:2019-08-01 发布日期:2019-08-17
  • 作者简介:田密,女,1988年生,博士,主要从事岩土工程可靠度与风险分析方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51579093);武汉大学水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室开放基金项目(No.RMHSE1905);湖北工业大学博士科研启动基金项目(No.BSQD2017034)。

Method for determining minimum test data quantity for geotechnical engineering investigation

TIAN Mi1, 2, SHENG Xiao-tao3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of Education Ministry, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China;3. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2019-04-01 Online:2019-08-01 Published:2019-08-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51579093), Open Research Fund of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of Ministry of Education, Wuhan University(RMHSE1905), and Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Hubei University of Technology (BSQD2017034).

摘要: 准确地确定岩土设计参数统计特征值诸如均值、标准差是岩土工程可靠度分析与设计的重要前提。在满足岩土设计参数统计特征值计算精度条件下,文中提出了岩土工程最小勘探数据量的确定方法,定义了相对误差和相对变异性指标衡量岩土设计参数统计特征值计算准确性。系统地分析了静力触探试验数据量对砂土有效内摩擦角统计特征值计算精度的影响,并且根据相对误差和相对变异性指标确定了静力触探最小勘探数据量。研究结果表明,由静力触探试验间接估计砂土有效内摩擦角时均值相对误差较低,砂土有效内摩擦角相对变异性指标随静力触探试验数据量的增加而降低,即由认知不足引起的不确定性占总变异性的比值随静力触探试验数据量的增加而减小;当砂土有效内摩擦角容许相对变异性指标小于0.2时砂土有效内摩擦角在最大变异(COV=20%)与最小变异性(COV=5%)范围内,满足预定要求所需的最小静力触探试验数据量为10~100;若容许相对变异性指标小于0.3,所需的最小静力触探试验数据量为5~43。此外,间接估计岩土设计参数时经验回归模型不确定性对最小勘探数据量有显著影响。静力触探试验最小勘探数据量随经验回归模型不确定性的增大而增加,在确定岩土设计参数统计特征值时应尽量广泛收集勘探数据并选择精度较高的计算模型。

关键词: 勘探数据量, 岩土参数, 统计特征值, 变异性, 模型不确定性

Abstract: Accurate determination of statistical characteristic values (e.g. mean and standard deviation) of geotechnical design parameters is an important prerequisite for geotechnical reliability analysis and design. In this paper, under the condition of satisfying the accuracy of statistical design of geotechnical design parameters, a new method is proposed to determine the minimum test data quantity of geotechnical engineering. The relative error and relative variability index are defined to measure the accuracy of the statistical characteristics of geotechnical design parameters. The influence of the static cone penetration test data on the calculation accuracy of the statistical characteristic value of effective internal friction angle of sand soil is systematically analyzed. Moreover, the minimum cone penetration test data quantity is determined based on the relative error and relative variability index. The results show that the relative error of mean value of internal friction angle of sand estimated indirectly from static cone penetration test is small. The relative variability index of sand internal friction angle decreases with the increasing in the data quantity of static cone penetration test. The ratio of uncertainty caused by insufficient cognition to total variability decreases with the increasing data quantity of static cone penetration test. When the allowable relative variability is less than 0.2, the variability of sand internal friction angle is in the range of 5% and 20% COV, which satisfies the predetermined requirement of minimum static cone penetration test data quantity of 10-100. If the relative variability is allowed to be less than 0.3, the minimum static cone penetration test data quantity is 5-43. In addition, when estimating the geotechnical parameters, the uncertainty of empirical regression model has a significant influence on the minimum data quantity. The minimum data quantity of static cone penetration test increases with the increasing uncertainty of empirical regression model. Therefore, the test data should be collected as widely as possible and the calculation model should be selected with higher accuracy to obtain more accurate statistical characteristic values of geotechnical design parameters.

Key words: test data quantity, geotechnical parameters, statistical characteristic values, variability, model uncertainty

中图分类号: 

  • TU443
[1] 薛阳, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 廖康, 张龙飞. 库水升降条件下考虑饱和渗透系数空间变异性的白水河滑坡渗流变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[2] 蒋水华, 冯泽文, 刘贤, 姜清辉, 黄劲松, 周创兵. 基于自适应贝叶斯更新方法的岩 土参数概率分布推断[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 325-335.
[3] 于 正, 杨龙才, 张 勇, 赵 伟, . 考虑地层变异特征一致性的围岩变形不确定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1947-1956.
[4] 费锁柱, 谭晓慧, 孙志豪, 杜林枫. 基于微结构模拟的土体自相关距离分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4751-4758.
[5] 张文生, 罗 强, 蒋良潍, 李 昂, . 小样本岩土参数下考虑矩估计偏差的 土质边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 315-324.
[6] 程红战,陈 健,胡之锋,黄珏皓, . 考虑砂土抗剪强度空间变异性的盾构开挖面稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3047-3054.
[7] 郭重阳,李典庆,曹子君,高国辉,唐小松. 考虑空间变异性条件下的边坡稳定可靠度高效敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2203-2210.
[8] 蒋水华,曾绍慧,杨建华,姚 池,黄劲松,周创兵,. 不排水抗剪强度非平稳随机场模拟及边坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1071-1081.
[9] 田 密, 张 帆, 李丽华, . 间接测量数据条件下岩土参数空间变异性 定量分析方法对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4673-4680.
[10] 郑 栋,李典庆,曹子君,方国光, . 土体参数空间变异性对边坡失效模式间相关性及系统可靠度的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 517-524.
[11] 田 密,李典庆,曹子君,方国光,王 宇,. 基于贝叶斯理论的土性参数空间变异性量化方法[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3355-3362.
[12] 李静萍 ,程勇刚 ,李典庆 ,常晓林 , . 基于多重响应面法的空间变异土坡系统可靠度分析[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 147-155.
[13] 吴兴正 ,蒋良潍 ,罗 强 ,孔德惠 ,张 良 , . 路堤边坡稳定可靠度计算中的模型不确定性分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 665-672.
[14] 邹海峰,蔡国军,刘松玉,林 军. 基于地质统计学方法的孔压静力触探锥尖阻力固有空间变异性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 403-407.
[15] 蒋水华 ,李典庆,. 考虑参数空间变异性多层土坡系统可靠度分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 629-633.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!