岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 2943-2952.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1905

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

插拔桩靴对临近桩靴承载力的影响研究

刘润,曹添铭,陈广思,张海洋,李成凤   

  1. 天津大学 水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室,天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-07 修回日期:2020-03-31 出版日期:2020-09-11 发布日期:2020-10-21
  • 作者简介:刘润,女,1974年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事海洋岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家杰出青年科学基金(No.51825904);国家自然科学基金项目(No.51709199)

Experimental study of the effect of spudcan penetration and extraction on bearing capacity of an adjacent spudcan

LIU Run, CAO Tian-ming, CHEN Guang-si, ZHANG Hai-yang, LI Cheng-feng   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2019-11-07 Revised:2020-03-31 Online:2020-09-11 Published:2020-10-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (51825904) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51709199).

摘要: 自升式钻井船桩靴的插拔过程将会对临近井口平台的桩靴基础产生不利影响。开展了室内模型试验研究,将试验结果与理论分析结果相结合,得到了桩靴插拔的影响范围及影响范围内土体强度的变化规律,并推导了桩靴插拔影响区内临近桩靴承载力的计算方法,与模型试验结果进行了对比验证。研究表明,桩靴插拔后砂土相对密实度降低,其降低程度随距桩靴距离的增加而逐渐减小,影响范围约为1倍桩靴直径。受桩靴插拔影响,临近桩靴的承载力下降,降低比例随两桩靴相对间距的增大而减小,随桩靴相对插深的增加而增加。当两桩靴相对间距大于2倍插拔桩靴直径时,可认为桩靴插拔对临近桩靴基础承载力无影响。

关键词: 自升式钻井船, 桩靴插拔, 承载力, 模型试验

Abstract: The penetration and extraction process of the spudcan of jack-up drilling platform may adversely affect the spudcan of the adjacent wellhead platform. The effect of soil strength and the influenced region after the penetration and extraction of spudcan were examined by performing the model tests and the theoretical analysis. A theoretical method for calculating the bearing capacity of an adjacent spudcan within the influenced region of the spudcan penetration and extraction is developed and compared with the model test results. The results demonstrate that, the relative compaction of sand is reduced after spudcan penetration and extraction, and the rate of reduction gradually decreases with increasing distance to the spudcan. The influenced region of the surrounding soil is approximately one times the diameter of the spudcan. The bearing capacity of adjacent spudcan is reduced due to the spudcan penetration and extraction, and the reduction rate of the bearing capacity decreases as the relative distance between two spudcans increases and increases as the relative penetration depth between two spudcans increases. When the relative distance between two spudcans is greater than 2 times the diameter of the spudcan, it can be considered that the spudcan penetration and extraction have no effect on the bearing capacity of the adjacent spudcan foundation.

Key words: jack-up drilling platform, spudcan penetration and extraction, bearing capacity, model tests

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 张纪蒙, 张陈蓉, 张凯, . 砂土中大直径单桩水平循环加载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 783-789.
[2] 郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 景丹, . 不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 324-332.
[3] 万志辉, 戴国亮, 龚维明, 高鲁超, 徐艺飞, . 钙质砂后压浆桩水平承载性状模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 411-418.
[4] 肖捷夫, 李云安, 胡勇, 张申, 蔡浚明, . 库水涨落和降雨条件下古滑坡变形特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 471-480.
[5] 黄朝煊, 袁文喜, 胡国杰, . 成层软土地基预固结处理后桩基水平 承载力估算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 113-124.
[6] 史江伟, 范燕波, 裴伟伟, 陈永辉, 张显, . 盾构下穿非连续管线变形特性及预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 143-150.
[7] 刘春林, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 岳云鹏, 侯振坤, 陈航, . 考虑桩底沉渣的随钻跟管桩竖向承载 特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 177-185.
[8] 李建东, 王旭, 张延杰, 蒋代军, 刘德仁, 李盛, . 水蒸气增湿非饱和黄土热湿迁移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 186-192.
[9] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[10] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[11] 曾超峰, 薛秀丽, 宋伟炜, 李淼坤, 白宁. 开挖前降水引发基坑变形机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2963-2972.
[12] 胡伟, 孟建伟, 姚琛, 雷勇, . 浅埋平板圆锚竖向拉拔极限承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3049-3055.
[13] 罗易, 张家铭, 周峙, 契霍特金, 米敏, 沈筠, . 降雨-蒸发条件下土体开裂临界 含水率演变规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2592-2600.
[14] 丁楚, 余文瑞, 史江伟, 张宇亭, 陈永辉, . 水平循环荷载下桩基变形特性的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2659-2664.
[15] 万志辉, 戴国亮, 高鲁超, 龚维明, . 大直径后压浆灌注桩承载力和沉降的 实用计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2746-2755.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 王淑云,鲁晓兵,赵 京,王爱兰. 粉质黏土周期荷载后的不排水强度衰化特性[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2991 -2995 .
[3] 朱泽奇,盛 谦,梅松华,张占荣. 改进的遍布节理模型及其在层状岩体地下工程中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3115 -3121 .
[4] 尤红兵,赵凤新,李方杰. 层状场地中局部不均体对平面P波的散射[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3133 -3138 .
[5] 徐远杰,潘家军,刘祖德. 混凝土面板堆石坝的一种坝坡修整算法[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3139 -3144 .
[6] 李少龙,张家发,张 伟,肖 利. 表层土渗透系数空间变异与随机模拟研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3168 -3172 .
[7] 王 刚,蒋宇静,王渭明,李廷春. 新型数控岩石节理剪切渗流试验台的设计与应用[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3200 -3209 .
[8] 孙德安. 非饱和土的水力和力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3217 -3231 .
[9] 孙文静,孙德安,孟德林. 饱和膨润土及其与砂混合物的压缩变形特性[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3249 -3255 .
[10] 贾宇峰,迟世春,林 皋. 考虑颗粒破碎影响的粗粒土本构模型[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3261 -3266 .