高速铁路无砟轨道地基泥岩膨胀性分类分级研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2134

岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 3109-3118.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2134

高速铁路无砟轨道地基泥岩膨胀性分类分级研究

薛彦瑾^{1, 2}，王起才^{1, 2}，马丽娜^{1, 2}，张戎令^{1, 2}，代金鹏^{1, 2}，王强^{1, 2}

1. 兰州交通大学道桥工程灾害防治技术国家地方联合工程实验室，甘肃兰州 730070； 2. 兰州交通大学甘肃省道路桥梁与地下工程重点实验室，甘肃兰州 730070

收稿日期:2019-12-22 修回日期:2020-03-24 出版日期:2020-09-11 发布日期:2020-10-22
通讯作者: 王起才，男，1962年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事混凝土结构耐久性、新型工程材料与技术研究E-mail：13909486262@139.com E-mail:yanjinx@mail.lzjtu.cn
作者简介:薛彦瑾，男，1991年生，博士研究生，助教，主要从事高速铁无砟轨道路基上拱病害研究。
基金资助:
长江学者和创新团队发展计划滚动支持（IRT_15R29）；兰州交通大学青年科学基金项目（2020009）

Expansibility classification of mudstone for high-speed railway ballastless track foundation

XUE Yan-jin^{1, 2}, WANG Qi-cai^{1, 2}, MA Li-na^{1, 2}, ZHANG Rong-ling^{1, 2}, DAI Jin-peng^{1, 2}, WANG Qiang^{1, 2}

1. National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for Disaster Prevention and Control Technology of Road and Bridge Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Road, Bridge and Underground Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China

Received:2019-12-22 Revised:2020-03-24 Online:2020-09-11 Published:2020-10-22
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Changjiang Scholars and Innovation Team Development Plan (IRT_15R29) and the Youth Science Foundation of Lanzhou Jiaotong University (2020009).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 红层泥岩是一种典型侏罗系沉积岩，其含有微量黏土矿物，易遇水软化、失水崩解，具有一定膨胀性，是引起兰新高速铁路路基持续上拱变形的一个重要因素，故重新判定该种土体膨胀性对高速铁路无砟轨道设计和施工具有重要意义。为此，选取等效蒙脱石含量、阳离子交换量、自由膨胀率和液限为泥岩膨胀性判别指标，通过兰新高速铁路上拱地段大量钻孔实测资料，提出了泥岩膨胀等级分级标准，采用改进层次分析法、基尼系数法和直觉模糊理论确定了判别指标组合权重，基于逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS法)建立了泥岩膨胀性直觉模糊综合评价模型。结果表明：直觉模糊综合评价模型将泥岩膨胀性进行了定量化，克服了同一试样不同指标属于不同等级判别缺陷；室内膨胀量试验验证了膨胀等级分级标准和直觉模糊综合评价模型对兰新高铁地基泥岩适用性和准确性。研究成果对地基红层泥岩高速铁路路基长期持续上拱变形风险评估和工程控制措施提供技术支撑。

关键词: 高速铁路, 路基上拱, 膨胀性泥岩, 直觉模糊集, 分类分级

Abstract: Red mudstone is a typical Jurassic sedimentary rock. It contains trace clay minerals, which is easy to soften in water, disintegrate when dehydrated, and has a certain swelling property. Red mudstone is an important factor that causes the continuous uplift of the subgrade for the Lan-Xin high-speed railway. Therefore, it is of great significance to redefine the expansibility of this kind of soil for the design and construction of ballastless track of high-speed railway. For this reason, the equivalent smectite content, cation exchange capacity, free expansion rate and liquid limit are selected as the indicators of mudstone expansion. The classification criteria for the expansion potential of the mudstone in the foundation are determined through a large number of field testing data. The weight of classification index combination is determined by using improved analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Gini coefficient method and intuitionistic fuzzy theory. The intuitionistic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of foundation mudstone swelling property is established based on the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS method). The intuitionistic fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model quantifies mudstone swelling, and overcomes the shortcomings of different indicators of the same sample belonging to different levels. The applicability and accuracy of mudstone classification standard and intuitionistic fuzzy theory evaluation method to Lan-Xin high-speed railway are verified by laboratory expansion tests. The research results provide technical support for the risk assessment and control of long-term continuous uplift of red mudstone foundation for high-speed railway subgrade.

Key words: high speed railway, upheaval arch, expansive mudstone, intuitionistic fuzzy set, classification

中图分类号:

TU 432

薛彦瑾, 王起才, 马丽娜, 张戎令, 代金鹏, 王强, . 高速铁路无砟轨道地基泥岩膨胀性分类分级研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3109-3118.

XUE Yan-jin, WANG Qi-cai, MA Li-na, ZHANG Rong-ling, DAI Jin-peng, WANG Qiang, . Expansibility classification of mudstone for high-speed railway ballastless track foundation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(9): 3109-3118.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	张晓磊, 冯世进, 李义成, 王雷, . 路基高架过渡段高铁运行引起的地表振动现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 187-194.
[2]	庄妍, 李劭邦, 崔晓艳, 董晓强, 王康宇, . 高铁荷载下桩承式路基动力响应及土拱效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3119-3130.
[3]	杨长卫, 童心豪, 王栋, 谭信荣, 郭雪岩, 曹礼聪, . 地震作用下有砟轨道路基动力响应规律振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[4]	屈畅姿, 康凯, 魏丽敏, 郭坤, 何群, 王永和, . 高铁路-涵过渡段路基动力响应特性及长期动力稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3432-3242.
[5]	宋宏芳, 岳祖润, 李佰林, 张松, . 季节冻土区高速铁路防冻胀路基保温强化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4041-4048.
[6]	谢涛，罗强，周成，张良，蒋良潍, . 高速铁路小变形下陡坡地基路肩桩板墙力学响应[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 45-52.
[7]	邱明明，杨啸，杨果林，房以河,. 云桂高速铁路新型全封闭路堑基床动响应特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(2): 537-544.
[8]	姜领发，熊署丹，陈善雄，许锡昌，. 列车荷载作用下高铁路基速度传递规律模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 265-269.
[9]	薛富春，张建民　, 　. 移动荷载下高铁路基段振动加速度频谱衰减特性[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 445-451.
[10]	梁鑫，程谦恭，陈建明，李良广，. 采空区上方高速铁路桥梁群桩基础模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1865-1876.
[11]	李波，吴立，邓宗伟，陈剑，唐爱松,. 高速铁路隧道围岩抗力系数现场试验与理论研究[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 532-541.
[12]	刘华，牛富俊，牛永红，许健,. 结构型式对寒区高铁路基冻结特征影响试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3135-3142.
[13]	李传宝，程谦恭，梁鑫，张世亮，. 采空巷道上方高速铁路桩板路基模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(11): 3101-3110.
[14]	时瑾，邹凯，谷爱军，江辉，梁青槐. 高速铁路高架线路列车运营对既有线路基的影响研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 285-290.
[15]	付强，丁选明，刘汉龙，孔纲强,. 列车激振荷载下PCC桩复合地基动力分析[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 413-420.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

高速铁路无砟轨道地基泥岩膨胀性分类分级研究

Expansibility classification of mudstone for high-speed railway ballastless track foundation

PDF (Chinese)

PDF (English)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10