岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 3573-3582.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0237

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

黏土地基中桩顶扭矩-竖向荷载加载路径下 单桩承载特性分析

江杰1, 2, 3,王顺苇1, 2, 3,欧孝夺1, 2, 3,付臣志1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 广西大学 土木建筑工程学院,广西 南宁 530004;2. 广西大学 工程防灾与结构安全教育部重点试验室,广西 南宁 530004; 3. 广西大学 广西防灾减灾与工程安全重点试验室,广西 南宁 530004
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-25 修回日期:2020-04-13 出版日期:2020-11-11 发布日期:2020-12-24
  • 作者简介:江杰,男,1979年生,博士(后),研究员,主要从事复杂受力环境的桩基础理论与应用研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52068004, No. 51568006, No. 51978179);广西自然科学基金(No. 2018JJA160134);广西重点研发计划项目(桂科AB19245018)。

Analysis of the bearing characteristics of single pile under the T→V loading path in clay ground

JIANG Jie1, 2, 3, WANG Shun-wei1, 2, 3, OU Xiao-duo1, 2, 3, FU Chen-zhi1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of Ministry of Education, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 3. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Engineering Safety, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China
  • Received:2020-02-25 Revised:2020-04-13 Online:2020-11-11 Published:2020-12-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52068004, 51568006, 51978179), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (2018JJA160134) and Guangxi Key Research and Development Program (AB19245018).

摘要: 为探讨黏土地基中桩顶扭矩(T)与竖向荷载(V)共同作用下单桩的承载特性,对桩顶预加T后施加V,基于室内模型试验结果,结合边界元法对T→V加载路径下桩侧竖向极限摩阻力进行合理假设,采用MATLAB编制程序求得单桩在T→V加载路径下的非线性解,从而得到其承载力包络线。为方便应用于工程实际,对试验结果进行拟合,得出T→V加载路径下单桩承载力近似包络线表达式。研究表明:随着桩顶扭矩的增加,单桩承受竖向荷载的能力降低,且当扭矩荷载分量超过其极限值1/3时T-V组合效应更加明显;随着长径比 的增加,单桩的承载能力及抵抗变形的能力均在增强,且桩身变形主要发生在0~0.6L范围,因此对浅基础进行加固可以有效地减小变形;T→V加载路径下单桩的竖向极限承载力随着桩身弹性模量的增加而提高,但弹性模量增加10倍时,竖向极限承载力仅仅增加了26.74%,因此不宜通过提高混凝土标号来提高桩-土体系极限承载力。

关键词: T→V加载路径, 单桩, 模型试验, 边界元法, 承载特性

Abstract: To explore the bearing characteristics of single pile under the combined action of torque (T) and vertical load (V) on the pile top in clay foundation, vertical load was applied after preloading the torque to pile top. Based on the results of laboratory model tests and combined with the boundary element method, a reasonable assumption was made for the vertical ultimate friction resistance of pile side under the T→V loading path. The nonlinear solution of single pile under the T→V loading path was obtained by MATLAB programming, and then the bearing capacity envelope was plotted. To facilitate its application in engineering design, the expression of the failure envelops for the bearing capacity of single pile under the T→V loading path was obtained by fitting the experimental data. The results show that the vertical bearing capacity decreases with the increase of torque on single pile, and the T-V combination effect becomes more obvious when the torque load exceeds one third of the limit value. Both the bearing capacity and the deforming resistance of single pile are strengthened with the increase of length-diameter ratio, and the deformation of pile shaft mainly occurs in the range of 0~0.6L. Therefore, the reinforcement of shallow foundation can effectively reduce the deformation. The vertical ultimate bearing capacity of single pile improved with the increase of elastic modulus of pile shaft under the T→V loading path. Nevertheless, the vertical ultimate bearing capacity was only increased by 26.74% when the elastic modulus of single pile increased by 10 times. Therefore, it is not advisable to improve the ultimate bearing capacity of pile-soil system by increasing the concrete grade.

Key words: T→V loading path, single pile, model test, boundary element method, bearing characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 张纪蒙, 张陈蓉, 张凯, . 砂土中大直径单桩水平循环加载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 783-789.
[2] 郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 景丹, . 不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 324-332.
[3] 万志辉, 戴国亮, 龚维明, 高鲁超, 徐艺飞, . 钙质砂后压浆桩水平承载性状模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 411-418.
[4] 肖捷夫, 李云安, 胡勇, 张申, 蔡浚明, . 库水涨落和降雨条件下古滑坡变形特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 471-480.
[5] 史江伟, 范燕波, 裴伟伟, 陈永辉, 张显, . 盾构下穿非连续管线变形特性及预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 143-150.
[6] 刘春林, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 岳云鹏, 侯振坤, 陈航, . 考虑桩底沉渣的随钻跟管桩竖向承载 特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 177-185.
[7] 李建东, 王旭, 张延杰, 蒋代军, 刘德仁, 李盛, . 水蒸气增湿非饱和黄土热湿迁移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 186-192.
[8] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[9] 刘润, 曹添铭, 陈广思, 张海洋, 李成凤. 插拔桩靴对临近桩靴承载力的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2943-2952.
[10] 曾超峰, 薛秀丽, 宋伟炜, 李淼坤, 白宁. 开挖前降水引发基坑变形机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2963-2972.
[11] 胡伟, 孟建伟, 姚琛, 雷勇, . 浅埋平板圆锚竖向拉拔极限承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3049-3055.
[12] 罗易, 张家铭, 周峙, 契霍特金, 米敏, 沈筠, . 降雨-蒸发条件下土体开裂临界 含水率演变规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2592-2600.
[13] 丁楚, 余文瑞, 史江伟, 张宇亭, 陈永辉, . 水平循环荷载下桩基变形特性的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2659-2664.
[14] 万建宏, 郑翔之, 欧阳苇航, 刘思威, 黎学优. 基于高性能有限单元的单桩稳定性分析法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2805-2813.
[15] 邓玮婷, 丁选明, 彭宇, . 珊瑚砂地基中膨胀混凝土桩竖向受压承载性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2814-2820.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[2] 杜佐龙,黄茂松,李 早. 基于地层损失比的隧道开挖对临近群桩影响的DCM方法[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3043 -3047 .
[3] 温 森,赵延喜,杨圣奇. 基于Monte Carlo-BP神经网络TBM掘进速度预测[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3127 -3132 .
[4] 孙德安. 非饱和土的水力和力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3217 -3231 .
[5] 朱珍德,李道伟,蒋志坚,刘金辉,杨永杰. 温度循环作用下深埋隧洞围岩细观结构的定量描述[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3237 -3241 .
[6] 张 凯,周 辉,冯夏庭,房敬年,张元刚. Biot固结理论中连续性方程形式的讨论[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3273 -3277 .
[7] 孔位学,芮勇勤,董宝弟. 岩土材料在非关联流动法则下剪胀角选取探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3278 -3282 .
[8] 翟聚云,卫国祥. 干密度对非饱和膨胀土水分迁移参数的影响[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3337 -3341 .
[9] 朱训国,杨 庆. 全长注浆岩石锚杆中性点影响因素分析研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3386 -3392 .
[10] 亓 乐,施建勇,曹 权. 刚性桩复合地基垫层合理厚度确定方法[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3423 -3428 .