岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 3583-3590.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0554

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

双孔结构非饱和压实土微观结构演化模型

蔡国庆1, 2,吴天驰2,王亚南2,刘祎2,李舰1, 2,赵成刚1, 2   

  1. 1. 北京交通大学 城市地下工程教育部重点实验室,北京 100044;2. 北京交通大学 土木建筑工程学院,北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-09 修回日期:2020-04-13 出版日期:2020-11-11 发布日期:2020-12-24
  • 作者简介:蔡国庆,男,1983年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事非饱和土基本特性及多场耦合理论的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 52078031, No. 51722802, No. U1834206);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(No. 2020CZ002);北京市自然科学基金(No. 8202038)

Model of the microstructure evolution of unsaturated compacted soils with double-pore structure

CAI Guo-qing1, 2, WU Tian-chi2, WANG Ya-nan2, LIU Yi2, LI Jian1, 2, ZHAO Cheng-gang1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2020-01-09 Revised:2020-04-13 Online:2020-11-11 Published:2020-12-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078031, 51722802, U1834206), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2020CZ002) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (8202038).

摘要: 在最优含水率干侧压实的黏土一般具有明显的双孔结构,其集聚体间孔隙(又称宏观孔隙)和集聚体内孔隙(又称微观孔隙)对土体宏观水力和力学特性影响差异显著,同时,水-力耦合作用下两种孔隙的演化规律也存在明显不同。双孔结构非饱和土对应的孔径分布函数为双峰孔径分布形式,该分布函数可通过叠加宏观孔隙和微观孔隙的单峰孔径分布曲线得到,并通过平移量、缩放量和分散度3个演化参数对双孔结构土的孔隙演化规律进行描述。通过构建在力学及水力加、卸载过程中演化参数与孔隙比之间的关系,提出了适用于描述变吸力下非饱和压实土的微观结构演化模型。分别基于所开展的桂林红黏土压汞试验数据和文献中的米尼亚卢博瓦膨胀土试验数据,对所建立的微观结构演化模型进行参数标定,并通过模型预测结果与试验结果的对比,验证了所建立模型的适用性。

关键词: 非饱和土, 双孔结构, 双峰孔径分布函数, 孔径演化

Abstract: Clay compacted at the dry side of optimal moisture content generally has a distinct double pore structure, inter-aggregate pore (also called macroscopic pore) and the intra-aggregate pore (also called microscopic pore). The significant difference of their influences on mechanical responses and water retention behaviors of soils leads to the discrepancy on the evolution rules of these two types of pores. The pore size distribution function of unsaturated soil with double pore structure is the bimodal pore size distribution form, which can be obtained by superposing the unimodal pore size distribution curves of macroscopic pores and microscopic pore. The evolution parameters of translation degree, scaling degree and dispersion degree, are adopted to describe the pore evolution rule of soils with double pore structure. Based on establishing the relationship between the evolution parameter and the porosity during mechanical and hydraulic loading and unloading, a model of the microstructural evolution of soils with dual-pore structure suitable for describing unsaturated compacted soils under variable suction was proposed. Based on the results of mercury intrusion tests on Guilin red clay and the test data of Minia Lubois expansive soil in the literature, the established model parameters were calibrated. The applicability and prediction accuracy of the model was verified by comparing the simulation results with test results.

Key words: unsaturated soil, double-pore structure, bimodal pore size distribution function, pore size evolution;

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 宋朝阳, 赵成刚, 韦昌富, 马田田, . 非饱和土平均粒间应力的计算及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2665-2674.
[2] 杨志浩, 岳祖润, 冯怀平, . 非饱和粉土路基内水分迁移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2241-2251.
[3] 陈昊, 胡小荣. 非饱和土三剪强度准则及验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2380-2388.
[4] 文伟, 赖远明, 尤哲敏, 李积锋, . 基于Pitzer离子模型的盐渍非饱和土孔隙 相对湿度计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1944-1952.
[5] 陶帅, 董毅, 韦昌富, . 环境湿度可控的土体小应变刚度试验系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2132-2142.
[6] 柳鸿博, 周凤玺, 岳国栋, 郝磊超. 非饱和土中热弹性波的传播特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1613-1624.
[7] 孙银磊, 汤连生, 刘洁, . 非饱和土微观结构与粒间吸力的研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1095-1122.
[8] 李潇旋, 李涛, 李舰, 张涛. 循环荷载下非饱和结构性黏土的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1153-1160.
[9] 李华, 李同录, 江睿君, 范江文. 基于滤纸法的非饱和渗透性曲线测试[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 895-904.
[10] 程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[11] 邓子千, 陈嘉帅, 王建伟, 刘小文, . 基于SFG模型的统一屈服面本构模型与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 527-534.
[12] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[13] 程昊, 唐辉明, 吴琼, 雷国平. 一种考虑水力滞回效应的非饱和土弹塑性扩展 剑桥本构模型显式算法有限元实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[14] 陈可, 曹文贵, 陈贺. 基于孔隙胀缩的土−水特征曲线滞后增量模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3236-3244.
[15] 刘祎, 蔡国庆, 李舰, 赵成刚, . 一个统一描述饱和−非饱和土温度效应的 热−弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3279-3288.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 郭军辉,程卫国,张 滨. 土工格栅低温下蠕变特性试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3009 -3012 .
[2] 康厚荣, ,雷明堂,张谢东,赵杰华. 贵州省公路工程岩溶环境区划[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3032 -3036 .
[3] 姜领发,陈善雄,于忠久. 饱和土中任意形状衬砌对稳态压缩波的散射[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3063 -3070 .
[4] 张民生,刘红军,李晓东,贾永刚,王秀海. 波浪作用下黄河口粉土液化与“铁板砂”形成机制的模拟试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3347 -3351 .
[5] 陈善雄,冯美果,许锡昌,陈守义. 某电厂贮灰坝失稳过程及破坏机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3365 -3371 .
[6] 任 松,姜德义,杨春和. 盐穴储气库破坏后地表沉陷规律数值模拟研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3595 -3601 .
[7] 毛昶熙,段祥宝,吴良骥. 砂砾土各级颗粒的管涌临界坡降研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3705 -3709 .
[8] 孙树林,李 方,谌 军. 掺石灰黏土电阻率试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 51 -55 .
[9] 王桂尧,李 斌,付宏渊. 非饱和路基土水分运移的室内试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 61 -65 .
[10] 齐吉琳,马 巍. 冻土的力学性质及研究现状[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 133 -143 .