岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 2611-2621.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0358

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    

原状黄土−古土壤中水分入渗过程研究

赵志强1,戴福初1,闵弘2,谭晔1   

  1. 1. 北京工业大学 城市建设学部,北京 100124;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-11 修回日期:2021-04-26 出版日期:2021-09-10 发布日期:2021-08-31
  • 通讯作者: 戴福初,男,1967年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质工程与地质灾害研究。E-mail: daifc@bjut.edu.cn E-mail:zhaozhiqiang6733@163.com
  • 作者简介:赵志强,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事灌溉作用下黄土滑坡诱发机制研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重大项目(No.41790440)。

Research on infiltration process in undisturbed loess-paleosol sequence

ZHAO Zhi-qiang1, DAI Fu-chu1, MIN Hong2, TAN Ye1   

  1. 1. Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2021-03-11 Revised:2021-04-26 Online:2021-09-10 Published:2021-08-31
  • Supported by:
    This work was funded by the Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(41790440).

摘要: 黄土塬区的农业灌溉致使地下水位不断升高,诱发了一系列黄土滑坡灾害。为探究灌溉水在黄土中的入渗过程,在陕西泾阳南塬开展了场地直径为20 m的原位浸水试验,监测得到了土体含水率和基质吸力的时空变化特征,并通过数值计算分析了浸水及间歇灌溉时水分的入渗规律。研究表明:塬边黄土的浸水入渗过程可分为均匀入渗、优势入渗和稳定入渗3个阶段,马兰黄土中存在竖向裂隙,当裂隙宽度大于2 mm且裂隙上部土体饱和后产生优势入渗;古土壤(S1)下部透水性较上部弱,湿润峰抵达S1下部时水分聚集而产生瞬态滞水;三维入渗数值计算再现了浸水入渗过程,多次灌溉条件下湿润锋的叠加效应促进水分入渗,且入渗强度随深度增加而减小,深度大于5.6 m时,水分入渗速率小于土体渗透系数,水分仅受重力下渗而含水率和基质吸力近似不变,这一发现解释了以往研究中深部黄土的水分入渗很难被监测到的现象。

关键词: 黄土, 现场监测, 灌溉入渗, 含水率, 基质吸力

Abstract: Agricultural irrigation in loess platform has led to a continuous rise of the groundwater level and triggered a series of loess landslides. To gain a better understanding of the infiltration behavior of irrigation water in loess, a field infiltration test with a diameter of 20 m was conducted on the South Jingyang tableland, Shaanxi province. The spatiotemporal characteristics of moisture content and matric suction were monitored. Then the infiltration laws under the conditions of soaking and intermittent irrigation were simulated. Results show that the soak infiltration can be divided into three stages, namely, uniform infiltration, preferential flow infiltration, and stable infiltration, respectively. Preferential flow associated with the vertical cracks in the Malan loess was observed when the width of the crack was more than 2 mm and the soil above the crack was saturated. The hydraulic conductivity of the lower part of paleosol layer (S1) was relatively weak compared to the upper part of S1, and a transient perched water was observed above the lower part of S1. The three-dimensional infiltration numerical model was established to reappear the soak infiltration process. Due to the multiple irrigation events, the downward percolation of water was significantly promoted by the superposition effect of wetting front. The infiltration capacity decreased with the increase of depth. The velocity of infiltration below 5.6 m depth was less than the hydraulic conductivity of the soil, the infiltration was driven solely by the gravity, and the moisture content and matric suction were almost unchanged. This finding explains the phenomenon that water infiltration in deep loess is difficult to be monitored in the previous studies.

Key words: loess, field monitoring, irrigation infiltration, moisture content, matric suction

中图分类号: 

  • TU444
[1] 李燕, 李同录, 侯晓坤, 李华, 张杰, . 用孔隙分布曲线预测压实黄土非饱和渗透曲 线及其适用范围的探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2395-2404.
[2] 葛苗苗, 李宁, 盛岱超, 朱才辉, PINEDA Jubert, . 水力耦合作用下非饱和压实黄土 细观变形机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2437-2448.
[3] 姜彤, 翟天雅, 张俊然, 赵金玓, 王俪锦, 宋陈雨, 潘旭威. 基于粒子图像测速技术的黄土径向劈裂试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2120-2126.
[4] 刘越, 陈东霞, 王晖, 于佳静, . 干湿循环下考虑裂隙发育的残积土边坡响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1933-1943.
[5] 张闯, 任松, 张平, 隆能增, . 水、孔洞及层理耦合作用下的千枚岩 巴西劈裂试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1612-1624.
[6] 郭智辉, 简文彬, 刘青灵, 聂闻. 基于现场原型试验的斜坡降雨入渗分析及 入渗模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1635-1647.
[7] 汪时机, 骆赵刚, 李贤, 文桃. 考虑局部含水率效应的浅层土体开裂 过程与力学机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1395-1403.
[8] 赵奎, 冉珊瑚, 曾鹏, 杨道学, 腾天野, . 含水率对红砂岩特征应力及声发射特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 899-908.
[9] 雷学文, 丁豪, 王新志, 沈建华, 孟庆山, . 钙质粉土的固结特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 909-920.
[10] 熊仲明, 吕世鸿, 李运良, 赵奇峰, 李进, 谭书舜, 张向荣, 朱玉荣, 姜磊, 杨琪凡, 张宁波, 张子栋. 被动围压下黄土动态力学性能与能量耗散研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 775-782.
[11] 李波波, 王忠晖, 任崇鸿, 张尧, 许江, 李建华, . 水-力耦合下煤岩力学特性及损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 315-323.
[12] 安宁, 晏长根, 王亚冲, 兰恒星, 包含, 许江波, 石玉玲, 孙巍锋, . 聚丙烯纤维加筋黄土抗侵蚀性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 501-510.
[13] 季伟伟, 孔纲强, 刘汉龙, 杨庆, . 软塑黄土地区隧道仰拱热力响应特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 558-564.
[14] 刘德仁, 徐硕昌, 肖洋, 王旭, 李建东, 张严, . 浸水入渗条件下压实黄土水−气运移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3260-3270.
[15] 郝延周, 王铁行, 程磊, 金鑫, . 考虑干湿循环影响的压实黄土结构性本构关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 2977-2986.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .