隧道开挖地表沉降动态预测及影响因素分析

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1201

岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 195-204.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1201

隧道开挖地表沉降动态预测及影响因素分析

江帅^{1, 2}，朱勇^{2, 3}，栗青¹，周辉^{2, 3}，涂洪亮^{2, 3}，杨凡杰^{2, 3}

1. 沈阳工业大学建筑与土木工程学院，辽宁沈阳 110870；2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室，湖北武汉 430071；3. 中国科学院大学，北京 100049

收稿日期:2021-08-03 修回日期:2021-09-10 出版日期:2022-01-10 发布日期:2022-01-07
通讯作者: 周辉，男，1972年生，博士，研究员，博士生导师，主要从事岩石力学试验、理论、数值分析与工程安全性分析方面的研究。 E-mail: hzhou@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:17854114851@163.com
作者简介:江帅，男，1995年生，硕士研究生，主要从事隧道及地下空间稳定性分析方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（No. 2019YFC0605104，No. 2019YFC0605103）；国家自然科学基金专项项目（No. 41941018）；中国科学院科技服务网络计划（STS计划）项目（No.KFJ-STS-QYZD-174）

Dynamic prediction and influence factors analysis of ground surface settlement during tunnel excavation

JIANG Shuai^{1, 2}, ZHU Yong^{2, 3}, LI Qing¹, ZHOU Hui^{2, 3}, TU Hong-liang^{2, 3}, YANG Fan-jie^{2, 3}

1. School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang , Liaoning 110870, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2021-08-03 Revised:2021-09-10 Online:2022-01-10 Published:2022-01-07
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (2019YFC0605104, 2019YFC0605103), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41941018) and the Science and Technology Service Network Initiative of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-STS-QYZD-174).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 城市地铁隧道施工不可避免地对围岩产生扰动引起地表沉降，动态预测隧道开挖引起的地表沉降是确保地表建构筑物与隧道施工安全的重要基础。针对隧道施工过程中地表沉降难以准确动态预测的问题，在定义纵向开挖度系数? 的基础上，建立横向地表沉降动态预测模型。该模型能够描述同一监测位置沉降曲线随掌子面推进而不断变化的规律，实现施工现场沉降动态预测。结果表明：在特定约束条件下，该模型能够退化为Peck模型以及随机介质理论预测模型；通过现场施工验证了该动态预测模型的准确性与适用性；基于纵向开挖度系数? 将隧道沿纵向分为强烈、中度和轻度共3个影响段，较好地反映了开挖掌子面在不同位置对同一监测截面的影响程度；通过分析建筑物和隔离桩对地表沉降曲线的影响可知，建筑物与其附近地层呈现出协同变形、共同承载的特征，在隧道一侧添加地质钻隔离桩对该侧地表沉降值的减小程度可达71.9%。研究成果对滇中引水工程现场施工与类似工程具有一定指导和借鉴意义。

关键词: 沉降预测模型, 动态预测, 纵向开挖度系数, 随机介质理论, 影响分段, 现场监测

Abstract: The construction of urban subway tunnel inevitably produces disturbance to surrounding rock and causes ground surface settlement. Dynamic prediction of ground surface settlement caused by tunnel excavation is an important method to ensure the safety of above-ground buildings and tunnel construction. In view of the difficulty of accurate dynamic prediction of ground surface settlement during tunnel construction, based on the definition of longitudinal excavation coefficient ? , a dynamic prediction model of lateral ground surface settlement is established. The model can accurately describe the variation of the settlement of the same monitoring location with the advancement of the tunnel face, and then realize the dynamic prediction of the ground surface settlement at the construction site. The results show that under certain constraints, this model can be degenerated into Peck model and stochastic medium theory prediction model. The accuracy and applicability of the dynamic prediction model are verified by on-site construction. The tunnel can be divided into three affected segments longitudinally (i.e., intense influence, moderate influence, and mild influence) based on the obtained ? , which well reflected the influence degree of the excavated tunnel face on the same monitoring section at different positions. Through the analysis of the influence of the buildings and isolation piles on the ground surface settlement curve, it can be found that the building and its adjacent ground surface present the characteristics of cooperative deformation and joint bearing. Moreover, installing geological drill isolation piles on the side of the tunnel can reduce the ground surface settlement of that side up to 71.9%. The research results have a certain guiding and reference significance for the on-site construction of the Central Yunnan Water Diversion Project and similar projects.

Key words: settlement prediction model, dynamic prediction, longitudinal excavation coefficient, stochastic medium theory, affected segmentation, on-site monitoring

中图分类号:

TU 452

江帅, 朱勇, 栗青, 周辉, 涂洪亮, 杨凡杰, . 隧道开挖地表沉降动态预测及影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 195-204.

JIANG Shuai, ZHU Yong, LI Qing, ZHOU Hui, TU Hong-liang, YANG Fan-jie, . Dynamic prediction and influence factors analysis of ground surface settlement during tunnel excavation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(1): 195-204.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	赵志强, 戴福初, 闵弘, 谭晔, . 原状黄土−古土壤中水分入渗过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2611-2621.
[2]	章定文, 刘志祥, 沈国根, 鄂俊宇, . 超大直径浅埋盾构隧道土压力实测分析及其计算方法适用性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 91-98.
[3]	何海杰, 兰吉武, 高武, 陈云敏, 马鹏程, 肖电坤, . 压缩空气排水井在填埋场滑移控制中的应用及分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 343-350.
[4]	董志宏, 丁秀丽, 黄书岭, 邬爱清, 陈胜宏, 周钟, . 高地应力区大型洞室锚索时效受力特征及长期承载风险分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 351-362.
[5]	吴建涛, 叶霄, 李国维, 蒋超, 曹雪山, . 高路堤下PHC桩加固软土地基的承载及变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 351-358.
[6]	陈晋龙，李锦辉，程鹏，宋磊，周腾. 植被作用下土质覆盖层渗透特性的现场试验[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 222-228.
[7]	许度，冯夏庭，李邵军，吴世勇，邱士利，周扬一，高要辉，. 基于三维激光扫描的锦屏地下实验室岩体变形破坏特征关键信息提取技术研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 488-495.
[8]	魏纲，周杨侃. 随机介质理论预测近距离平行盾构引起的地表沉降[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 113-119.
[9]	庄海洋，张艳书，薛栩超，徐烨,. 深软场地地铁狭长深基坑变形特征实测与已有统计结果的对比分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 561-570.
[10]	沈建文，刘力,. 盾构隧道施工对临近桥桩影响数值及现场监测研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 709-714.
[11]	沙鹏，伍法权，李响，梁宁，常金源，. 高地应力条件下层状地层隧道围岩挤压变形与支护受力特征[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1407-1414.
[12]	李雪，周顺华，宫全美，陈长江, . 大断面深埋高水压地铁盾构隧道周边土压力作用模式评价[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1415-1420.
[13]	蔡海兵，彭立敏，郑腾龙,. 隧道水平冻结壁强制解冻期地表沉降的预测方法[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3516-3522.
[14]	徐鹏飞，李耀良，徐伟，. 压入式沉井施工对环境影响的现场监测研究[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1084-1094.
[15]	蔡海兵，彭立敏，郑腾龙,. 隧道水平冻结施工期地表融沉的历时预测模型[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 504-510.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

隧道开挖地表沉降动态预测及影响因素分析

Dynamic prediction and influence factors analysis of ground surface settlement during tunnel excavation

PDF (Chinese)

PDF (English)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10