岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1341-1352.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1477

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

缓倾角塔柱状危岩压裂损伤-突变失稳预测

周福川,唐红梅,王林峰   

  1. 重庆交通大学 岩土工程研究所,重庆 400074
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-22 修回日期:2022-01-12 出版日期:2022-05-11 发布日期:2022-05-02
  • 通讯作者: 唐红梅,女,1968年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事岩土地质灾害减灾理论与防治技术研究。E-mail:hmtang6778@sina.com E-mail:981480645@qq.com
  • 作者简介:周福川,男,1989,博士研究生,工程师,主要从事岩土工程防灾减灾研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51678097,No. 5137821)

Catastrophe prediction of compression-induced fracturing and failure for a tower-shaped unstable rock mass with gentle dip angle

ZHOU Fu-chuan, TANG Hong-mei, WANG Lin-feng   

  1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
  • Received:2021-09-22 Revised:2022-01-12 Online:2022-05-11 Published:2022-05-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51678097,5137821).

摘要: 陡高边坡灰岩地区缓倾角塔柱状危岩常具有底部压裂诱发整体失稳破坏模式,其损伤-突变失稳机制属于山地灾害关键科学问题之一。以重庆南川区甑子岩W12#危岩崩塌为例,建立了荷载、水致弱化效应耦合下的损伤突变地质力学模型,获得了基于应变等价原理的损伤本构方程及总损伤度演化方程,并将水致弱化函数改进为软化系数的一元三次函数。将地质力学模型概化为等效弹簧模型,通过能量平衡原理建立损伤-折叠突变模型,获得了塔柱状危岩系统压裂失稳判据及临界突变位移特征值表达式。计算表明:W12#危岩压裂失稳时,该系统的控制变量为–0.003 251,小于0,表示该系统进入不稳定状态;计算理论突变位移起始值148.70 mm比实测位移第一拐点值154.34 mm偏小,相对误差约3.65%,偏于安全;理论损伤本构曲线、理论损伤演化曲线与现有文献数值模拟结果趋于一致,所构建的理论预测模型具有较好的适用性。其研究成果可用于预判塔柱状危岩压裂失稳损伤演化过程及突发失稳特征位移值,为灰岩区陡高边坡危岩崩塌监测预警和防灾减灾提供理论依据。

关键词: 塔柱状危岩, 压裂失稳, 损伤力学, 能量守恒, 折叠突变模型

Abstract: The overall failure mode of a tower-shaped unstable rock mass associated with bottom compression-induced fracturing frequently occurs on the steep-high slope with a gentle dip angle in the karst regions, and its damage-catastrophe mechanism belongs to a key issue in the mountainous disaster discipline. Taking a collapse case of Zengziyan unstable rock mass #W12 in Nanchuan District of Chongqing, China, for example, a damage-catastrophe geomechanical model considering the load and the water-weakening effect was built. A damage constitutive equation and a total damage degree evolution equation were derived based on the strain equivalence principle, and the water-weakening function was developed into a cubic function in one unknown for the softening coefficient. Then, the geomechanical model was simplified into an equivalent spring model and the damage-fold catastrophe model was established by the energy balance theory. Finally, the failure criterion and eigenvalue expression of critical displacement mutation for the tower-shaped unstable rock mass were obtained. The results show that when the unstable rock mass #W12 fails, the control variant determining the stability of a fold catastrophe model is –0.003 251, which is less than zero, demonstrating that the system turns into an unstable state. The initial calculated value of the theoretical displacement mutation of 148.70 mm is smaller than the first inflection point of the measured value of 154.34 mm, and the relative error is about 3.65% which tends to be safer. The theoretical damage constitutive curve and evolution curve are consistent with the numerical results obtained in the literature, suggesting that the theoretical model has a good applicability. The research outcome can be applied to predicting the damage evolution process and the eigenvalue of critical displacement mutation for the compression-induced fracturing and failure of a tower-shaped unstable rock mass. It also provides a theoretical basis for monitoring and early-warning of the steep-high unstable rock mass collapse and disaster prevention and mitigation in limestone area.

Key words: tower-shaped unstable rock mass, compression-induced fracturing and failure, damage mechanics, energy conservation, fold catastrophe model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457,P 642.21
[1] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, . 陇东Q3结构性黄土压剪损伤本构模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3855-3870.
[2] 易庆林,赵能浩,刘艺梁, . 基于能量守恒的滑坡稳定性计算模型[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 1-10.
[3] 晁明颂,高 盟,张继严,陈青生,. 基于能量耗散的球孔扩张理论解答[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 1986-1993.
[4] 陈俊桦 ,张家生,李新平,. 基于岩石爆破损伤理论的预裂爆破参数研究及应用[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1441-1450.
[5] 刘俊伟 ,俞 峰 ,张忠苗 ,王 宁. 基于能量守恒的预制桩施工残余应力模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1227-1232.
[6] 邱 康,陈 勉,金 衍. 基于统计损伤的井壁坍塌压力模型[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2029-2033.
[7] 王素玲 ,姜民政 ,刘 合. 基于损伤力学分析的水力压裂三维裂缝形态研究[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2205-2210.
[8] 贾善坡 陈卫忠 于洪丹 李香玲. 泥岩渗流-应力耦合蠕变损伤模型研究(Ⅱ): 数值仿真和参数反演[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3163-3170.
[9] 田启强,侯兴民,王自法. 基于块体基础自由振动计算地基阻尼比的新方法[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 211-216.
[10] 阳恩慧,邱延峻,向可明. 山区公路典型沥青路面结构容许横向沉降差研究[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3329-3336.
[11] 张我华,薛新华. 孔隙介质的渗透特性初探[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1357-1361.
[12] 倪骁慧,朱珍德,赵 杰,李道伟,冯夏庭. 岩石破裂全程数字化细观损伤力学试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3283-3290.
[13] 姜小春 ,谢和平 ,周宏伟 . 压缩载荷下准脆性材料宏细观损伤变量研究[J]. , 2008, 29(9): 2531-2536.
[14] 赵志刚 ,谭云亮 ,程国强 . 煤巷掘进迎头煤与瓦斯突出的突变机制分析[J]. , 2008, 29(6): 1644-1648.
[15] 周尚志 ,党发宁 ,陈厚群 ,龙巧玲 . 岩石类材料疲劳破坏裂纹扩展分析的数值方法[J]. , 2008, 29(3): 769-774.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .