岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 392-400.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1861

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

西昌太和矿北采场滑坡变形演化规律 及成因机制研究

朱涛1, 2,尹翔3,王成汤1,闵弘1,王浩1,陈娱4,何俊霖4   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中南安全环境技术研究院股份有限公司,湖北 武汉 430071;4. 四川二八二核地质工程有限公司,四川 德阳 618000
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-04 修回日期:2022-02-16 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-09
  • 通讯作者: 王浩,男,1972年生,博士,研究员,主要从事岩土工程监测、数据建模、风险分析和相关软件开发等方面的研究。E-mail: hwang@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail: zhutao19@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:朱涛,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程地质灾害防治、安全监测等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2017YFC1501304)

Deformation evolution law and formation mechanism of landslide in north stope of Taihe mine, Xichang

ZHU Tao1, 2, YIN Xiang3, WANG Cheng-tang1, MIN Hong1, WANG Hao1, CHEN Yu4, HE Jun-lin4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Central Southern Safety and Environment Technology Institute Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 4. Sichuan 282 Nuclear Geological Engineering Co., Ltd., Deyang, Sichuan 618000, China
  • Received:2021-11-04 Revised:2022-02-16 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2017YFC1501304).

摘要: 以四川省西昌市的太和矿北采场边坡为研究对象,结合了现场地质调查与测绘、原位试验、室内试验以及数值模拟等多种研究方法,详细分析了滑坡的变形演化特征、成因机制以及降雨入渗条件下边坡的稳定性。研究表明:(1)2018年和2019年两次滑坡均发生在雨季,且随着雨季结束而再次稳定。(2)该滑坡的形成是多因素综合作用的结果,断层为滑坡形成提供了边界,是外在条件;辉绿岩绿泥石、蒙脱石含量高,遇水易软化崩解,是内在条件;矿山开采与降雨是诱发因素,开采形成超高边坡,并揭露了辉绿岩层,而雨水从坡表及断层入渗,对整个辉绿岩层侵蚀软化,在高势能作用下发生局部滑移,继而牵引至整体滑动。(3)降雨对边坡安全系数及破坏模式均产生较大影响,降雨前边坡稳定,潜在破坏模式为整体滑动;降雨5 d后边坡安全系数下降至0.842,在辉绿岩层发生两个台阶局部滑动;之后边坡安全系数继续降低,破坏范围进一步扩大,与实际情况相互印证。

关键词: 矿山边坡, 辉绿岩, 变形演化规律, 成因机制, 非饱和渗流

Abstract: This study aims at revealing the deformation and evolution characteristics, formation mechanism and stability of slope under rainfall infiltration condition. A slope in the north stope of Taihe mine in Xichang city, Sichuan province was analyzed in detail as a research object by adopting various methods such as field geological survey and mapping, in-situ test, laboratory test and numerical simulation. The results show that: 1) Both landslides in 2018 and 2019 occurred in rainy season and stabilized again with the end of rainy season. 2) The formation of the landslide is the result of the comprehensive action of multiple factors: the fault provides the boundary for the formation of the landslide, which is the external condition; the diabase with high content of chlorite and montmorillonite is easy to soften and disintegrate when exposed to water, which is an internal condition; the mining and rainfall are the inducing factors. Mining forms an ultra-high slope and exposes the diabase rock layer, while rainwater infiltrates from the slope surface and fault to erode and soften the whole diabase rock layer, resulting in local sliding of the diabase layer under the action of high potential energy, and then pulling it to the overall sliding. 3) Rainfall greatly impacts on the factor of safety and failure mode of slope. The slope is in a stable state before rainfall, and the potential failure mode is overall sliding. After 5 days of rainfall, the factor of safety for the slope drops to 0.842, and two steps of local sliding occurs in the diabase layer. After that, the factor of safety continues to decrease, and the damage range further expands, which is confirmed by the actual observations.

Key words: mine slope, diabase, deformation evolution law, formation mechanism, unsaturated seepage

中图分类号: 

  • TD74
[1] 侯晓萍, 樊恒辉. 基于COMSOL Multiphysics的非饱和 裂隙土降雨入渗特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 563-572.
[2] 薛松, 杨志兵, 李东奇, 陈益峰. 滴状流条件下非饱和交叉裂隙分流机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 59-67.
[3] 金爱兵, 陈帅军, 赵安宇, 孙浩, 张玉帅, . 基于无人机摄影测量的露天矿边坡数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 255-264.
[4] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[5] 谢 强, 田大浪, 刘金辉, 张建华, 张志斌, . 土质边坡的饱和−非饱和渗流分析及特殊应力修正[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 879-892.
[6] 张晨阳,张 明,张泰丽,孙 强,杨 龙,. 侵入岩脉风化壳对中林村残积土滑坡渗流场和稳定性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2617-2625.
[7] 郑俊杰,郭震山,崔 岚,张 军,. 考虑非饱和渗流与增湿膨胀下的膨胀土隧道稳定性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3271-3277.
[8] 蒋泽锋 ,朱大勇,. 强降雨条件下具有张裂缝边坡临界滑动场[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 25-34.
[9] 杜国梁,张永双,姚 鑫,郭长宝,杨志华|. 都江堰市五里坡高位滑坡-碎屑流成因机制分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 493-501.
[10] 李文涛,马田田,韦昌富. 基于自适应松弛Picard法的高效非饱和渗流有限元分析[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 256-262.
[11] 丁金华 ,陈仁朋 ,童 军 ,龚壁卫,. 基于多场耦合数值分析的膨胀土边坡浅层膨胀变形破坏机制研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 159-168.
[12] 吴志伟 ,宋汉周,. 基于流-热耦合模型的土石坝渗流热监测研究[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 584-590.
[13] 蒋水华 ,李典庆 ,周创兵 ,张利民,. 考虑参数空间变异性的非饱和土坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2569-2578.
[14] 蒋中明 ,熊小虎 ,曾 铃,. 基于FLAC3D平台的边坡非饱和降雨入渗分析[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 855-861.
[15] 陆定杰 ,陈善雄 ,罗红明 ,戴张俊 ,李扬帆 ,陈 平,. 南阳膨胀土渠道滑坡破坏特征与演化机制研究[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 189-196.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .