岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 2525-2538.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1878

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于自组织临界理论的岩石声发射能量 与时间的统计分析

孙冰1,唐文福1,曾晟2,侯珊珊3,方耀楚1   

  1. 1. 南华大学 土木工程学院,湖南 衡阳 421001;2. 南华大学 资源环境与安全工程学院,湖南 衡阳 421001; 3. 中国矿业大学 深部岩石力学与地下工程国家重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221000
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-08 修回日期:2022-05-07 出版日期:2022-09-12 发布日期:2022-09-12
  • 通讯作者: 曾晟,男,1977年生,博士,教授,主要从事采矿与岩土工程灾害和防治方面科研工作。E-mail: usczengs@126.com E-mail: sunbingnh@126.com
  • 作者简介:孙冰,女,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩石力学与防灾减灾方面研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(No.2021JJ30575);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51204098)

Statistical analysis of rock acoustic emission energy and waiting time based on self-organized criticality theory

SUN Bing1, TANG Wen-fu1, ZENG Sheng2, HOU Shan-shan3, FANG Yao-chu1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China; 2. School of Resources, Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Deep Rock Mechanics and Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221000, Chian
  • Received:2021-11-08 Revised:2022-05-07 Online:2022-09-12 Published:2022-09-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2021JJ30575) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51204098).

摘要: 自组织临界理论为无序和非线性复杂系统的行为特征和演化模式提供了新的解释,基于该理论探讨岩石破裂演化的规律。考虑到体型对其破坏特征的影响,制作了立方体和圆柱体两种体型岩石试件,开展单轴压缩和声发射试验,分析岩石破裂演化过程中自组织临界点前后的声发射信息,根据声发射能量概率密度、声发射空间定位及等候时间的分布,对临界指数 κ、余震分布指数 α 和等候时间分布指数 δ 等参数进行统计。结果表明:不论是立方体还是圆柱体试样,其破坏过程均是一个由低能值的无序稳定态向高能值的有序非稳定态发展的自组织过程,体型对其破坏的自组织过程影响较小,立方体试件相对圆柱体试件,前者从受压到自组织第一临界点(体积膨胀起始点)的持续时间相对较久,且由第一到第二临界点(峰值强度点)的自组织演化过程更迅速,其破坏更具规律性,破坏预测优于后者;立方体试件在受压过程中趋于多向应力状态,对岩石内部裂缝的发展具有一定的限制作用,破裂全过程的临界指数较大,圆柱体试件的局部屈服弱化特征较明显,在受压作用下更容易导致裂隙的发展,破裂全过程的临界指数较小;对于岩石的Omori定律分布统计指数 α,立方体试件破裂自组织演化过程中第二阶段声发射余震分布的 α 值大于1,而圆柱体试件的 α 值小于1,表明立方体试件在第二临界点出现前已进入了临界失稳状态;在大的等候时间差范围内(>0.1 s),试件破裂自组织演化过程第二阶段的临界指数相对第一阶段较大,意味着新裂纹出现的频率随着破裂的自组织演化而加剧,声发射能量的临界特征可以较好反映岩石破裂过程中的内部响应。

关键词: 岩石破裂过程, 自组织临界性, 声发射能量, 幂律分布, 临界指数

Abstract: Self-organizing criticality theory provides a new interpretation for the behaviour characteristics and evolution patterns of disordered and non-linear complex systems. Based on this theory, the law of fracture evolution with different rock types was discussed. Considering the influence of body shape on the failure characteristics, uniaxial compression test and acoustic emission (AE) test were carried out on two rock specimens, i.e. cube and cylinder. The acoustic emission information before and after the self-organized critical point during the evolution of rock fracture was analyzed. According to the distributed of the probability density of AE energy, the spatial positioning of AE event and the AE waiting time, and their critical exponent k, productivity exponent α  of after shock distribution, and waiting time distribution exponent δ were analyzed statistically. The results show that the failure processes of both cube and cylinder specimens are self-organization processes from disordered stable state of low energy value to ordered unstable state of high energy value. The body shape has little effect on the self-organization process of its destruction. Comparing with cylindrical specimens, the first phase of cubic specimens from compression to the first critical point of self-organization, volume expansion point, lasts relatively longer, and the self-organization evolution process from the first critical point to the second critical point of self-organization, speak strength point, is also faster. The failure of the cubic specimen is more regular, which is more conducive to failure prediction. Cubic specimen is isotropic in the process of compression, which restricts the development of cracks so the critical index of the whole process of fracture is larger. While the local yield weakening characteristic of cylindrical specimen is obvious, which makes the development of cracks under compression easier and its critical index is smaller. For the productivity exponent α of Omori law of rocks with different sizes, the value α of the second stage of the self-organization evolution of fracture of cubic specimens is greater than 1, while that of cylinderical specimens is less than 1, indicating that the cube specimens have entered the critical instability state before the second critical point. In the large waiting time range (>0.1 s), the critical exponent of the second stage of self-organization evolution of fracture of specimens with different body shapes is larger than that of the first stage, which is consistent with the fact that the frequency of new cracks increases with the self-organization evolution of fracture.

Key words: rock fracture process, self-organizing criticality, acoustic emission energy, power law distribution, critical index

中图分类号: 

  • TU452
[1] 周 磊,朱哲明,刘 邦. 裂纹对直墙拱形隧道围岩损伤破坏模式的影响规律研究[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3688-3697.
[2] 李天斌,陈子全,陈国庆,马春驰,唐欧玲,王敏杰. 不同含水率作用下砂岩的能量机制研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 229-236.
[3] 郭海强 ,姚令侃 ,黄艺丹 ,郭沉稳,. 扰动强度递增斜坡动力学演变规律的振动台试验[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1063-1070.
[4] 陈子全,李天斌,陈国庆,张 航. 水力耦合作用下的砂岩声发射特性试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2815-2822.
[5] 徐奴文 ,唐春安 ,唐世斌 ,张永彬 ,沙 椿 . 考虑弱层置换的岩石边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 495-0500.
[6] 周翠英,朱凤贤,张 磊. 软岩饱水试验与软化临界现象研究[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1709-1715.
[7] 潘鹏志,冯夏庭,周 辉. 脆性岩石破裂演化过程的三维细胞自动机模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1471-1476.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .