岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1779-1788.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1073

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同水力荷载路径下煤体微观渗流特征及宏观破坏研究

马国良,陈曦,范超男,葛少成   

  1. 太原理工大学 安全与应急管理工程学院,山西 太原 030024
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-10 接受日期:2022-09-19 出版日期:2023-06-14 发布日期:2023-06-17
  • 通讯作者: 范超男,女,1987年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩石力学与工程、智能通风与除尘等相关教学和研究。E-mail: fanchaonan@tyut.edu.cn E-mail:maguoliang1286@link.tyut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:马国良,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事煤层注水润湿与增透和智能通风与粉尘防治方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52174195,No.51704145);山西省基础研究计划(自由探索类)(No.20210302123122,No.20210302123103)。

Micro seepage characteristics and macro failure of coal under different hydraulic loading paths

MA Guo-liang, CHEN Xi, FAN Chao-nan, GE Shao-cheng   

  1. College of Safety and Emergency Management Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China
  • Received:2022-07-10 Accepted:2022-09-19 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52174195, 51704145) and the Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province (20210302123122, 20210302123103).

摘要: 为探究煤体在不同水力荷载路径下的微观渗流特征,通过CT三维重建技术,建立了基于煤体微观结构的双介质渗流模型,并设计了恒定速度加载(LP1)、常规脉动加载(LP2)和强加载缓卸载加载(LP3)3种水力荷载路径,进行了在不同循环荷载路径下的煤体注水渗流数值模拟试验。另外利用自行搭建的煤体注水装置,探究了3种荷载路径下的宏观损伤情况。结果表明:联通裂隙占孔裂隙结构的73.49%,是影响煤体渗流的主要因素,而孔径为9~23 μm的孔隙是孤立孔隙中的主要部分,数量和体积占比均超过了50%;煤体内部孔裂隙结构和荷载路径对渗流速度和压力的分布特征具有重要影响。LP1沿注入方向平均渗流速度的波动较大,LP3则抑制效果明显,且LP3路径较LP1和LP2随时间有较大跨度。LP3的荷载路径相对于LP1具有脉动荷载的疲劳损伤效果,并且造成的损伤程度强于LP2。该研究可为煤体微观结构研究和煤层注水技术参数优化提供方向。

关键词: CT三维重建, 渗流特征, 煤层注水, 孔裂隙结构, 强加载缓卸载

Abstract: To study the micro seepage characteristics of coal under different hydraulic load paths, a two-media seepage model based on the microstructure of coal is established through CT three-dimensional reconstruction technology. Three equivalent hydraulic loading paths are designed, i.e., constant velocity loading (LP1), conventional pulsating loading (LP2), and fast-loading and slow-unloading loading (LP3). The numerical simulation tests of water injection seepage of coal under different cyclic load paths are carried out. In addition, the self-built water injection device of coal is used to explore the macro damage under three loading paths. The results show that the connected fractures account for 73.49% of the pore-fracture structure and are the main factor influencing coal seepage. The pores with a diameter of 9−23 μm are the major part of the isolated pores, with the number and volume share exceeding 50%. The pore-fracture structure and loading path within the coal has an important influence on the seepage distribution characteristics of velocities and pressures. The average seepage velocity of LP1 fluctuates greatly along the intrusion direction, while the inhibition effect of LP3 is obvious, and the path of LP3 has a larger span over time than those of LP1 and LP2. Compared with LP1, the loading path of LP3 has the fatigue damage effect of pulsating load, and the damage degree is more severe than that of LP2. This research can provide directions for the study of coal microstructure and the optimization of technical parameters of coal seam water intrusion.

Key words: CT 3D reconstruction, seepage characteristics, coal seam water injection, pore and fracture structure, fast-loading and slow-unloading

中图分类号: 

  • TD714
[1] 王刚, 冯净, 陈雪畅, 闫松, 李胜鹏, . 基于物化特性的煤层注水难易程度模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 144-154.
[2] 毛彦军, 陈曦, 范超男, 葛少成, 李文璞, . 基于CT三维重建的注水煤岩体裂隙扩展规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1717-1726.
[3] 王彦东, 梁靖, 裴向军, . 九寨沟震后核心景区崩滑堆积体冲刷启动机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1048-1060.
[4] 杨赫, 程卫民, 刘震, 王文玉, 赵大伟, 王文迪. 注水煤体有效渗流通道结构分形特征 核磁共振试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1279-1286.
[5] 吴祖松 ,梁 波 ,王元清 ,徐林生 ,刘新荣 ,王 羽,. 水下圆形隧道注浆加固区渗流特征理论研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 89-94.
[6] 刘先珊 ,林耀生 ,孔 建,. 考虑卸荷作用的裂隙岩体渗流应力耦合研究[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 192-196.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .