岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 2754-2764.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0367

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄土塬边漫灌区土体水入渗过程研究

赵宽耀1,许强2,陈婉琳2,彭大雷2,高登辉1   

  1. 1. 黄淮学院 河南省结构力学与数值仿真国际联合实验室,河南 驻马店 463000; 2. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-27 接受日期:2024-05-27 出版日期:2024-09-06 发布日期:2024-09-03
  • 通讯作者: 许强,男,1968年生,博士,教授,主要从事滑坡灾害机理及预测预报方面的研究。E-mail: xq@cdut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:赵宽耀,男,1991年生,博士,讲师,主要从事黄土滑坡形成机制及防控方面的研究。E-mail: ky.zhao@huanghuai.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.42207200,No.42307235)。

Infiltration process of loess in flood irrigation area

ZHAO Kuan-yao1, XU Qiang2, CHEN Wan-lin2, PENG Da-lei2, GAO Deng-hui1   

  1. 1. Henan International Joint Laboratory of Structural Mechanics and Computational Simulation, Huanghuai University, Zhumadian, Henan 463000, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2024-03-27 Accepted:2024-05-27 Online:2024-09-06 Published:2024-09-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42207200, 42307235).

摘要: 黄土漫灌区水入渗形成的饱和黄土层内极易产生液化型破坏,诸如积石山6.2级地震诱发的中川乡液化型黄土滑坡和甘肃黑方台黄土滑坡为典型案例;然而,黄土中水的渗流是以活塞式基质渗流为主还是以优势渗流为主,目前尚未定论。以甘肃黑方台典型滑坡后缘漫灌区土体为研究对象,开展现场漫灌入渗试验,借助三维高密度电法实时监测水的入渗过程;利用电阻率变化率表征水分的整体入渗过程,并用相邻测量时段电阻率变化率差值表征该时段内水分的关键渗流空间,分析漫灌作用下黄土中水的渗流模式,探讨不同补给强度对渗流模式的影响。主要得出以下结论:(1)固定电极的时序三维高密度电法能有效探测黄土中水的渗流过程;(2)试验区黄土中呈现基质流与优势流共存的渗流模式,其中基质流的均匀入渗为测量空间内的主要渗流模式且集中于近地表2 m内,优势流表现为延伸至4 m深度的优势通道内水分向周围以基质流形式逐渐渗流,渗流轨迹受优势通道分布的影响;(3)含裂隙黄土中水的渗流模式受水补给强度的影响,其中漫灌或降雨积水时,出露地表的裂隙内水分可直接下渗至裂隙延伸的区域形成优势流,而在无积水的降雨条件下,裂隙内无法形成明显优势流,水分以活塞式基质流的形式下渗。研究成果可为黄土中水渗流的现场观测及模式探讨提供借鉴。

关键词: 黑方台, 黄土滑坡, 原位入渗试验, 优势流, 高密度电法

Abstract: The saturated loess layer is susceptible to liquefaction failure, as evidenced by the liquefaction loess landslide in Zhongchuan triggered by the Jishishan M6.2 earthquake, and the Heifangtai loess landslides serve as typical examples. Nonetheless, the infiltration mechanism in loess remains elusive. A field irrigation test was carried out at the rear boundary of a representative landslide in Heifangtai, with the water infiltration process monitored using the 3D electrical resistivity tomography method. The cumulative rate of resistivity change was employed to depict the overall infiltration process, while the disparity in resistivity change rates between adjacent measurement intervals was utilized to identify the primary seepage pathways. The infiltration mechanism in loess was examined under varying recharge intensities. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) The time-series 3D electrical resistivity tomography method can effectively detect the infiltration process in loess. (2) There co-exists matrix flow and preferential flow in the test, the matrix flow is the main infiltration mode during the test. The preferential flow shows the gradual seepage around the preferential channel extending to a depth of 4 m, and the seepage area is affected by the distribution of preferential channel. (3) The infiltration mode in the fissured loess is affected by the intensity of water recharge. With the flood irrigation or rainfall water ponding, the water in the fissures can directly penetrate into the deep soil forming a preferential flow. While in case of rainfall without water ponding, there is no obvious preferential flow observed, and the water infiltrate only with matrix flow. The results can provide reference for the study of field infiltration test and infiltration mechanism in loess.

Key words: Heifangtai, loess landslide, field infiltration test, preferential flow, electrical resistivity tomography

中图分类号: 

  • TU434
[1] 豆红强, 谢森华, 简文彬, 王浩, 郭朝旭, . 球状风化花岗岩类土质边坡土-岩界面优势流潜蚀特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 950-960.
[2] 赵宽耀, 许强, 高登辉, 刘方洲, 彭大雷, 陈婉琳, . 坡底饱和型黄土滑坡离心模拟试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3213-3223.
[3] 黄晓虎, 易武, 黄海峰, 邓永煌. 优势流入渗与坡体变形关系研究及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1396-1403.
[4] 闫亚景, 闫永帅, 赵贵章, 张泰丽, 孙强, . 基于高密度电法的天然边坡水分运移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2807-2814.
[5] 曹春山 ,吴树仁 ,潘 懋,梁昌玉,. 工程切坡诱发黄土滑坡成因机制研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1049-1060.
[6] 梁 越,王俊杰,刘明维 , . 基于流网单元的污染物优势运移数值模型[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 3007-3014.
[7] 张晓超 ,黄润秋 ,许 模 ,裴向军 ,韩祥森 ,宋丽娟 ,张帆宇,. 石碑塬滑坡黄土液化特征及其影响因素研究[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 801-810.
[8] 谷天峰 ,王家鼎 ,王念秦 . 吕梁机场黄土滑坡特征及其三维稳定性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(7): 2009-2016.
[9] 姚海林 ,游慧杰 ,范永丰 ,刘 军 ,李正强 . 柳家凹黄土滑坡滑动机制研究[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 182-188.
[10] 张常亮,王阿丹,邢鲜丽,王昌业,李同录,李 萍. 侵蚀作用诱发黄土滑坡的机制研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1585-1592.
[11] 武彩霞 ,许 领 ,戴福初 ,闵 弘 , 谭国焕 ,邝国麟 ,周跃峰. 黑方台黄土泥流滑坡及发生机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1767-1773.
[12] 刘艳章,王水林,葛修润,周 平. 高密度电法在三峡库区滑坡勘察中的应用[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 519-523.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!