岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1686-1698.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0826

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于界面本构模型的砂土中单桩荷载−沉降响应预测方法

周攀1, 2,李镜培1, 2,李盼盼1, 2,刘耕云1, 2,张超哲3   

  1. 1. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092; 3. 东南大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 211189
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-17 接受日期:2023-08-10 出版日期:2024-06-19 发布日期:2024-06-19
  • 通讯作者: 李镜培,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学及桩基础工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: lijp2773@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:周攀,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土力学及桩基础工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: zhoupan0201@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42272310)。

Prediction method for load-settlement response of a single pile in sand based on an interface constitutive model

ZHOU Pan1, 2, LI Jing-pei1, 2, LI Pan-pan1, 2, LIU Geng-yun1, 2, ZHANG Chao-zhe3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China
  • Received:2023-06-17 Accepted:2023-08-10 Online:2024-06-19 Published:2024-06-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42272310).

摘要: 基于界面本构模型提出了一种新的砂土中单桩荷载沉降响应的预测方法。首先,从土−结构界面本构模型出发推导了严格的桩−土界面非线性荷载传递模型,该模型承继了界面本构模型特征,能够模拟桩−土界面上发生的应变硬化/软化、剪胀与应力路径依赖性等行为。此外,采用双曲线荷载传递模型模拟桩端−土相互作用的非线性应力−位移关系。上述荷载传递模型所需参数可以通过室内界面剪切试验和土工试验进行校准。继而,基于荷载传递法,提出了单桩荷载沉降响应分析的一维计算模型,并采用迭代算法进行数值求解。最后,将理论解答与已报道的模型试验、自主开展的模型桩试验以及数值模拟结果进行比较,以验证所提出的理论方法的正确性。试验结果表明,预测值与实测值吻合较好,且该方法能够很好地预测非位移桩与位移桩的荷载沉降响应。提出了一个基于界面本构模型的单桩荷载沉降响应分析框架,为竖向荷载下砂土中单桩优化设计提供了理论参考。

关键词: 单桩, 砂土, 荷载-沉降响应, 桩-土相互作用, 界面本构模型, 模型试验

Abstract: A novel method for predicting the load-settlement response of a single pile in sands is developed based on an interface constitutive model. Firstly, a rigorous nonlinear load-transfer model for the pile-soil interface is derived from the soil-structure interface constitutive model. This model incorporates the beneficial features of the adopted interface constitutive model and effectively simulates fundamental interface characteristics, such as strain hardening (or softening), normal shear dilation, and stress path dependency occurring at the pile-soil interface. Additionally, a hyperbolic load-transfer model is employed to simulate the nonlinear stress-displacement relationship between the pile end and soil. The parameters for the aforementioned load-transfer model can be calibrated through experimental interface shear tests and geotechnical experiments. Subsequently, a one-dimensional computational model for analyzing the load-settlement response of a single pile is proposed based on the load transfer method, with numerical solutions obtained using an iterative algorithm. Finally, the theoretical results are compared with reported and independently conducted model pile tests to validate the accuracy of the proposed theoretical approach. The experimental results show a good agreement between the predicted and measured values, demonstrating the method’s excellent capability in predicting the load-settlement response of both displacement and non-displacement piles. This paper presents an analytical framework based on the interface constitutive model for analyzing the load-settlement response of single piles, providing a theoretical reference for optimizing the design of pile foundations in sandy soils under vertical loads.

Key words: pile foundation, sand, load-settlement response, pile-soil interaction, interface constitutive model, model test

中图分类号: 

  • TU473.1
[1] 雷华阳, 杨洋, 许英刚. 不同埋深条件下盾构施工扰动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
[2] 刘志春, 马博, 胡指南, 张振波, 杜孔泽, . 邻近地下结构基坑主动土压力分布规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 33-41.
[3] 孙旻洋, 王忠瑾, 谢新宇, 张日红, 娄扬, 朱大勇, . 饱和黏土中能源群桩热力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 382-390.
[4] 吴九江, 肖琳, 王丽娟, 张祎, . 基于粒子图像测速技术的节状地下连续墙变形特性与破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2707-2718.
[5] 许文昊, 王志华, 申志福, 高洪梅, 刘殷强, 张鑫磊, . 基于CFD-DEM方法的饱和砂土场地液化模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2492-2501.
[6] 马登辉, 韩迅, 蔡正银, 关云飞, . 静压桩的桩侧土压力分布规律数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1863-1872.
[7] 冷伍明, 丁荣锋, 杨奇, 陈琛, 邓煜晨, 徐方, 阮波, . 粗糙度对单桩竖向承载变形特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1597-1607.
[8] 胡伟, 李砥柱, 林志, 冯世进, 黄勇祥, . 双锚片螺旋锚倾斜拉拔承载特性与承载力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1661-1674.
[9] 肖明清, 徐晨, 崔岚, 盛谦, 陈健, 谢壁婷, 晏庆明. 基于总安全系数法的系统锚杆支护承载能力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1743-1754.
[10] THUY Do Van, TIEP Pham Duc, HIEU Nguyen Van, THANG Pham Cao. 循环三轴试验加载频率和压实度对重塑砂土液化行为的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1813-1823.
[11] 李金宇, 王伟, 王浩宇, 杨研科, 徐凯放, 张晓庆, 熊文. 地震序列作用下液化场地条件影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1551-1559.
[12] 喻文昭, 朱鸿鹄, 王德洋, 谢天铖, 裴华富, 施斌, . 荷载作用下砂土边坡-管道相互作用试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1309-1320.
[13] 刘秀敏, 范凯, 王月, 王文中, 陈从新, . 陡倾结构金属矿山岩移规律的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1412-1422.
[14] 陈磊, 张强, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 黄娟, 胡晶, . 强降雨对库岸堆积体边坡稳定性影响的离心模型试验和数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1423-1434.
[15] 熊根, 付栋康, 朱斌, 赖莹, . 软黏土中吸力锚承载特性离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1472-1480.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!