岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1863-1872.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1157

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

静压桩的桩侧土压力分布规律数值分析

马登辉1, 2,韩迅1,蔡正银1,关云飞1   

  1. 1. 南京水利科学研究院 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210024;2. 河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京 210024
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-31 接受日期:2023-08-30 出版日期:2024-06-19 发布日期:2024-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 韩迅,男,1991年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事海洋岩土方面的科学研究。E-mail: xhan@nhri.cn
  • 作者简介:马登辉,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事海洋岩土方面的科学研究。E-mail: madenghui@hhu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2021YFB2600700);国家自然科学基金(No.52271286)。

Numerical analysis of soil pressure distribution law on pile shaft of displacement pile

MA Deng-hui1, 2, HAN Xun1, CAI Zheng-yin1, GUAN Yun-fei1   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 2. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China
  • Received:2023-07-31 Accepted:2023-08-30 Online:2024-06-19 Published:2024-06-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFB2600700) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52271286).

摘要: 静压桩的贯入挤土效应导致桩侧土压力升高,探究桩贯入挤土导致的桩侧土压力变化对建立合理的桩贯入阻力计算方法具有积极的意义。因此,采用大变形数值模拟方法和南水本构模型对桩在砂土中的贯入过程进行了分析,探究了桩侧土压力系数K的变化规律。结果表明:桩贯入过程中土体受力可划分为加载、卸载和应力稳定3个阶段,在桩端到达土体所在深度时土体的应力达到峰值,远离后土体发生应力卸载,最后趋于稳定;在深度方向的最大扰动范围为5D(D为桩直径),沿径向最大扰动范围为6D。桩贯入完成后的桩侧土压力沿深度方向近似表现为线性分布,在桩端处出现极值。桩径的变化对土压力的影响不显著,不同直径的桩侧壁土压力接近。随着界面摩擦系数的增加,桩侧土压力逐渐增大。基于数值分析结果提出了考虑桩−土界面摩擦系数的桩侧土压力计算方法。

关键词: 砂土, 挤土效应, 土压力系数, 大变形数值模拟

Abstract: The soil compaction effect of pile penetration increases soil pressure on the pile shaft. Analyzing soil pressure changes caused by pile penetration is significance for establishing a calculation method for pile penetration resistance. The large deformation numerical simulation method and Nanshui soil model were used to analyze the pile penetration process in sandy soil. The variation of soil pressure coefficient K under different working conditions was analyzed. Numerical analysis results indicate that the change in soil horizontal stress during the pile penetration process can be divided into three stages: loading, unloading and stress stabilization. The soil horizontal stress peaks when the pile end reaches a certain depth, and then the soil enters the unloading stage as penetration continues, and finally stabilizes. The maximum disturbance range is 5D in the depth direction and 6D in the radial direction. Soil pressure on the pile shaft after penetration is approximately linear, with extreme values at the pile end. The change in pile diameter has an insignificant effect on soil pressure, and the soil pressure on the pile shaft with different diameters is similar. As the interface friction coefficient increases, the soil pressure on the pile shaft gradually rises. Based on the numerical analysis results, a method for calculating pile shaft soil pressure considering the pile-soil interface friction coefficient is proposed.

Key words: sand soil, soil compaction effect, soil pressure coefficient, large deformation numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • TU473
[1] 许文昊, 王志华, 申志福, 高洪梅, 刘殷强, 张鑫磊, . 基于CFD-DEM方法的饱和砂土场地液化模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2492-2501.
[2] THUY Do Van, TIEP Pham Duc, HIEU Nguyen Van, THANG Pham Cao. 循环三轴试验加载频率和压实度对重塑砂土液化行为的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1813-1823.
[3] 周攀, 李镜培, 李盼盼, 刘耕云, 张超哲, . 基于界面本构模型的砂土中单桩荷载−沉降响应预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1686-1698.
[4] 冷伍明, 丁荣锋, 杨奇, 陈琛, 邓煜晨, 徐方, 阮波, . 粗糙度对单桩竖向承载变形特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1597-1607.
[5] 李金宇, 王伟, 王浩宇, 杨研科, 徐凯放, 张晓庆, 熊文. 地震序列作用下液化场地条件影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1551-1559.
[6] 金丹丹, 鲁先东, 王炳辉, 施展, 张雷, . 冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1081-1091.
[7] 张希栋, 董晓强, 段伟, 谢明星, . 基于纤维加固砂土静力液化评估的超孔隙压力系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 714-724.
[8] 张希栋, 董晓强, 段伟, 胡顺磊, 张豪儒, . 不排水循环荷载下纤维加固砂土的超孔压及流动液化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 465-476.
[9] 蒋明镜, 张卢丰, 韩亮, 姜朋明, . 基于符号回归算法的结构性砂土损伤规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3768-3778.
[10] 吴琳, 吕亚茹, 张申, 丁思超. 砂土SHPB冲击试验与数值模拟研究进展及问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3461-3480.
[11] 王树英, 钟嘉政, 倪准林, 郑响凑, . 带压环境下泥浆-泡沫组合改良级配不良砂剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2879-2888.
[12] 王晓磊, 刘理腾, 刘润, 刘历波, 董林, 任海. 地震历史对各深度土体抗液化性影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2657-2666.
[13] 杨奇, 王晓雅, 聂如松, 陈琛, 陈缘正, 徐方, . 间歇循环荷载作用下饱和砂土累积塑性变形及孔压特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1671-1683.
[14] 高燕, 余骏远, 陈庆, 史天根, . 侧限条件下密实砂土蠕变的颗粒运动特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1385-1394.
[15] 江杰, 付臣志, 柴文成, 欧孝夺, . 砂土地基中桩顶竖向-水平加载路径下柔性单桩水平承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1375-1384.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!