优化与非优化复合锚固结构抗爆性能对比试验研究

›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (S2): 76-82.

优化与非优化复合锚固结构抗爆性能对比试验研究

赵林^{1, 2}，曾宪明³，李世民³，林大路³，陆卫国³

1. 湖南大学土木工程学院，长沙 410082；2. 河南科技大学建筑工程学院，河南洛阳 471004；3. 总参工程兵科研三所，河南洛阳 47102

收稿日期:2011-07-01 出版日期:2011-08-10 发布日期:2011-08-26
作者简介:赵林，男，1966年生，在读博士，高工，主要从事岩石力学试验研究方面的工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（No. 10772199）。

Comparative test study of blast-resistance performance of optimal composite anchorage structures and non-optimal composite anchorage structures

ZHAO Lin^{1, 2}, ZENG Xian-ming³, LI Shi-min³, LIN Da-lu³, LU Wei-guo³

1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University , Changsha 410082, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan 471004, China; 3. The Third Engineer Scientific Research Institute of the Headquarters of the General Staff, Luoyang, Henan 471023, China;

Received:2011-07-01 Online:2011-08-10 Published:2011-08-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 优化复合锚固结构与非优化复合锚固结构均由土钉和在土钉端部设置的一定长度的经特殊处理的空孔段群即弱化孔群组成，二者的惟一差异是弱化孔长度不同，前者是优化的，后者是据经验确定的。为比较二者的抗爆性能，进行了对比试验研究。试验结果表明，非优化复合锚固结构的拱顶动应变峰值是优化复合锚固结构的2.1倍以上，非优化复合锚固结构的质点加速度峰值是优化复合锚固结构的2倍（拱顶）～5倍（底板），并与宏观结果相吻合，优化复合锚固结构的临界破坏抗力是非优化者的2.1倍以上，极限破坏条件下，拱顶下凸大变形尺度和面层脱落范围，优化复合锚固结构仅为非优化复合锚固结构的25%和33%。

关键词: 优化复合锚固结构, 非优化复合锚固结构, 抗爆性能, 对比研究

Abstract: The optimal composite anchorage structures and non-optimal composite anchorage structures were constituted by soil nail and groups of fixed-length empty holes that regular setting in the end of soil nail. The only difference between that two kinds of structures is differ in length; the former is optimal and the latter is empirical. The comparative test results show that the dynamic strain of the non-optimal composite anchorage structure is 2.1 times higher than that of the optimal composite anchorage structure. The particle acceleration of the non-optimal composite anchorage structure is 2(in vault) - 5(in floor) times higher than that of the optimal composite anchorage structure. The macroscopic results show that the blast-resistance of the optimal composite anchorage structure is 2.1 times higher than that of the non-optimal anchorage structure. Under the limit damage condition, the distortion about vault of the optimal composite anchorage structure is 25 percent of the non-optimal anchorage structure; and the fallen area about structure surface of the optimal composite anchorage structure is 33 percent of the non-optimal anchorage structure

Key words: optimal composite anchorage structure, non-optimal composite anchorage structure, blast-resistance, comparative study

中图分类号:

U 455.7+2

赵林，曾宪明　，李世民　，林大路　，陆卫国　. 优化与非优化复合锚固结构抗爆性能对比试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 76-82.

ZHAO Lin , ZENG Xian-ming , LI Shi-min , LIN Da-lu , LU Wei-guo　　. Comparative test study of blast-resistance performance of optimal composite anchorage structures and non-optimal composite anchorage structures[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 76-82.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	谈云志，孔令伟，郭爱国，冯欣，万智. 红黏土路基填筑压实度控制指标探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 851 -855 .
[2]	荚颖，唐小微，栾茂田. 砂土液化变形的有限元-无网格耦合方法[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2643 -2647 .
[3]	胡明鉴，汪稔，陈中学，王志兵. 泥石流启动过程PFC数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 394 -397 .
[4]	张建新，刘双菊，周嘉宾. 逆作基坑开挖卸荷对工程结构的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 218 -223 .
[5]	彭从文，朱向荣，王金昌. 基于渐近展开法的脆性岩石双尺度方法初步研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 51 -62 .
[6]	李国玉，喻文兵，马巍，齐吉琳，金会军，盛煜. 甘肃省公路沿线典型地段含盐量对冻胀盐胀特性影响的试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2276 -2280 .
[7]	张军辉. 不同软基处理方式下高速公路加宽工程变形特性分析[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1216 -1222 .
[8]	李旭，张利民，敖国栋. 失水过程孔隙结构、孔隙比、含水率变化规律[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 100 -105 .
[9]	邓华锋，李建林，刘杰，朱敏，郭靖，鲁涛. 考虑裂隙水压力的岩体压剪裂纹扩展规律研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 297 -0302 .
[10]	姜世平，芮筱亭，洪俊，戎保，刘志军. 散粒体系统动力学仿真[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2529 -2532 .