盐岩地下储气库风险评价层次分析模型及应用

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 2299-2306.

盐岩地下储气库风险评价层次分析模型及应用

张强勇¹，王保群^{1, 2}，向文¹

1.山东大学岩土与结构工程研究中心，济南 250061；2.山东交通学院土木工程学院，济南 250023

收稿日期:2013-05-03 出版日期:2014-08-12 发布日期:2014-08-14
作者简介:张强勇，男，1967年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事岩土与结构工程方面的教学与科研工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目资助（No. 51279093，No. 41172268）；国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)资助（No. 2009CB724607）。

Hierarchical analytical model of risk evaluation for underground salt rock gas storage and its application

ZHANG Qiang-yong¹, WANG Bao-qun^{1, 2}, XIANG Wen¹

1. Research Center of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250023, China

Received:2013-05-03 Online:2014-08-12 Published:2014-08-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 国内盐矿具有埋藏浅、盐层薄、夹层多、品位低等特点，导致盐岩地下储气库建设和运营面临诸多技术风险。在盐岩地下储气库风险因子模糊综合评价基础上，建立了层状盐岩储气库破坏、油气泄漏、地表沉降的3大事故风险层次分析模型，并构建了风险因子对3大事故影响程度判断矩阵；将建立的模型用于评价江苏金坛盐岩地下储库气的运营风险状况，确定出储气库3大事故风险因子影响权重分布和风险等级。研究结果表明：（1）储气库破坏应重点控制低压运行压力、运行时间和矿柱应力状态；（2）储气库泄漏应重点控制套管靴位置、夹层结合面滑动、高压运行压力和管道阀门受损；（3）储气库地表沉降应重点控制顶板厚度、低压运行压力和运行时间；（4）储气库破坏和泄漏属中等风险水平，储气库地表沉降属高风险水平。油气储库3大事故风险因子权重分布和风险等级的确定，为盐岩地下储气库风险调控提供了理论指导。

关键词: 盐岩地下储气库, 风险因子, 风险评价层次分析模型, 储气库破坏, 储气库泄漏, 储气库地表沉降

Abstract: The salt mines in China have the properties of shallower burial depth, lower thickness, multiple interlayer and lower grade, which will cause more technical risks for construction and operation of underground salt rock gas storage. Based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of risk factors of gas storage, the paper has established a hierarchical analytical model of risk evaluation of three risk accidents that storage destruction, gas leakage and surface settlement for salt rock gas storage. The model has been used to evaluate operation risk condition of Jintan salt rock gas storage in Jiangsu Province. The effected weights distribution and risk grade of three risk accidents have been determined. The research results indicate: (1) Lower pressure and operation time of low pressure and stress state of pillar should be controlled to avoid gas storage destruction; (2) Position of casing shoe, sliding of interlayer surfaces, high pressure and damage of pipeline valves should be controlled to avoid gas leakage; (3) The roof thickness, lower pressure and operation time of low pressure should be controlled to avoid surface settlement of gas storage; (4) Storage destruction and gas leakage belong to middle risk, while surface settlement of gas storage belongs to high risk. The effected weights distribution of three risk accidents and risk grade provide theoretical guidance for risk regulation of underground salt rock gas storage in China.

Key words: underground salt rock gas storage, risk factors, hierarchical analytical model of risk evaluation, gas storage destruction, gas storage leakage, surface settlement of gas storage

中图分类号:

TU 457

张强勇，王保群，向文,. 盐岩地下储气库风险评价层次分析模型及应用[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2299-2306.

ZHANG Qiang-yong , WANG Bao-qun , XIANG Wen,. Hierarchical analytical model of risk evaluation for underground salt rock gas storage and its application[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2299-2306.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	魏丽，柴寿喜，蔡宏洲，王晓燕，李敏，石茜. 麦秸秆加筋材料抗拉性能的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 128 -132 .
[2]	孙德安，陈波. 重塑超固结上海软土力学特性及弹塑性模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1739 -1743 .
[3]	刘争宏，廖燕宏，张玉守. 罗安达砂物理力学性质初探[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 121 -126 .
[4]	王登科，刘建，尹光志，韦立德. 突出危险煤渗透性变化的影响因素探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3469 -3474 .
[5]	张成平，张顶立，骆建军，王梦恕，吴介普. 地铁车站下穿既有线隧道施工中的远程监测系统[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1861 -1866 .
[6]	王军，曹平，李江腾，刘业科. 降雨入渗对流变介质隧道边坡稳定性的分析[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2158 -2162 .
[7]	张渊，万志军，康建荣3，赵阳升. 温度、三轴应力条件下砂岩渗透率阶段特征分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 677 -683 .
[8]	唐世斌，唐春安，李连崇，张永彬. 湿度扩散诱发的隧洞时效变形数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 697 -0703 .
[9]	席人双，陈从新，肖国锋，黄平路. 结构面对程潮铁矿东区地表及岩体移动变形的影响研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 532 -538 .
[10]	何思明，张晓曦，王东坡 . 分层地基中抗拔桩破裂面的确定方法与极限抗拔承载力计算方法研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1433 -1437 .