›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 2145-2154.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1733

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

寒区隧道围岩最大冻结深度计算的半解析方法

夏才初1, 2,吕志涛1, 2,黄继辉3,李 强1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 土木工程学院 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092; 2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 福建省建筑科学研究院,福建 福州 350025
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-13 出版日期:2018-06-11 发布日期:2018-07-03
  • 作者简介:夏才初,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事隧道与地下建筑工程、岩石力学等方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.41472248);国家科技支撑计划项目(No.2014BAG05B00)

Semi-analytical method of maximum frozen depth calculation in cold region tunnel

XIA Cai-chu1, 2, LÜ Zhi-tao1, 2, HUANG Ji-hui3, LI Qiang1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Fujian Academy of Building Research, Fuzhou, Fujian 350025, China
  • Received:2016-09-13 Online:2018-06-11 Published:2018-07-03
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41472248) and the National Science and Technology Support Program Projects of China (2014BAG05B00).

摘要: 寒区隧道围岩的最大冻结深度是隧道抗冻胀结构设计、防排水与保温隔热层设计的重要基础参数。基于准稳态假定,采用积分法推导了能够考虑衬砌、保温层及冻结围岩中未冻水含量的寒区隧道围岩最大冻结深度的解析计算公式;利用围岩温度场数值模拟结果反演得出了解析计算公式中的参数影响半径与冻结半径比 的取值,从而得到了围岩最大冻结深度的半解析解。将所得解的计算结果与现场实测数据及数值模拟结果进行了对比,验证了所得解的合理性。利用得到的半解析解分析了工程冻土段围岩冻结深度的影响因素,结果表明:初始地温、年平均气温对冻结深度的影响最为明显,岩体骨架导热系数、岩体孔隙率的影响次之。

关键词: 寒区隧道, 冻结深度, 半解析方法, 影响因素

Abstract: The maximum frozen depth of surrounding rock is an important basic parameter in cold region tunnel design, such as frozen-preventing lining design, waterproof and drainage design, insulating layer design. To predict frozen depth of surrounding rock, various researches have been conducted, including field monitoring, numerical simulation, and derivation of practical estimation equations. In this study, a semi-analytical method is proposed to obtain the maximum frozen depth. First, the temperature acting on the lining surface is equivalent to a constant temperature according to the principle of equal annual accumulated temperature. Then, based on the quasi-steady state assumption, an analytical formula of the maximum frozen depth which considers the existing of lining, thermal insulation layer and the unfrozen water content in frozen rock is derived, using integration method. Next, the back analysis method is used to obtain the parameter which refers to the ratio of influence radius and frozen radius in the analytical formula, combined with the numerical simulation results of the temperature field. Finally, the semi-analytical solution of the maximum frozen depth is obtained. Through comparisons of the field monitoring data and the results of numerical simulation, the rationality of the proposed method is proved. Furthermore, the influence factors of the frozen depth are analyzed using the proposed semi-analytical solution, and the results show that the initial temperature and the annual average temperature have the most significant influence, and the rock conductivity coefficient and the porosity are less influential.

Key words: cold region tunnel, frozen depth, semi-analytical method, influence factors

中图分类号: 

  • U 45

[1] 杨军, 魏庆龙, 王亚军, 高玉兵, 侯世林, 乔博文, . 切顶卸压无煤柱自成巷顶板变形 机制及控制对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 989-998.
[2] 刘希灵, 刘周, 李夕兵, 韩梦思. 单轴压缩与劈裂荷载下灰岩声发射b值特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 267-274.
[3] 尹黎阳, 唐朝生, 谢约翰, 吕超, 蒋宁俊, 施斌, . 微生物矿化作用改善岩土材料性能的影响因素[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2525-2546.
[4] 胡明鉴, 张晨阳, 崔翔, 李焜耀, 唐健健, . 钙质砂中毛细水高度与影响因素试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4157-4164.
[5] 钟祖良, 别聪颖, 范一飞, 刘新荣, 罗亦琦, 涂义亮, . 土石混合体注浆扩散机制及影响因素试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4194-4202.
[6] 石泉彬,杨 平,于 可,汤国毅,. 冻土与结构接触面次峰值冻结强度试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2025-2034.
[7] 张玉伟,谢永利,李又云,赖金星,. 基于温度场时空分布特征的寒区隧道冻胀模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1625-1632.
[8] 王正振,龚维明,戴国亮,王晓阳,李亮亮,肖 刚,. 厚垫层-砂桩复合地基现场试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3755-3762.
[9] 李 芃,谭晓慧,辛志宇,王 雪,谢 妍,. 确定渗析平衡时间的数值模拟方法[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3363-3370.
[10] 包 含,伍法权,郗鹏程,. 基于统计本构关系的岩体弹性模量特征及影响因素分析[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2505-2512.
[11] 傅 华,赵大海 ,韩华强,凌 华,. 不同级配粗颗粒材料动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2279-2284.
[12] 荣垂强,赵晓华, 邹 宇,. 基桩低应变法三维干扰最小点位置的影响因素及确定方法[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1818-1824.
[13] 欧阳斌强,唐朝生,王德银,徐士康,施 斌. 土体水分蒸发研究进展[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 625-636.
[14] 宋鑫华,闫鸿浩. 基于尖点突变理论的浆砌块石边坡稳定性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3499-3505.
[15] 周 飞 ,许 强 ,刘汉香 ,王 龙,. 地震作用下含水平软弱夹层斜坡动力响应特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 133-139.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!