岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 104-116.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0849

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

三向地震作用下叠交隧道地震响应振动台试验研究

胡垚1,雷华阳1, 2, 3,雷峥1,刘英男1   

  1. 1. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300350;2. 天津大学 滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点实验室,天津 300350; 3. 天津大学 中国地震局地震工程综合模拟与城乡抗震韧性重点实验室,天津 300350
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-07 修回日期:2022-07-21 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-03
  • 通讯作者: 雷华阳,女,1974年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土与地下工程等方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: leihuayang74@163.com E-mail: hyjiaoliu@163.com
  • 作者简介:胡垚,男,1994年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土与地下工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    土木工程防灾国家重点实验室开发基金(No.SLDRCE17-01);国家重点研发计划项目(No.2017YFC0805402)。

Shaking table test on seismic response of stacked tunnels under three-directional earthquake wave excitation

HU Yao1, LEI Hua-yang1, 2, 3, LEI Zheng1, LIU Ying-nan1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering Simulation and Seismic Resilience of China Earthquake Administration, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
  • Received:2021-06-07 Revised:2022-07-21 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-03
  • Supported by:
    The work was supported by the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering (SLDRCE17-01) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0805402).

摘要: 叠交隧道是涉及隧道之间、隧道与土体相互作用的复杂体系,其安全性将严重影响城市轨道交通建设。目前,对于叠交隧道振动台试验的研究集中在水平平行和交叉叠交隧道、单向和双向地震动输入。鉴于此,利用自行设计的层状三向剪切模型箱,对竖直平行叠交隧道开展三向地震作用下的振动台模型试验,研究地基土−叠交隧道模型体系动力特性、地基土加速度、叠交隧道加速度、地表沉降、地基土孔压、叠交隧道动土压力及叠交隧道应变等地震响应。结果表明:随着震波峰值加速度(peak ground acceleration,简称PGA)依次增加,地基土−叠交隧道模型体系的自振频率随之减小,而阻尼比随之增大;叠交隧道周围地基土加速度和孔压的梯度差随着地震波PGA的增大而增大,且上隧道周围梯度差比下隧道更大;地基土对加速度的放大效应随着地震波PGA的增大而减弱;相同地震波作用下,相同位置处的叠交隧道加速度傅里叶谱形状相似,但幅值随着地震波PGA的增大而增大。此外,与顶部和底部位置相比,腰部位置加速度傅里叶谱频段范围变宽,幅值峰值有所降低;地表沉降峰值随着地震波PGA的增大而减小,相比地基土两侧位置,中心位置的沉降峰值明显较小;地震波的类型对叠交隧道动土压力峰值和应变峰值影响较小;对于动土压力峰值,两隧道的最大值均为腰部,而上、下隧道的最小值分别为底部、顶部;对于应变峰值,上隧道在腰部明显大于顶部和底部,而下隧道在4个位置相差不大。

关键词: 振动台试验, 叠交隧道, 地震响应, 三向地震

Abstract: Stacked tunnels is a complex system involving the interaction between tunnels and between tunnel and soil, and its safety will seriously affect the construction of urban rail transit. At present, the research on shaking table test of stacked tunnels focuses on horizontal parallel and cross arrangements, unidirectional and bidirectional ground motion input. This paper uses a self-designed three-dimensional laminar shear soil container to implement a shaking table model test on seismic response of vertical parallel stacked tunnels under three-directional earthquake wave excitation. Its seismic response includes the dynamic characteristics of foundation soil-stacked tunnels model system, the acceleration of foundation soil and stacked tunnels, ground settlement, the pore pressure of foundation soil, and the dynamic soil pressure and the strain of stacked tunnels. The results show that with the increase of seismic wave peak ground acceleration (PGA), the natural frequency of foundation soil-stacked tunnels model system decreases and the damping ratio increases. The gradient difference of soil acceleration and pore pressure around the stacked tunnels increases with the increase of seismic wave PGA, and the gradient difference around the upper tunnel is larger than that around the lower tunnel. The amplification effect of the foundation soil on the acceleration decreases with the increase of the seismic wave PGA. Under the action of same seismic wave, the shape of the acceleration Fourier spectrum of stacked tunnels at the same position is similar, but the amplitude increases with the increase of the seismic wave PGA. Furthermore, compared with the crown and bottom positions, the frequency range of the acceleration Fourier spectrum at the waist position becomes wider, and the peak amplitude decreases. The peak value of ground settlement decreases with the increase of seismic wave PGA, and the peak value of ground settlement in the center is obviously smaller than that on both sides of the foundation soil. The type of seismic wave has little effect on the peak value of dynamic earth pressure and strain of stacked tunnels. For the peak dynamic earth pressure, in the upper tunnel, the maximum value of the two tunnels is at the waist position, while the minimum value of upper and lower tunnels is at the bottom and crown positions, respectively. The peak strains at the both waist positions in the upper tunnel are significantly larger than those at the top and bottom positions, while the peak strain does not differ much at the four positions in lower tunnel.

Key words: shaking table test, stacked tunnels, seismic response, three-directional earthquake wave excitation

中图分类号: 

  • U451
[1] 刘斯宏, 李博文, 鲁洋, 沈超敏, 方斌昕, 杭丹, . 土工袋垫层抗液化性能振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 183-192.
[2] 郑森, 李伟华, 崔杰, 李亚东, . 刚度可调层状多向剪切模型箱的研制及性能测试[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 616-625.
[3] 安军海, 陶连金, 蒋录珍, . 盾构扩挖地铁车站结构地震反应特性振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1277-1288.
[4] 冯忠居, 孟莹莹, 张聪, 赖德金, 朱继新, 林路宇, . 强震作用下液化场地群桩动力响应及p-y曲线[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1289-1298.
[5] 郭明珠, 谷坤生, 张合, 孙海龙, 王晨, 刘晃, . 强震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1306-1316.
[6] 张聪, 冯忠居, 孟莹莹, 关云辉, 陈慧芸, 王振, . 单桩与群桩基础动力时程响应差异振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1326-1334.
[7] 周泽华, 吕艳, 苏生瑞, 刁钰恒, 王祚鹏, 王剑昆, 赵辉, . 花岗岩质边坡地震动力响应及破坏特征 大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 918-931.
[8] 陈世杰, 肖明, 王小威, 陈俊涛, . 陡倾角断层下地下洞室地震破坏特性数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2600-2610.
[9] 何江, 肖世国, . 多级拼装悬臂式挡墙地震永久位移计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1971-1982.
[10] 赖天文, 雷浩, 武志信, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维增强复合材料在高边坡防护中的 振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 390-400.
[11] 冯忠居, 张聪, 何静斌, 董芸秀, 袁枫斌, . 强震作用下嵌岩单桩时程响应振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3227-3237.
[12] 朱赛男, 李伟华, LEE Vincent W, 赵成刚, . 平面P1波斜入射下海底洞室地震响应解析分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 93-103.
[13] 徐超, 罗敏敏, 任非凡, 沈盼盼, 杨子凡. 加筋土柔性桥台复合结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[14] 李福秀, 吴志坚, 严武建, 赵多银, . 基于振动台试验的黄土塬边斜坡 动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2880-2890.
[15] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 基于自由场大型振动台试验的饱和砂土 固-液相变特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .