靖边气田煤层地应力及井壁稳定研究

›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (S2): 123-126.

靖边气田煤层地应力及井壁稳定研究

沈海超^{1, 2}，程远方²，赵益忠²，张建国²，夏元博²

1.中国石化国际石油勘探开发有限公司，北京 100083；2.中国石油大学石油工程学院，山东东营 257061

收稿日期:2009-07-25 出版日期:2009-08-10 发布日期:2011-06-21
作者简介:沈海超，男，1982年生，博士，主要从事油气井岩石力学与工程方面研究。

Research on in-situ stresses and borehole stability of coal seam in Jingbian gas field

SHEN Hai-chao ^{1, 2}, CHENG Yuan-fang², ZHAO Yi-zhong², ZHANG Jian-guo2, XIA Yuan-bo²

1.Sinopec International Petroleum Exploration and Production Corporation, Beijing 100083, China; 2.School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Dongying257061, China

Received:2009-07-25 Online:2009-08-10 Published:2011-06-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

煤层地应力测量难度很大，煤层垮塌失稳力学机理的研究还无法深入。针对这一现状，利用含煤层系中硬岩层的地应力实测结果，以组合弹簧模型为基础，反求出构造作用引起岩层水平方向的应变量，以此来确定后续地应力有限元模拟的边界条件，将硬岩层的地应力实测、理论模型计算以及有限元数值模拟三者有机结合起来，反演得到煤层地应力状态，从而建立起一套含煤岩系等软岩层地应力研究新方法。利用该方法对靖边气田某区块LP-1井煤层井壁稳定进行了研究，结果表明：沿最小水平地应力方向钻井井壁稳定性最好，沿最大水平地应力方向钻井井壁稳定性最差，而沿最大和最小水平地应力角角平分线方向钻井井壁稳定性介于前两者之间。

关键词: 靖边气田, 煤层, 地应力, 井壁稳定, 有限元法, 数值模拟

Abstract:

It is difficult to study instability mechanism of coal seam because the traditional methods are mostly questioned. In view of present situation, the strain magnitude in horizontal direction due to tectonic action has been calculated based on in-situ stress measurement in hard rocks combined with spring model. Taking the strain magnitude in horizontal direction as boundary condition for in-situ stress finite element analysis, a finite element model is set up to invert in-situ stress field of coal seam. Combining the in-situ stress measurement in hard rocks, theoretical model and finite element numerical simulation, a new method for research on in-situ stress in coal-bearing seam has been developed. The borehole stability of coal seam of well LP-1 in Jingbian gas field has been studied with the method, and the results show that the borehole stability is good when drilling along the direction of minimal horizontal in–situ stress, and it is bad when drilling along the direction of maximum horizontal in–situ stress; and the borehole stability when drilling along the bisecting lines ranged from the maximum to the minimal horizontal in–situ stresses falls in above two cases.

Key words: Jingbian gas field, coal seam, in-situ stress, borehole stability, finite element method, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TD 311

沈海超，程远方，赵益忠，张建国，夏元博. 靖边气田煤层地应力及井壁稳定研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 123-126.

SHEN Hai-chao, CHENG Yuan-fang, ZHAO Yi-zhong, ZHANG Jian-guo, XIA Yuan-bo. Research on in-situ stresses and borehole stability of coal seam in Jingbian gas field[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 123-126.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[2]	夏坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[3]	彭守建, 郭世超, 许江, 郭臣业, 张超林, 贾立, . 采动诱导应力集中对顺层钻孔瓦斯抽采影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 99-108.
[4]	刘波, 马永君, 盛海龙, 常雅儒, 于俊杰, 贾帅龙, . 白垩系红砂岩冻结融化后的力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 161-171.
[5]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[6]	闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[7]	刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[8]	金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[9]	韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[10]	吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[11]	王川婴, 王益腾, 韩增强, 汪进超, 邹先坚, 胡胜, . 基于钻孔形态分析的地应力测量方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 549-556.
[12]	陈卫忠, 田云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[13]	吴凤元, 樊赟赟, 陈剑平, 李军, . 基于不同侵蚀模型的高速崩滑碎屑流动力过程模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3236-3246.
[14]	孙峰, 薛世峰, 逄铭玉, 唐梅荣, 张翔, 李川, . 基于连续损伤的水平井射孔-近井筒三维破裂模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3255-3261.
[15]	曹洪, 胡瑶, 骆冠勇. 滤管两端均不在含水层层面的承压不完整井近似计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2774-2780.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed