基于Hewlett理论的支护桩桩间距计算方法研究

›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (S1): 351-0355.

基于Hewlett理论的支护桩桩间距计算方法研究

史海莹^{1, 2}，龚晓南^{1, 2}，俞建霖^{1, 2}，连峰³

1. 浙江大学岩土工程研究所，杭州 310058；2. 浙江大学软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室，杭州 310058； 3. 山东建筑科学研究院，济南 250014

收稿日期:2010-07-14 出版日期:2011-05-15 发布日期:2011-05-16
作者简介:史海莹，女，1981年生，博士研究生，主要从事基坑工程和复合地基方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家自然基金资助项目（No. 50708093）

A calculation method of pile spacing based on Hewlett soil arching theory

SHI Hai-ying^{1, 2}, GONG Xiao-nan^{1, 2}, YU Jian-lin^{1, 2}, LIAN Feng³

1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; 2. MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; 3. Shandong Provincial Academy of Building Research, Ji’nan 250014, China

Received:2010-07-14 Online:2011-05-15 Published:2011-05-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基坑支护桩桩间距设计通常基于经验取值，并不考虑土拱的作用和桩间土的稳定性。基于Hewlett理论分析了基坑支护桩桩间土拱效应，并开展了对桩间土整体稳定性的研究，分别得出了满足两种稳定条件的桩身荷载分担比公式和桩间距公式。通过对设置在四种土质中的支护桩桩间土拱的计算分析发现：对于强度指标较高的黏土、粉土，桩宽比为0.5时，荷载分担比即达到100%，而对于强度指标较低的淤泥质黏土，桩宽比为0.8时，荷载分担比方达到100%；桩间土整体稳定性对于桩间距的要求较为宽松。对于常规桩径的支护桩，桩间距的设计应按土拱稳定为控制准则，但对于设置在内摩擦角较大而黏聚力较小土层中的大直径桩，应按桩间土整体稳定为控制准则

关键词: 桩间距, 土拱, 整体稳定, 荷载分担比

Abstract: In engineering design, the soil arching and the entire stability of the soil mass between the soldier piles are usually neglected. The research was carried out on the soil arching and the entire stability of soil mass between the soldier piles in excavation. Expressions of the loading ratio and the spacing of the piles were obtained. Through the verification in four types of clays, it is found that in the silt and clay with higher strength index, the loading ratio reaches 100% when b/S is up to 0.5; where b is width of pile cross-section; S is pile spacing; and in the mucky clay with lower strength index, the b/S should be 0.8 for the 100% loading ratio. The pile spacing can be relatively wider under the condition of the entire stability of soil mass. For the pile with regular diameter, the pile spacing should be designed meeting the stability of the soil arching, while in silt with higher friction angle but lower cohesion, especially for the piles with large diameter, the pile spacing should be designed according to the entire stability of the soil mass between piles.

Key words: pile spacing, soil arching, entire stability, loading ratio

中图分类号:

TU 472.3+2

史海莹，龚晓南，俞建霖，连峰. 基于Hewlett理论的支护桩桩间距计算方法研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 351-0355.

SHI Hai-ying , GONG Xiao-nan , YU Jian-lin , LIAN Feng. A calculation method of pile spacing based on Hewlett soil arching theory[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 351-0355.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[2]	谢芸菲, 迟世春, 周雄雄, . 复杂环境中大规模桩筏基础的优化设计方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 486-493.
[3]	陈建旭, 宋文武, . 平动模式下挡土墙非极限主动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[4]	芮瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[5]	陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, . 考虑土拱效应的管棚合理间距计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1993-2000.
[6]	刘洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[7]	张玲, 陈金海, 赵明华. 考虑土拱效应的悬臂式抗滑桩最大桩间距确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4497-4505.
[8]	郭红仙, 周鼎. 软土中基坑土钉支护稳定性问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 398-404.
[9]	尹小涛，薛海斌，汤华，任兴文，宋罡,. 边坡局部和整体稳定性评价方法的辩证统一[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[10]	尹志强，佘成学，姚海林，卢正，骆行文，. 考虑土拱效应的黏性填土排桩桩后土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 131-139.
[11]	赖丰文，陈福全，万梁龙,. 考虑不完全土拱效应的浅层地基竖向应力计算[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2546-2554.
[12]	徐长节，梁禄钜，陈其志，刘元昆，. 考虑松动区内应力分布形式的松动土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1927-1934.
[13]	储召军，石少卿，孙建虎，李季，崔廉明,. 基于模型试验的桩间距对组合式钢管抗滑桩抗滑效果的影响分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 848-853.
[14]	杨贵，王阳阳，刘彦辰, . 基于曲线滑裂面的挡墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2182-2188.
[15]	李瑞林，周国庆，林超，赵光思，陈国舟,. 考虑土拱效应的滑移面间非极限状态土压力解答[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3145-3153.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed