›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (S1): 476-0482.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

降雨及库水位联合作用下秭归八字门滑坡稳定性预测

张桂荣1,程 伟2   

  1. 1. 南京水利科学研究院,南京 210024;2. 中南电力设计院,武汉 430074)
  • 收稿日期:2010-06-10 出版日期:2011-05-15 发布日期:2011-05-16
  • 作者简介:张桂荣,女,1979年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事滑坡稳定性预测预报方面的研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51009097)。

Stability prediction for Bazimen landslide of Zigui County under the associative action of reservoir water lever fluctuations and rainfall infiltration

ZHANG Gui-rong1, CHENG Wei2   

  1. 1. Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210024, China; 2. Central Southern China Electric Power Design Institute, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2010-06-10 Online:2011-05-15 Published:2011-05-16

摘要: 针对三峡库区库水位调控方案和极端降雨情况,对秭归县八字门滑坡稳定性分析设置了10种计算工况,采用SEEP/W软件模拟该滑坡在降雨入渗及库水位联合作用下的暂态渗流场,并利用SLOPE/W软件,将暂态孔隙水压力分布用于该滑坡的极限平衡分析中,确定不同工况下(不同降雨强度)的滑坡稳定性系数,据此采用降雨量对该滑坡进行失稳预测。研究认为:150 mm/d以上的降雨量对该滑坡影响较大,降雨入渗具有滞后性;在相同的降雨量情况下,1 d的降雨强度比5 d的连续降雨对滑坡体的稳定性影响更明显;在水位从175 m降至145 m的过程中,临界雨量为100 mm/d时,滑坡就可能失稳;水位从145 m升至175 m的过程中和175 mm稳定水位时,当临界雨量为200 mm/d时,滑坡才可能失稳,即水位骤降过程中滑坡失稳概率大。不同工况下的滑坡土体含水率分析结果表明,降雨影响的主要是上部土体,下部土体含水率受控于地下水位,即降雨更容易引起浅层滑坡与局部滑坡

关键词: 八字门滑坡, 临界降雨量, 水位波动, 稳定性预测

Abstract: Aimed at regulated scheme of Three Gorges Reservoir and extreme rainfall events, 10 working conditions were set for stability analysis of bazimen landslide of Zigui county. Transit seepage due to associative action of reservoir water lever fluctuations from 175 to 145 and rainfall infiltration was simulated adopted by SEEP/W software. And by using SLOPE/W software, the computed transit pore water pressures were used for limit equilibrium analysis of this landslide, then the landslide stability factors of different work conditions (different rainfall intensity) were decided and the rainfall could be used to predict landslide at last. The stability study showed it would have a great influence on landslide stability when the rainfall is greater than 150 mm/d, and rainfall infiltration had time delay. In the same condition of rainfall, the influence of one day’s rainfall intensity on landslide stability had greater than five day’s rainfall intensity. During the process of water lever descending from 175 m to 145 m, the landslide would be instability when the critical rainfall was 100 mm/d. That is to say, the landslide failure probability was high during the rapid drawdown. During the process of water lever ascending from 145 m to 175 m and the stable water lever of 175 mm, the landslide would be instability while the critical rainfall was reach to 200 mm/d, that means the landslide failure probability was low under the above two conditions. The results of moisture analysis on landslide showed that it mainly influenced upper soil by rainfall, and lower soil’s moisture was controlled by underground water, which indicated rainfall was accessible to cause shallow slope and local slope

Key words: Bazimen landslide;critical rainfall, water lever fluctuations, stability prediction

中图分类号: 

  • TD 853.34
[1] 陈 曦 ,张训维 ,陈佳林 ,金 锋 ,于玉贞,. 水位波动下非饱和心墙土坝体的渗流和稳定性[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 609-613.
[2] 卢书强 ,易庆林 ,易 武 ,黄海峰 ,张国栋 , . 三峡库区树坪滑坡变形失稳机制分析[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1123-1130.
[3] 肖诗荣 ,卢树盛 ,管宏飞 ,宋桂林,. 三峡库区凉水井滑坡地质力学模型研究[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3534-3542.
[4] 倪卫达 ,唐辉明 ,胡新丽 ,吴益平 ,苏爱军 . 黄土坡临江I号崩滑体变形及稳定性演化规律研究[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 2961-2970.
[5] 刘 杰,姚海林,胡梦玲,卢 正,余东明,陈风光. 水位波动下路基湿度动态响应及地下防排水模型试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 2917-2922.
[6] 胡新丽,张永忠,李长冬,范付松. 库水位波动条件下不同桩位抗滑桩抗滑稳定性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3679-3684.
[7] 白俊光 ,吕生弟 ,韩建设 . 李家峡水电站坝前水库滑坡蓄水前后稳定性预测[J]. , 2008, 29(7): 1723-1731.
[8] 高华喜,殷坤龙. 降雨与滑坡灾害相关性分析及预警预报阀值之探讨[J]. , 2007, 28(5): 1055-1060.
[9] 梁桂兰, 徐卫亚. 基于T-S模型的模糊神经网络在边坡稳定评价中的应用[J]. , 2006, 27(S2): 359-364.
[10] 胡新丽. 三峡水库水位波动条件下滑坡抗滑工程效果的数值研究[J]. , 2006, 27(12): 2234-2238.
[11] 张桂荣 ,殷坤龙 ,刘礼领 ,谢剑明 ,杜惠良,. 基于WEBGIS和实时降雨信息的区域地质灾害预警预报系统[J]. , 2005, 26(8): 1312-1317.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 马 青,赵均海,魏雪英. 基于统一强度理论的巷道围岩抗力系数研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3393 -3398 .
[2] 李加贵,陈正汉,黄雪峰,李 佳. 原状非饱和Q3黄土的土压力原位测试和强度特性研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 433 -440 .
[3] 荚颖,唐小微,栾茂田. 砂土液化变形的有限元-无网格耦合方法[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2643 -2647 .
[4] 胡明鉴,汪 稔,陈中学,王志兵. 泥石流启动过程PFC数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 394 -397 .
[5] 张建新,刘双菊,周嘉宾. 逆作基坑开挖卸荷对工程结构的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 218 -223 .
[6] 白 冰,李春峰. 地铁列车振动作用下近距离平行隧道的弹塑性动力响应[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 123 -128 .
[7] 李术才,徐帮树,丁万涛,张庆松. 海底隧道最小岩石覆盖厚度的权函数法[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 989 -996 .
[8] 李国玉,喻文兵,马 巍,齐吉琳,金会军,盛 煜. 甘肃省公路沿线典型地段含盐量对冻胀盐胀特性影响的试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2276 -2280 .
[9] 任 重,盛 谦. 我国岩石力学学科结构及其演变初探[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 293 -298 .
[10] 张军辉. 不同软基处理方式下高速公路加宽工程变形特性分析[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1216 -1222 .