基于模糊因素的岩质边坡地震稳定性多模型组合评价

›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (S1): 624-0629.

基于模糊因素的岩质边坡地震稳定性多模型组合评价

马毅¹，王希良²，刘振¹，郭阳阳²

1. 石家庄铁道大学交通运输学院，石家庄 050043；2. 石家庄铁道大学土木工程学院，石家庄 050043

收稿日期:2010-12-07 出版日期:2011-05-15 发布日期:2011-05-16
作者简介:马毅，男，1986年生，硕士生，主要从事安全评价工作
基金资助:
石家庄铁道大学研究生科研专项基金资助项目

Multiple model combination evaluation of seismic stability of rock slopes based on fuzzy factors

MA Yi¹, WANG Xi-liang², LIU Zhen¹, GUO Yang-yang²

1. College of Transportation, Shijiazhuang Railway University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China; 2. College of civil engineering, Shijiazhuang Railway University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China

Received:2010-12-07 Online:2011-05-15 Published:2011-05-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 岩质边坡地震稳定性评价是岩土边坡地震失稳防治的基础工作，针对评价过程中评价因素的多源模糊性，借鉴工程可变模糊集理论，将模糊可变评价模型应用于岩质边坡地震稳定性评价中。综合考虑岩质边坡内在结构和外部自然条件，选取岩土体特性、新构造运动特征、坡高、坡角、年均降雨量和场地地震烈度6个指标作为评价指标体系并建立等级标准；将改进熵权算法引入该模型中，利用指标实际数据离散性求权重；通过改变模糊可变评价模型参数对岩质边坡地震稳定性进行线性与非线性组合评价，并将均值作为最终评价结果。将该方法应用于天然边坡与路堑边坡实例中，结果表明，模糊可变评价模型评价结果合理、客观，具有更高的可靠性与稳定性，为岩质边坡地震稳定性评价工作提供了一种新的研究方法与思路

关键词: 岩质边坡, 地震, 边坡稳定性, 模糊集, 相对隶属度, 评价, 信息熵

Abstract: Evaluation of seismic stability of rock slopes is the important foundation for prevention of seismic unstability of rock and soil slopes. In view of the multi-source and fuzzy characteristics in evaluation process, by using engineering variable fuzzy set theory for reference, fuzzy variable evaluation model is applied to evaluate the seismic stability of rock slopes. First, by comprehensive consideration of the rock slopes internal structure and external natural conditions, six parameters including the characteristics of the geotechnical body, the characteristics of the neotectonics, slope height, slope angle, the annual average precipitation, site seismic intensity are selected as the indices for evaluation index system and established rating standard, then the weights of evaluation factors in the model are obtained from the index practical data discreteness by using improved entropy weight method; finally, by changing the fuzzy variable evaluation model parameters to evaluated seismic stability of rock slopes by linear and nonlinear, and obtained stability level by mean value. The method has been applied to natural slope and cutting slope instances. The results show that the fuzzy variable evaluation model results are reasonable and objective; and they have better reliability and stability so as to provide a new research method and idea for seismic stability of rock slopes.

Key words: rock slopes, earthquake, slope stability, fuzzy set, relative membership degree, evaluation, information entropy

中图分类号:

TU 413.62

马毅，王希良，刘振，郭阳阳. 基于模糊因素的岩质边坡地震稳定性多模型组合评价[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 624-0629.

MA Yi , WANG Xi-liang , LIU Zhen , GUO Yang-yang. Multiple model combination evaluation of seismic stability of rock slopes based on fuzzy factors[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 624-0629.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[2]	翁永红, 张练, 徐唐锦, 黄书岭, 丁秀丽, . 高水头下大型导流洞新型堵头-围岩相互作用规律与安全评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 242-252.
[3]	丁振杰, 郑俊, 吕庆, 邓建辉, 童孟胜, . 《工程岩体分级标准》中边坡工程岩体质量指标计算方法的讨论[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 275-280.
[4]	吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[5]	聂秀鹏, 逄焕平, 孙志彬, 谢松梅, 侯超群. 三维加筋边坡地震稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
[6]	陈舞, 张国华, 王浩, 陈礼彪, . 基于粗糙集条件信息熵的山岭隧道坍塌风险评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3549-3558.
[7]	刘新荣, 邓志云, 刘永权, 刘树林, 路雨明, . 地震作用下水平层状岩质边坡累积损伤与破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2507-2516.
[8]	韩俊艳, 钟紫蓝, 李立云, 赵密, 万宁潭, 杜修力. 纵向非一致激励下自由场土体的非线性地震反应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2581-2592.
[9]	何颖, 于琴, 刘中宪, . 考虑散射效应沉积河谷空间相关多点地震动模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2739-2747.
[10]	言志信, 龙哲, 屈文瑞, 张森, 江平, . 地震作用下含软弱层岩体边坡锚固界面剪切作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2882-2890.
[11]	徐鹏, 蒋关鲁, 雷涛, 刘琪, 王智猛, 刘勇, . 考虑填土强度的加筋土挡墙动位移计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1841-1846.
[12]	朱仁杰, 车爱兰, 严飞, 文海, 葛修润, . 含贯通性结构面岩质边坡动力演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1907-1915.
[13]	刘汉香, 许强, 朱星, 周小棚, 刘文德. 含软弱夹层斜坡地震动力响应过程的边际谱特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1387-1396.
[14]	余国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[15]	雷文杰, 李金雨, 云美厚, . 采动微地震波传播与衰减特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1491-1497.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed