›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (S1): 725-0731.

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

复杂条件下隧道断面形状和支护参数优化

韩现民,孙明磊,李文江,朱永全   

  1. 石家庄铁道大学 土木工程学院,石家庄 050043
  • 收稿日期:2010-12-03 出版日期:2011-05-15 发布日期:2011-05-16
  • 作者简介:韩现民,男,1970年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩石力学与隧道工程方面的研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家青年科学基金项目(No. 50908153);河北省教育厅资助项目(No. 927003)

Optimization of section shape and support parameters of tunnel under complicated conditions

HAN Xian-min, SUN Ming-lei, LI Wen-jiang, ZHU Yong-quan   

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Railway University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
  • Received:2010-12-03 Online:2011-05-15 Published:2011-05-16

摘要: 通过有限差分法(FLAC3D)数值计算和现场试验对马蹄形断面和大曲率边墙、似圆形断面形式下隧道的支护受力和围岩变形特征进行了对比分析,得出采用似圆形断面可以有效地控制围岩的变形量和变形速率,尤其是水平收敛变形;现场变形量测时的丢失位移所占总位移比例较大,其中下台阶丢失位移比例最大;通过现场试验,对不同支护刚度下围岩压力、锚杆受力、钢架、混凝土应力以及二次衬砌分担的围岩压力和模筑混凝土受力情况进行分析,结合洞室变形的现场量测,得出二次衬砌接触压力及分担围岩压力比呈现出随着初支刚度增大而增大的规律,并综合确定了板岩段合理的支护参数。该结论对在构造应力发育的软岩地区修筑隧道提供了有益的工程经验

关键词: 炭质板岩, 数值分析, 似圆形断面, 支护参数

Abstract: Numerical simulation (FLAC3D) and field experiments are used to study the shape effect of tunnel section. Stress of primary support and tunnel deformation under horseshoe-shaped section and large curvature wall, quasi circle-shaped section are analysed and compared. Numerical simulation and field measurement indicat that deformation and deformation rate of surrounding rock under quasi circle-shaped section could be effectively lessened, especially convergence of side wall, compared with that under horseshoe-shaped section. Ratio between lost displacement while measuring in-site and total displacement of surrounding rock is large, and the lost ratio of lower bench is largest. Field experiments of different support stiffnesses are conducted. It is measured and analysed that pressure of surrounding rock mass, axial force of anchor, stress of steel frame and stress of shotcrete under different primary support parameters. Also the contact pressure shared by secondary lining and the stress of mode concrete under different primary support stiffnesses are measured and analysed. Deformation of tunnel under different support stiffnesses are also measured. It is concluded that the contact pressure of secondary lining and pressure ratio shared by secondary lining increae with support stiffness increase. And suitable support form is synthetically determined. That would offer valuable practical experience to tunnelling in soft rock mass with high tectonic stress-field.

Key words: carbonaceous slate stratum, numerical simulation, quasi circle-shaped section, support parameter

中图分类号: 

  • U 45
[1] 朱才辉, 崔 晨, 兰开江, 东永强. 砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物拆除 对榆林卫城稳定性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3153-3166.
[2] 李 宁, 杨 敏, 李国锋. 再论岩土工程有限元方法的应用问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1140-1148.
[3] 郑黎明, 张洋洋, 李子丰, 马平华, 阳鑫军, . 低频波动下考虑孔隙度与压力不同程度变 化的岩土固结渗流分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1158-1168.
[4] 王建军, 陈福全, 李大勇. 低填方加筋路基沉降的Kerr模型解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 250-259.
[5] 闫澍旺,李 嘉,闫 玥,陈 浩,. 黏性土地基中竖向圆孔的极限稳定深度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1176-1181.
[6] 阿比尔的,郑颖人,冯夏庭,丛 宇,. 平行黏结模型宏细观力学参数相关性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1289-1301.
[7] 郭浩然,乔 兰,李 远. 能源桩与周围土体之间荷载传递模型的改进及其桩身承载特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4042-4052.
[8] 李一凡,董世明,潘 鑫,李念斌,原 野. 砂岩的I/III复合型断裂试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4063-4070.
[9] 郭 洋,李 清,徐文龙,钱 路,田 策. 条形药包爆破预制贯通裂纹动态断裂过程研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3882-3890.
[10] 刘天翔,王忠福, . 隧道正交穿越深厚滑坡体的相互影响分析与应对措施[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 265-274.
[11] 宋许根,陈从新,夏开宗,陈龙龙,付 华,邓洋洋,杜根明,. 竖井变形破坏机制与继续使用可行性探究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 331-342.
[12] 汪 昕,蔡 明, . 地震动在地下采场开挖边界的耦合数值分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3347-3354.
[13] 方 志,陈育民,何森凯,何 稼, . 减饱和松砂静态液化的水-气两相流耦合分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3378-3384.
[14] 李一凡,董世明,李念斌. 平台巴西圆盘复合型加载下T应力计算法[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 645-650.
[15] 邱明明 ,杨 啸 ,杨果林 ,房以河,. 云桂高速铁路新型全封闭路堑基床动响应特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(2): 537-544.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙树林,李 方,谌 军. 掺石灰黏土电阻率试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 51 -55 .
[2] 李英勇,张顶立,张宏博,宋修广. 边坡加固中预应力锚索失效机制与失效效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[3] 李 晶,缪林昌,钟建驰,冯兆祥. EPS颗粒混合轻质土反复荷载下变形和阻尼特性[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1769 -1775 .
[4] 梁健伟,房营光,谷任国. 极细颗粒黏土渗流的微电场效应分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3043 -3050 .
[5] 王丽艳,姜朋明,刘汉龙. 砂性地基中防波堤地震残余变形机制分析与液化度预测法[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3556 -3562 .
[6] 李秀珍,王成华,邓宏艳. DDA法和Fisher判别法在潜在滑坡判识中的应用比较[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 186 -192 .
[7] 陈力华 ,林 志 ,李星平. 公路隧道中系统锚杆的功效研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843 -1848 .
[8] 郑 刚 张立明 刁 钰. 开挖条件下坑底工程桩工作性状及沉降计算分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3089 -3096 .
[9] 赵明华,雷 勇,张 锐. 岩溶区桩基冲切破坏模式及安全厚度研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 524 -530 .
[10] 马 刚 ,常晓林 ,周 伟 ,周创兵 . 基于Cosserat理论的重力坝深层抗滑稳定分析[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1505 -1512 .