›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1333-1339.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同倾角组合煤岩体的强度与破坏机制研究

郭东明,左建平,张 毅,杨仁树   

  1. 中国矿业大学(北京) 力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2011-02-01 出版日期:2011-05-10 发布日期:2011-09-23
  • 作者简介:郭东明,男,1974年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩石力学及工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)计划资助项目(No. 2010CB732002);国家自然科学基金(No. 50874109);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(No. NCET-09-0726);高等学校全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目(No. 201030);中央高校基本科研业务费(No. 2009QL04)

Research on strength and failure mechanism of deep coal-rock combination bodies of different inclined angles

GUO Dong-ming, ZUO Jian-ping, ZHANG Yi, YANG Ren-shu   

  1. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2011-02-01 Online:2011-05-10 Published:2011-09-23

摘要: 对4种不同倾角组合煤岩体进行了试验和数值模拟研究,获得了单轴和三轴压缩条件下组合煤岩体的宏观破坏机制,并分析了煤岩组合体中煤、岩不同倾角交界面对煤岩组合体整体变形破坏的影响。研究表明,单轴荷载条件下煤岩组合体的破坏强度随着组合倾角的增加而出现先微小减小,而后迅速减小;同种倾角条件下,煤岩组合体的破坏强度随着围压的升高而逐渐升高,并且煤岩组合体的倾角越小,破坏强度升高的速率越慢,而倾角越大,升高的速率越快,可见围压对于大倾角裂隙的抑制作用更明显。通过三轴试验获得了煤岩组合体整体结构的黏聚力和内摩擦角,其中组合体黏聚力随着倾角的增加而逐渐减小,但内摩擦角变化规律不明显。通过扩展有限元对试验结果进行了模拟验证,发现随着倾角由0°增加到60°,外力功、屈服应力和弹性应变能都在下降,当倾角超过45°~50°后,外力功和屈服应力将与弹性应变能出现背离,这是煤岩组合体的变形破坏机制由剪切变形机制逐渐转化为界面滑移破坏机制重要标志。

关键词: 煤岩组合体, 不同倾角, 不同围压, 破坏强度, 破坏机制转变

Abstract: Experimental and numerical simulation researches on the strength property and failure mechanism of different inclined angles coal-rock combination bodies have been carried out. The macro-failure mechanism of coal-rock combination bodies has been obtained. And the effect of the interface between coal and rock has also been analyzed in detail. The uniaxial experimental results indicate that the failure strength of coal-rock combination bodies decreases slowly at first and then rapidly with the increasing of combination inclined angle. For the same inclined angle for coal-rock combination bodies, the whole failure strength increases with the increasing of the confining pressure. In addition, the smaller the combination inclined angle, the smaller the increasing rate of the failure strength; the bigger the combination inclined angle, the bigger the increasing rate of the failure strength. Therefore, the effect of the confining pressure on the large inclined angle of the coal-rock combination body is obvious. The cohesion and internal friction angle of coal-rock combination bodies have also been obtained through the triaxial experiments. The cohesion of combination bodies decreases with the increasing of the inclined angle. However, there are no clearly relationship between the internal friction angle and the inclined angle. The extended finite element method (XFEM) has been applied to simulate the failure of different inclined angles combination bodies. The simulation results from inclined angle 0° to 60°, of which the interval 5° indicate that external force work, yield stress and elastic strain energy decease with the increasing of the inclined angles. However, when the inclined angles are more than 45-50°, the external force work and the yield stress will change inversely with the elastic strain energy. This is an important symbol of failure mechanism changing from shear failure to slip failure mechanism for the coal-rock combined bodies

Key words: coal-rock combination body, different inclined angles, different confining pressures, failure strength, transform of failure mechanism

中图分类号: 

  • TU 43
[1] 刘远明 ,刘 杰 ,夏才初 , . 不同节理表面形貌下非贯通节理岩体强度特性直剪试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1269-1283.
[2] 左建平 ,谢和平 ,孟冰冰 ,刘建锋. 煤岩组合体分级加卸载特性的试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1287-1296.
[3] 蒲成志,曹 平,赵延林,张向阳,衣永亮,刘业科. 单轴压缩下多裂隙类岩石材料强度试验与数值分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3661-3666.
[4] 李永乐 ,刘汉东 ,刘海宁 ,刘慧卿 ,刘翠然,. 黄河大堤非饱和土土-水特性试验研究[J]. , 2005, 26(3): 347-350.
[5] 靖洪文 . 峰后岩石剪胀性能试验研究[J]. , 2003, 24(1): 93-96.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 谭贤君,陈卫忠,杨建平,杨春和. 盐岩储气库温度-渗流-应力-损伤耦合模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3633 -3641 .
[2] 魏 星,王 刚,余志灵. 交通荷载下软土地基长期沉降的有限元法[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 2011 -2015 .
[3] 温世亿,李静,苏霞,姚雄. 复杂应力条件下围岩破坏的细观特征研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2399 -2406 .
[4] 毛 宁,张尧亮. 经验公式简便求法典型实例[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2978 -2982 .
[5] 刘 杰,李建林,屈建军,陈 星,李剑武,骆世威. 基于卸荷岩体力学的大岗山坝肩边坡水平位移发育的多因素影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3619 -3626 .
[6] 李伟华,赵成刚,杜楠馨. 软弱饱和土夹层对地铁车站地震响应的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3958 -3963 .
[7] 韩现民. 西格二线关角隧道浅埋砂层段施工技术及力学效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 297 -302 .
[8] 刘用海,朱向荣,常林越. 基于Casagrande法数学分析确定先期固结压力[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 211 -214 .
[9] 李兴高,刘维宁. 挡土结构上水-土压力分算的进一步探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 419 -424 .
[10] 祝 磊,洪宝宁. 粉状煤系土的物理力学特性[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1317 -1322 .