›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 1749-1756.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

板桩加固护岸受力机制的现场试验研究

王新泉1,陈永辉2, 3,章宇强4,郑 宏4,许春虎2, 3   

  1. 1. 浙江大学城市学院 土木工程系,杭州 310015;2. 河海大学 岩土工程科学研究所,南京 210098; 3. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,南京 210098;4. 湖州市港航管理局,浙江 湖州 313000
  • 收稿日期:2010-12-17 出版日期:2011-06-10 发布日期:2011-06-21
  • 作者简介:王新泉,男,1981年生,博士,讲师,主要从事软土力学特性与地基基础工程方面的教学与研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    浙江省交通运输厅科技计划项目资助(No. 2010W08)

Field experimental study of stress mechanism of sheet pile reinforced revetment

WANG Xin-quan 1, CHEN Yong-hui 2, 3, ZHANG Yu-qiang4, ZHENG Hong4, XU Chun-hu2, 3   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, City College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310015, China; 2. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 4. Ports and Shipping Administration Bureau of Huzhou City, Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, China
  • Received:2010-12-17 Online:2011-06-10 Published:2011-06-21

摘要: 结合长湖申航道湖州段板桩加固护岸实体工程,在板桩预制过程中将土压力计埋入板桩侧面,底板施工时将土压力计埋入底板下,测试了在板桩混凝土凝固硬化过程中土压力计的受力情况、护岸荷载下板桩桩身两侧土压力的分布规律及护岸底板下土压力分布规律。试验结果表明,混凝土凝固硬化过程对埋入板桩两侧的土压力计会产生较大拉压应力并逐步趋于稳定,板桩两侧土压力及底板下土压力受施工荷载的影响在沉桩及底板施工初期存在较大调整并逐步趋于稳定;板桩靠岸侧和临水侧土压力分布存在明显差别,靠岸侧主动土压力分布呈现先增大后减小、然后增大的非线性分布规律,临水侧被动土压力基本呈线性分布。《板桩码头设计与施工规范》[1]中推荐的土压力计算方法计算靠岸侧主动土压力和临水侧被动土压力标准值均较实测值小,基本呈现随着深度的增加差别逐渐增大的规律;在护岸荷载作用下底板下土压力呈现两端大中间小的抛物线分布规律。

关键词: 板桩, 加固护岸, 现场试验, 受力机制, 桩侧土压力

Abstract: Based on the revetment reinforcement project at Huzhou section of Chang-Hu-Shen Waterway using sheet piles, soil pressure cells were buried on both sides of sheet pile during the precast period and at the bottom floor of revetment during constructing revetment. The pressure variation of earth pressure cell in the course of concrete setting and hardening, the rule of earth pressure distribution at both sides of sheet piles and the bottom floor of revetment were tested and analyzed. The results show that the course of setting and hardening of sheet pile will produce biggish tensile and compressive stresses and gradually become stable. Owing to construction load earth pressure on both sides of sheet pile and at the bottom floor of revetment produces a comparatively large adjustment in the period of initial construction and gradually become stable. The earth pressure distribution is obviously different at the bank side and near the water side; the active earth pressure distribution at the bank side is nonlinear that is firstly increased, then decreased and finally increased; the passive earth pressure distribution near the water side shows linear distribution. The differences are firstly little but gradually significant with the depth increasing between the calculated standard values using the method of Sheet Pile Wharf Design and Construction Specifications [1]and the measured. The calculated values are always less than the measured. Earth pressure distribution at the bottom floor of revetment shows large at two poles and little in the middle under revetment load, just like a parabolic distribution.

Key words: sheet pile, reinforced revetment, field test, stress mechanism, lateral earth pressure of sheet pile

中图分类号: 

  • TV 863
[1] 陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
[2] 冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[3] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 龚辉, 周昌, 徐楚, 王强, 应春业, . 3种模式下钻孔灌注桩桩-土剪切特性 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2838-2846.
[4] 余 瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[5] 王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王 滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[6] 信亚雯, 周志芳, 马 筠, 李鸣威, 陈 朦, 汪 姗, 胡尊乐, . 基于现场双管试验确定弱透水层水力参数的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1535-1542.
[7] 李 驰, 王 硕, 王燕星, 高 瑜, 斯日古楞, . 沙漠微生物矿化覆膜及其稳定性的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1291-1298.
[8] 任连伟, 孔纲强, 郝耀虎, 刘汉龙, . 基于能量桩现场试验的土体综合热导率系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4857-4864.
[9] 崔光耀, 祁家所, 王明胜, . 片理化玄武岩隧道围岩大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 231-237.
[10] 王炳龙,梅 祯,肖军华. 土工格室补强路基整治路基病害的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 325-332.
[11] 郭 飞,陶连金,孔 恒,马红红,张丽丽,张新全,. 兰州砂卵石地层盾构施工振动传播及衰减特性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3377-3384.
[12] 喻豪俊,彭社琴,赵其华,. 碎石土斜坡水平受荷桩承载特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2537-2545.
[13] 吴曙光,付红梅,张岩岩,. 拉压分散型锚索锚固机制及工程应用研究[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2155-2163.
[14] 王翔鹰,陈育民,江 强,刘汉龙, . 抗液化排水刚性桩沉桩过程的土压力响应[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2184-2192.
[15] 付海清,袁晓铭,王 淼,. 基于现场液化试验的饱和砂土孔压增量计算模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1611-1618.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘小文,常立君,胡小荣. 非饱和红土基质吸力与含水率及密度关系试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3302 -3306 .
[2] 黄建华,宋二祥. 大型锚碇基础围护工程冻结帷幕力学性态研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3372 -3378 .
[3] 王观石,李长洪,陈保君,李世海. 应力波在非线性结构面介质中的传播规律[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3747 -3752 .
[4] 王朝阳,许 强,倪万魁. 原状黄土CT试验中应力-应变关系的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 387 -391 .
[5] 万少石,年廷凯,蒋景彩,栾茂田. 边坡稳定强度折减有限元分析中的若干问题讨论[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2283 -2288 .
[6] 刘 嘉,王 栋. 正常固结黏土中平板锚基础的吸力和抗拉力[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 735 -740 .
[7] 赵尚毅,郑颖人,李安洪,邱文平,唐晓松,徐 俊. 多排埋入式抗滑桩在武隆县政府滑坡中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 160 -164 .
[8] 刘振平,贺怀建,朱发华. 基于钻孔数据的三维可视化快速建模技术的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 260 -266 .
[9] 魏厚振,颜荣涛,韦昌富,吴二林,陈 盼,田慧会. 含天然气水合物沉积物相平衡问题研究综述[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2287 -2294 .
[10] 赵跃堂,林家炜,石 磊. 冲击荷载作用下层裂问题研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 122 -126 .