›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 2146-2152.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

框架锚固类土质边坡预应力传递规律的研究

赵晓彦,熊自英   

  1. 西南交通大学 地球科学与环境工程学院,成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2009-11-11 出版日期:2011-07-10 发布日期:2011-06-30
  • 作者简介:赵晓彦,男,1977年生,博士,副教授,主要从事边坡稳定性及其预加固方面的研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 40772174);成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护实验室开放基金项目(No. GZ2006-02)

Study of transferring mode of prestressed force in frame-anchored soil-like slopes

ZHAO Xiao-yan,XIONG Zi-ying   

  1. Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
  • Received:2009-11-11 Online:2011-07-10 Published:2011-06-30

摘要: 将框架梁视为刚性梁,从而将锚索集中力转化为加在坡面上的矩形分布力,根据类土质边坡的工程特性,将边坡土体视为弹性体,推导了框架预应力锚索作用下坡体内任一点的预应力传递系数计算方法,得出了锚固预应力自坡面向坡体内的传递规律,并以G323改造工程某实际边坡为原型进行了离心模型试验,得出了预应力在坡体内不同位置处引起的土压力变化,间接得出预应力自坡面向坡体内的传递规律,离心模型试验得出的预应力传递规律与理论推导得出规律基本吻合。研究表明,在分布力作用下,类土质边坡岩土体的塑性形变相对于集中力作用时减小很多,坡体更多表现为弹性体,预应力分布系数受预应力大小的影响减小。相对于无框架单锚,框架预应力锚索措施中,锚索引起的高压应力得以很好的分散,压力分布系数由0.90左右降到了0.40左右,压应力集中程度减小约56%,从而在很大程度上减小了边坡浅层土体的压缩变形,减少了预应力损失,有效地提高了锚固效果,锚间距可由单锚的3.2 m增大为4.2 m左右

关键词: 框架锚固, 类土质边坡, 预应力, 传递规律

Abstract: On the assumption that the beams are rigid, and that the slope body is elastomeric, the anchoring concentrated force is translated into rectangular distributed force. And then, according the characters of soil-like slopes, the transferring equation of the prestressed force from slope surface into slope body in frame anchored soil-like slope is deduced. The transferring coefficients of the prestressed force are put forward according to the transferring formula. Some centrifugal model tests are carried out according to a granite soil-like slope locating at K617 of G232 national highway. In the centrifugal model tests, earth pressure cells are set at different points of the slope body to monitor the increased earth pressures caused by the prestressed force. And then the transferring discipline of the prestressed force from slope surface into slope body can be brought out. The results drawn out from centrifugal model tests agree with what from theoretical study mainly. The conclusions are drawn out from the calculations and model tests that the plastic deformation of the frame anchored slope body is distinctly small than single anchored slope body; and that the effect on distribution factor of prestressing force in frame anchored slope is smaller than what is in single anchored slope. The distribution factor of prestressing force is 0.4 in frame anchored slope, while it is 0.9 in single anchored slope, which indicates that about 56% of the prestressing force is well spread around. It is obvious that the compression strain in frame anchored slope is smaller than what is in single anchored slope, and that the decreasing of prestressing force can be smaller in frame anchored slope. The optimal space of anchors can enlarge to 4.2m for frame anchored slope from 3.2m in single anchored slope.

Key words: frame-anchor, soil-like slope, prestressed force, transferring discipline

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[2] 艾希, 冷伍明, 徐方, 张期树, 翟斌, . 新型预应力路基水平附加应力计算的图表法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 253-266.
[3] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[4] 秦伟, 戴国亮, 马李志, 裴铭海, 王磊, 朱光耀, 高博, . 珊瑚礁地层中PHC桩原位静载试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 381-389.
[5] 余 瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[6] 李 宁, 杨 敏, 李国锋. 再论岩土工程有限元方法的应用问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1140-1148.
[7] 王小伟, 朱杰兵, 李聪, . pH和O2协同作用下预应力锚杆 腐蚀损伤行为试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4306-4312.
[8] 冷伍明, 张期树, 徐方, 聂如松, 杨奇, 艾希, . 新型预应力路基坡面法向附加应力扩散规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3987-4000.
[9] 周 勇,令永强,杨校辉, . 考虑附加应力作用的桩锚支护结构稳定性与位移关系研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2913-2921.
[10] 严敏嘉,夏元友,刘婷婷. 地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2691-2698.
[11] 周 芬,梁 强,杜运兴. 单根无黏结预应力筋对加筋体力学性能的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2442-2450.
[12] 刘永权,刘新荣,谢应坤,余 瑜, . 基坑预应力锚索初始张拉锁定值取值规律探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2164-2174.
[13] 张建海,王仁坤,周 钟,郑 路,张 茹,谢和平, . 高地应力地下厂房预应力锚索预紧系数[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1002-1008.
[14] 李 韬,徐奴文,戴 峰,李天斌,樊义林,李 彪,. 白鹤滩水电站左岸坝肩开挖边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 665-674.
[15] 陈昌富, 曾松林, 刘一俊. 考虑预应力损失桩-锚结构内力计算的加权残值法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4569-4576.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[2] 梁桂兰,徐卫亚,谈小龙. 基于熵权的可拓理论在岩体质量评价中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 535 -540 .
[3] 马文涛. 基于灰色最小二乘支持向量机的边坡位移预测[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1670 -1674 .
[4] 于琳琳,徐学燕,邱明国,闫自利,李鹏飞. 冻融作用对饱和粉质黏土抗剪性能的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2448 -2452 .
[5] 王 伟,刘必灯,周正华,王玉石,赵纪生. 刚度和阻尼频率相关的等效线性化方法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3928 -3933 .
[6] 王海波,徐 明,宋二祥. 基于硬化土模型的小应变本构模型研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 39 -43 .
[7] 曹光栩,宋二祥,徐 明. 山区机场高填方地基工后沉降变形简化算法[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 1 -5 .
[8] 刘华丽 ,朱大勇 ,钱七虎 ,李宏伟. 边坡三维端部效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1905 -1909 .
[9] 刘年平 ,王宏图 ,袁志刚 ,刘竟成. 砂土液化预测的Fisher判别模型及应用[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 554 -557 .
[10] 王卫东 ,李永辉 ,吴江斌 . 超长灌注桩桩-土界面剪切模型及其有限元模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3818 -3824 .