›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 2435-2440.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

分层土中水泥土围护结构抗倾覆验算方法的改进

李卫超,熊巨华,杨 敏   

  1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2010-03-19 出版日期:2011-08-10 发布日期:2011-08-16
  • 作者简介:李卫超,男,1983年生,博士研究生,主要从事海洋桩基础与基坑支护方面的研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技支撑计划(No. 2008BAJ06B04-1)

Improved method for calculating anti-overturning safety factor of cement-soil retaining wall in layered soil

LI Wei-chao, XIONG Ju-hua, YANG Min   

  1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of MOE, Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2010-03-19 Online:2011-08-10 Published:2011-08-16

摘要: 推导了分层土中水泥土围护结构抗倾覆稳定系数计算公式,提出了改进的计算方法,研究了土层分层结构对水泥土围护结构抗倾覆稳定系数的影响。土层上软下硬时,水泥土围护结构抗倾覆稳定系数分别随着墙体宽度与入土深度的增加而增加。土层上硬下软时,增加墙体宽度对于提高抗倾覆稳定系数具有较好的效果,而增加墙体入土深度对于提高抗倾覆稳定系数作用不大,因为分层土中,水泥土围护结构抗倾覆稳定性主要依靠下部土体的被动土压力来维持,即抗倾覆稳定性主要受下层土体强度的影响。如将分层土参数按厚度加权平均取值后作为均匀土对待,对上软下硬土层,该方法计算的抗倾覆稳定系数比分层方法得到的小,偏于保守;而对上硬下软土层,该方法计算的抗倾覆稳定系数比分层方法得到的大,存在安全隐患。改进方法与常规计算方法对比表明,其计算结果更为安全合理

关键词: 分层土, 水泥土围护结构, 倾覆稳定验算, 改进算法

Abstract: An improved anti-overturning safety factor calculation method of the cement-soil retaining wall in layered soil is presented. Based on the improved method, the influence of different soil structures on the anti-overturning safety factor is analyzed. When the soft soil is over the hard soil the anti-overturning safety factor increases with increasing of the width and the embedded depth of the wall respectively. Similarly the anti-overturning safety factor also increases with increasing of the width of the wall but has less change with increasing of the embedded depth of the wall when the hard soil is over the soft soil. The reason for that is the anti-overturning safety of the cement-soil retaining wall relies mainly on the passive earth pressure; that is to say, the anti-overturning safety factor is influenced by the lower soil’s strength mainly. If treating the layered soil parameters according to the thickness weighted as the homogeneous soil, the anti-overturning safety factor is smaller which inclines to conservative when the soft soil is over the hard soil. Unlike that the anti-overturning safety factor is bigger which has the security risk when the hard soil is over the soft soil. Compared with the conventional calculation method, the improved method presents a more reasonable and safe result.

Key words: layered soil, cement-soil retaining wall, anti-overturning stability calculation, improved method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432
[1] 李晶, 陈育民, 方志, 高晗, 飞田哲男, 周葛, . 减饱和砂土缓倾场地的液化性状分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4352-4360.
[2] 方 志,陈育民,何森凯, . 基于单相流的减饱和砂土流固耦合改进算法[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1851-1857.
[3] 周 斌,严 俊,刘斯宏,杨茂盛,. 结点虚流量法理论基础阐释及改进算法[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 349-355.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[2] 梁桂兰,徐卫亚,谈小龙. 基于熵权的可拓理论在岩体质量评价中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 535 -540 .
[3] 马文涛. 基于灰色最小二乘支持向量机的边坡位移预测[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1670 -1674 .
[4] 于琳琳,徐学燕,邱明国,闫自利,李鹏飞. 冻融作用对饱和粉质黏土抗剪性能的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2448 -2452 .
[5] 王 伟,刘必灯,周正华,王玉石,赵纪生. 刚度和阻尼频率相关的等效线性化方法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3928 -3933 .
[6] 王海波,徐 明,宋二祥. 基于硬化土模型的小应变本构模型研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 39 -43 .
[7] 曹光栩,宋二祥,徐 明. 山区机场高填方地基工后沉降变形简化算法[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 1 -5 .
[8] 刘华丽 ,朱大勇 ,钱七虎 ,李宏伟. 边坡三维端部效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1905 -1909 .
[9] 刘年平 ,王宏图 ,袁志刚 ,刘竟成. 砂土液化预测的Fisher判别模型及应用[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 554 -557 .
[10] 王卫东 ,李永辉 ,吴江斌 . 超长灌注桩桩-土界面剪切模型及其有限元模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3818 -3824 .