›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (S2): 383-388.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

频率下降率法对2011年新西兰 6.3级地震液化的盲测

孙 锐,唐福辉,袁晓铭   

  1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所,哈尔滨 150080
  • 收稿日期:2011-04-01 出版日期:2011-08-10 发布日期:2011-08-26
  • 作者简介:孙锐,女,1972年生,博士,研究员,主要从事土动力学方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 90715017,No.50778165);国家科技部国际合作项目(No.2009DFA71720);国家重点基础研究发展计划 (No. 2007CB714201);哈尔滨市人才专项资金项目(No. 2007RFXYS065)

Blind detection of liquefaction sites by the method of frequency decrease rate for New Zealand Earthquake

SUN Rui, TANG Fu-hui, YUAN Xiao-ming   

  1. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China
  • Received:2011-04-01 Online:2011-08-10 Published:2011-08-26

摘要: 场地液化实时监测是减轻地震灾害的新手段,其核心是建立依据强震记录识别场地液化技术,但目前建立的方法尚不成熟,可靠性也缺少实际地震的检验。2011年新西兰地震中液化及其震害现象显著,为检测现有液化识别方法提供了条件。利用该次强震记录,采用孙锐和袁晓铭以往提出的频率下降率法对记录场地液化进行了盲测,为今后方法改进提供思路。针对震中距小于50 km的全部27条原始强震记录进行了识别,有9个场地识别为液化场地,其余为非液化场地;对两个已报道为液化的场地,频率下降率法给出了正确的识别结果;识别出的液化场地主要集中在克赖斯特彻奇市东侧Avon河两岸,这一结果与报导定性相符;发现有两个场地原始强震记录存在疑点,经处理后给出了修正结果。

关键词: 新西兰地震, 液化, 频率下降率法, 盲测

Abstract: The real-time liquefaction monitoring and warning techniques are novel ways to mitigate liquefaction hazard. The key point for the techniques is to establish a reverse liquefaction detection method based on seismic records. However, the reliability of the existing liquefaction detection methods is lack of verification by earthquake records. There were serious liquefaction damages in Christchurch in New Zealand Earthquake in 2011 and creates a wonderful chance to exam the existing liquefaction detection methods. The acceleration records in the earthquake are employed to perform the blind detection of liquefaction situation by frequency decrease rate(FDR) method presented by the authors before. The results indicate that in all 27 sites of which the distances from epicenter are less than 50 km; there are 9 liquefaction sites and others are identified as non-liquefaction sites. Two liquefaction sites among the 9 liquefaction sites; have been confirmed by the news reports; and it means the detection results by FDR method are correct. The identified liquefaction sites by method are mainly located near the Avon River in the eastern of Christchurch, which are agreeable to the corresponding news reports. From the analysis of the paper, two earthquake records are in doubt because of the un-normal phenomena with significant high frequency components in the middle or beginning part of the waves, separately; and the revised results for the two seismic waves are given after filtering the records.

Key words: New Zealand Earthquake, liquefaction, method of frequency decrease rate, blind detection

中图分类号: 

  • TU 413
[1] 马维嘉, 陈国兴, 吴琪, . 复杂加载条件下珊瑚砂抗液化强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 535-542.
[2] 熊辉, 杨丰, . 文克尔地基模型下液化土桩基水平振动响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 103-110.
[3] 李兆焱, 袁晓铭, 孙锐. 液化判别临界曲线的变化模式与一般规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3603-3609.
[4] 杨洋, 孙锐, 陈卓识, 袁晓铭. 基于土层常规参数的剪切波速液化概率计算公式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2755-2764.
[5] 汪俊敏, 熊勇林, 杨骐莱, 桑琴扬, 黄强. 不饱和土动弹塑性本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2323-2331.
[6] 邹佑学, 王睿, 张建民, . 可液化场地碎石桩复合地基地震动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2443-2455.
[7] 庄海洋, 付继赛, 陈 苏, 陈国兴, 王雪剑, . 微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1263-1272.
[8] 魏 星, 张 昭, 王 刚, 张建民, . 饱和砂土液化后大变形机制的离散元细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1596-1602.
[9] 裴向军, 朱 凌, 崔圣华, 张晓超, 梁玉飞, 高会会, 张子东. 大光包滑坡层间错动带液化特性及 滑坡启动成因探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1085-1096.
[10] 李晶, 陈育民, 方志, 高晗, 飞田哲男, 周葛, . 减饱和砂土缓倾场地的液化性状分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4352-4360.
[11] 王丽艳, 巩文雪, 曹晓婷, 姜朋明, 王炳辉. 砾钢渣抗液化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3741-3750.
[12] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 液化自由场地震响应大型振动台模型试验分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3767-3777.
[13] 高冉, 叶剑红, . 中国南海吹填岛礁钙质砂动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3897-3896.
[14] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 高畄成, 陈 苏, 杜修力, . 地震动持时压缩比对可液化地基地震反应 影响的振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 147-155.
[15] 王海波,吴 琪,杨 平,. 细粒含量对饱和砂类土液化强度的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2771-2779.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[3] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[4] 万 智,董 辉,刘宝琛. 基于正交设计下SVM滑坡变形时序回归预测的超参数选择[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[5] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[6] 胡勇刚,罗 强,张 良,黄 晶,陈亚美. 基于离心模型试验的水泥土搅拌法加固斜坡软弱土地基变形特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2207 -2213 .
[7] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[8] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[9] 杨召亮,孙冠华,郑 宏. 基于潘氏极大值原理的边坡稳定性的整体分析法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 559 -563 .
[10] 王光进,杨春和,张 超,马洪岭,孔祥云,侯克鹏. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .